Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Tory minister for civil society Brooks Newmark resigns after sex scandal

I hate that as much as you. I just hate the way that the press destroys people via their personal life too.
That large elements of the press are cunts is hardly news. But the roles of the press is in part to bring matters of public concern to the attention of the public. As he and his party are elected on issues of morality around marriage it is of concern to the people who vote for them or are likely too that their personal conduct conflicts with their policy stance.

I am just enjoying the schadenfreude of a man who wanted less scrutiny of the consequence by charities of his parties policies being caught out violating the morality those policies claim to defend.
 
sex scandals are not in any way peculiarly british. What an odd thing to say.
I agree that sex scandals are not exclusively British. What does seem to be so is the way that the press thinks that these indiscretions are a stick to beat people with, even when there is little or no relevance to the person's function. The people who are most likely to suffer in a situation like this are those who are least deserving of this approbation.
 
So he gets replaced by some other Tory cunt with the same politics, it's not like there's a shortage of them. Nothing about this will change their behaviour, and for that matter their actions don't actually affect whether they are cunts or not for promoting cuntish policies - they could be complete exemplars of the ethics they claim and they'd still be cunts because those policies are intrinsincally bad.

And he's not been fired for being a hypocrite has he? He's been fired for being in an "embarrassing situation", an extra-marital affair. All this promotes is the idea that those are the only things that matters. Nothing political counts and causes an MP's immediate resignation, it's only sending dick pics.
it's always good when a politician has their career destroyed. no it won't change anything, except maybe make all the others paranoid that their every indiscretion is going to be exposed. it's pure scahdenfreude for me and it's great.
 
it's always good when a politician has their career destroyed. no it won't change anything, except maybe make all the others paranoid that their every indiscretion is going to be exposed. it's pure scahdenfreude for me and it's great.
It's been going on for hundreds of years and have politicians improved? Do we still have the same prurient bullshit that they can do what they like politically - destroy lives - but have an affair and ooh that's what really counts?
 
It's been going on for hundreds of years and have politicians improved? Do we still have the same prurient bullshit that they can do what they like politically - destroy lives - but have an affair and ooh that's what really counts?
my post was only 3 sentences long and one of them did clearly state that it won't change anything - and none of them said it's what really counts
 
it's always good when a politician has their career destroyed. no it won't change anything, except maybe make all the others paranoid that their every indiscretion is going to be exposed. it's pure scahdenfreude for me and it's great.
It's comic and pathetic. But does it improve the quality of our political dialogue? Or is this tragic knockabout nonsense as good as it gets?
 
my post was only 3 sentences long and one of them did clearly state that it won't change anything - and none of them said it's what really counts
"except maybe make all the others paranoid that their every indiscretion is going to be exposed" - they've been like that forever. Sometimes they forget or ignore it or whatever their reasons.

Getting someone fired for irrelevant bullshit, when they don't get fired for actual relevant activities, promotes the idea that it's only the bullshit that matters. You know, if he'd been a massive proponent of monogamy politically, or there was some great tactical reason to get that particular person out... but no, the basis behind this whole thing is more damaging than the result.

It's willy-waving by the tabloids anyway and they can fuck off as much as the Tories.
 
"except maybe make all the others paranoid that their every indiscretion is going to be exposed" - they've been like that forever. Sometimes they forget or ignore it or whatever their reasons.

Getting someone fired for irrelevant bullshit, when they don't get fired for actual relevant activities, promotes the idea that it's only the bullshit that matters. You know, if he'd been a massive proponent of monogamy politically, or there was some great tactical reason to get that particular person out... but no, the basis behind this whole thing is more damaging than the result.

It's willy-waving by the tabloids anyway and they can fuck off as much as the Tories.
but they never get fired for the stuff that matters. no matter how shit they are they always end up doing ok (directorships, media, europe, ngo whatever) which is why i enjoy it when they fuck themselves.
 
he didn't get fired, he resigned. or at least, that's the public version. Remember Alan Clark, a revolting specimen of human being, but when it transpired he'd had an affair with a woman, and with her two daughters, he just laughed and carried on as before. That option may or may not have been available here, but he'd have been daring Cameron to publicly fire him, on a day when another tory mp has defected to UKIP. He didn't have the nerve.
 
Damn! I saw the headlines and thought it was going to be a rentboy. What a bummer!

Excuse the pun.
 
but they never get fired for the stuff that matters. no matter how shit they are they always end up doing ok (directorships, media, europe, ngo whatever) which is why i enjoy it when they fuck themselves.
That's the problem though isn't it? If we applaud when somebody gets fired because of stupid shit - and, for that matter, stupid shit that reinforces the conservative social message their party promotes - that just makes it worse, it gives the impression the press is doing a proper job. It needs challenging every time.
 
Tbf Hollande didn't send cock pix, he rode round there on a scooter for a shag wearing a stupid helmet. Perhaps they do it different in France.
 
That's the problem though isn't it? If we applaud when somebody gets fired because of stupid shit - and, for that matter, stupid shit that reinforces the conservative social message their party promotes -
Yes, yes I see it now. Britain became more socially conservative after all those tories in the Major years got caught with their pants down or with envelopes of dodgy cash.

Err no. It helped turn their public moralising into a joke that is remembered 20 years later.
 
Yes, yes I see it now. Britain became more socially conservative after all those tories in the Major years got caught with their pants down or with envelopes of dodgy cash.

Err no. It helped turn their public moralising into a joke that is remembered 20 years later.
And we still have the same public moralising and the same "sex scandals" as in the 90s. With smug politico jokes.
 
And we still have the same public moralising
You are talking horse shit.
Back then we had cunts like Lilly giving it the "I have a little list" turn at the tory conference that attacked single mothers for being single mothers. We had section 28 and the whole Major "back to basics" bollox.

We have public moralising but its nothing like the tone it was 20 odd years ago.
 
You are talking horse shit.
Back then we had cunts like Lilly giving it the "I have a little list" turn at the tory conference that attacked single mothers for being single mothers. We had section 28 and the whole Major "back to basics" bollox.

We have public moralising but its nothing like the tone it was 20 odd years ago.
We have relentless, aggressive public moralising. If it's different in tone to how it was 20 years ago that's the result of social change not tabloid sex scandals.
 
That's the problem though isn't it? If we applaud when somebody gets fired because of stupid shit - and, for that matter, stupid shit that reinforces the conservative social message their party promotes - that just makes it worse, it gives the impression the press is doing a proper job. It needs challenging every time.
so i'm not allowed to enjoy a tory politician ruining his career? that seems really unfair
 
Back
Top Bottom