Nancy_Winks
Well-Known Member
Exactly. It achieves fuck all except misery.
That large elements of the press are cunts is hardly news. But the roles of the press is in part to bring matters of public concern to the attention of the public. As he and his party are elected on issues of morality around marriage it is of concern to the people who vote for them or are likely too that their personal conduct conflicts with their policy stance.I hate that as much as you. I just hate the way that the press destroys people via their personal life too.
I agree that sex scandals are not exclusively British. What does seem to be so is the way that the press thinks that these indiscretions are a stick to beat people with, even when there is little or no relevance to the person's function. The people who are most likely to suffer in a situation like this are those who are least deserving of this approbation.sex scandals are not in any way peculiarly british. What an odd thing to say.
He is in a Government that tells people how they should live there lives and how we should behave and do the right thing. Fuck him he is fair game.What business of that is yours or anyone else's? Leave him, his wife and the other women involved alone.
Loads, but I'm not an MP, stupid bugger should have had more sense.God have none of you ever made a mistake?
it's always good when a politician has their career destroyed. no it won't change anything, except maybe make all the others paranoid that their every indiscretion is going to be exposed. it's pure scahdenfreude for me and it's great.So he gets replaced by some other Tory cunt with the same politics, it's not like there's a shortage of them. Nothing about this will change their behaviour, and for that matter their actions don't actually affect whether they are cunts or not for promoting cuntish policies - they could be complete exemplars of the ethics they claim and they'd still be cunts because those policies are intrinsincally bad.
And he's not been fired for being a hypocrite has he? He's been fired for being in an "embarrassing situation", an extra-marital affair. All this promotes is the idea that those are the only things that matters. Nothing political counts and causes an MP's immediate resignation, it's only sending dick pics.
It's been going on for hundreds of years and have politicians improved? Do we still have the same prurient bullshit that they can do what they like politically - destroy lives - but have an affair and ooh that's what really counts?it's always good when a politician has their career destroyed. no it won't change anything, except maybe make all the others paranoid that their every indiscretion is going to be exposed. it's pure scahdenfreude for me and it's great.
I'm sending a cock pic to someone I don't know, I'm a Tory Minister, what could possibly go wrong?Yes he should have thought about his actions, but how many times do we all do things without actually thinking through the results of our actions, especially when emotions are involved?
my post was only 3 sentences long and one of them did clearly state that it won't change anything - and none of them said it's what really countsIt's been going on for hundreds of years and have politicians improved? Do we still have the same prurient bullshit that they can do what they like politically - destroy lives - but have an affair and ooh that's what really counts?
I'm sending a cock pic to someone I don't know, I'm a Tory Minister, what could possibly go wrong?
It's comic and pathetic. But does it improve the quality of our political dialogue? Or is this tragic knockabout nonsense as good as it gets?it's always good when a politician has their career destroyed. no it won't change anything, except maybe make all the others paranoid that their every indiscretion is going to be exposed. it's pure scahdenfreude for me and it's great.
"except maybe make all the others paranoid that their every indiscretion is going to be exposed" - they've been like that forever. Sometimes they forget or ignore it or whatever their reasons.my post was only 3 sentences long and one of them did clearly state that it won't change anything - and none of them said it's what really counts
...It's willy-waving by the tabloids anyway and they can fuck off as much as the Tories.
but they never get fired for the stuff that matters. no matter how shit they are they always end up doing ok (directorships, media, europe, ngo whatever) which is why i enjoy it when they fuck themselves."except maybe make all the others paranoid that their every indiscretion is going to be exposed" - they've been like that forever. Sometimes they forget or ignore it or whatever their reasons.
Getting someone fired for irrelevant bullshit, when they don't get fired for actual relevant activities, promotes the idea that it's only the bullshit that matters. You know, if he'd been a massive proponent of monogamy politically, or there was some great tactical reason to get that particular person out... but no, the basis behind this whole thing is more damaging than the result.
It's willy-waving by the tabloids anyway and they can fuck off as much as the Tories.
That's the problem though isn't it? If we applaud when somebody gets fired because of stupid shit - and, for that matter, stupid shit that reinforces the conservative social message their party promotes - that just makes it worse, it gives the impression the press is doing a proper job. It needs challenging every time.but they never get fired for the stuff that matters. no matter how shit they are they always end up doing ok (directorships, media, europe, ngo whatever) which is why i enjoy it when they fuck themselves.
Yes, yes I see it now. Britain became more socially conservative after all those tories in the Major years got caught with their pants down or with envelopes of dodgy cash.That's the problem though isn't it? If we applaud when somebody gets fired because of stupid shit - and, for that matter, stupid shit that reinforces the conservative social message their party promotes -
And we still have the same public moralising and the same "sex scandals" as in the 90s. With smug politico jokes.Yes, yes I see it now. Britain became more socially conservative after all those tories in the Major years got caught with their pants down or with envelopes of dodgy cash.
Err no. It helped turn their public moralising into a joke that is remembered 20 years later.
You are talking horse shit.And we still have the same public moralising
And we still have the same public moralising and the same "sex scandals" as in the 90s. With smug politico jokes.
We have relentless, aggressive public moralising. If it's different in tone to how it was 20 years ago that's the result of social change not tabloid sex scandals.You are talking horse shit.
Back then we had cunts like Lilly giving it the "I have a little list" turn at the tory conference that attacked single mothers for being single mothers. We had section 28 and the whole Major "back to basics" bollox.
We have public moralising but its nothing like the tone it was 20 odd years ago.
so i'm not allowed to enjoy a tory politician ruining his career? that seems really unfairThat's the problem though isn't it? If we applaud when somebody gets fired because of stupid shit - and, for that matter, stupid shit that reinforces the conservative social message their party promotes - that just makes it worse, it gives the impression the press is doing a proper job. It needs challenging every time.
They want to take all our funso i'm not allowed to enjoy a tory politician ruining his career? that seems really unfair
Exactly. It achieves fuck all except misery.