Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Tory Death Spiral

You know this is exactly the same line that people were spinning 20 years ago. Hell, there are posts on here from 4/8 years ago about how the Republican party was 'going to be made obsolete' by demographics. It's crap.
It completely disregards the possibility that people's outlook, priorities etc change as they age
 
Agree they're not going to die out but it's already clear that their membership is diminishing. That might change but it's hard to see them turning that around very soon. They're already becoming less representative of the traditional Tory club Bufton-Tufton types and more of big business and I'd think they'd go further that way.
 
You know this is exactly the same line that people were spinning 20 years ago. Hell, there are posts on here from 4/8 years ago about how the Republican party was 'going to be made obsolete' by demographics. It's crap.
I think you're probably right, but nonetheless the tories themselves are clearly worried by their fast-ageing membership and their near-total failure in youth recruitment (and by 'youth', that basically means anyone under 40 as far as they're concerned. Their member rolls fie completely when they hit that age group). Ditto, the withering of their base, full stop
The Tories are putting a huge effort into addressing this; hence 'Activate' and 'YourConviction'. Unfortunately, both were pretty clueless, and have more or less failed completely,already
 
I think you're probably right, but nonetheless the tories themselves are clearly worried by their fast-ageing membership and their near-total failure in youth recruitment (and by 'youth', that basically means anyone under 40 as far as they're concerned. Their member rolls fie completely when they hit that age group). Ditto, the withering of their base, full stop
The Tories are putting a huge effort into addressing this; hence 'Activate' and 'YourConviction'. Unfortunately, both were pretty clueless, and have more or less failed completely,already
They certainly have, I'm in the target range and this is literally the first I've ever heard of these just googled them and found a guardian story rubbishing the idea.
 
I think you're probably right, but nonetheless the tories themselves are clearly worried by their fast-ageing membership and their near-total failure in youth recruitment (and by 'youth', that basically means anyone under 40 as far as they're concerned. Their member rolls fie completely when they hit that age group). Ditto, the withering of their base, full stop
The Tories are putting a huge effort into addressing this; hence 'Activate' and 'YourConviction'. Unfortunately, both were pretty clueless, and have more or less failed completely,already
Sure, the last GE showed what an large and active membership can do and this is an area that the Tories are weak on. But they aren't going to become a minor party and they can still pull in large number of voters even with a small base.

It is an area for concern for them but I really dislike these 'oh the demographics will kill off X' arguments. Beside being shown to be false time and time again they (as JTG pointed out above) ignore the fact that people's outlook/positions change, and change in response to material conditions.
 
The Tories are putting a huge effort into addressing this; hence 'Activate' and 'YourConviction'. Unfortunately, both were pretty clueless, and have more or less failed completely,already
Almost no efforts were put into Activate and YourConviction, fairly obviously.
 
Sure, the last GE showed what an large and active membership can do and this is an area that the Tories are weak on. But they aren't going to become a minor party and they can still pull in large number of voters even with a small base.

It is an area for concern for them but I really dislike these 'oh the demographics will kill off X' arguments. Beside being shown to be false time and time again they (as JTG pointed out above) ignore the fact that people's outlook/positions change, and change in response to material conditions.

It is the trap of confusing correlation with causation.

The Conservative Party still captured more votes than Labour whilst at the same time executing possibly the worst election campaign in recent history. I'm not sure the theory of 'one more big push' is that valid. The next election isn't due until 2022, I doubt the Tories are going to pull the trigger on an early one until they believe they are in a strong electoral position.
 
Almost no efforts were put into Activate and YourConviction, fairly obviously.

I don't really understand how Momentum came about, was is a group set up by parts of Corbyn's leadership campaign or was it a spontaneous happening?
 
I don't really understand how Momentum came about, was is a group set up by parts of Corbyn's leadership campaign or was it a spontaneous happening?
It was set up in response to the number of younger people joining to vote for Corbyn, in the expectation that they may be put off by the normal business of local party politics - so set up by members of Corbyn's leadership campaign to respond to a spontaneous happening.
 
It was set up in response to the number of younger people joining to vote for Corbyn, in the expectation that they may be put off by the normal business of local party politics - so set up by members of Corbyn's leadership campaign to respond to a spontaneous happening.

Thanks, do you think it was the fact it was built around Corbyn rather than the Party is what made it so successful and ultimately very difficult to replicate?
 
Although it's worth remembering that until the recent general election, Momentum was widely considered an ineffective, gaffe-prone laughing stock.
 
It's difficult for the Tories to replicate because they don't have a few hundred thousand energetic new members.

I think Party membership is overblown to some extent. I know from Labour members where I live they were amazed how many warm bodies they had to bang on doors. so having 600,000 paid members is cool, however, with four times the membership of the Tory Party, I don't think they were four times more effective electorally. I'm not sure votes are swung by people knocking on doors and pushing leaflets through letterboxes - IMHO.
 
You could be right, but we were talking about the Tories' ability to create a version of Momentum, not how effective they are: and the Tories just don't have the numbers.
 
I thought that stuff was for getting known supporters to actually vote, rather than change minds.
Usually - but also for getting a new or possibly unknown policy with specific local impact out there. Tailoring the issues to highlight in specific areas is one way of producing new voters rather than just encouraging existing supporters. The new labour manifesto provided loads of opps for that.
 
You could be right, but we were talking about the Tories' ability to create a version of Momentum, not how effective they are: and the Tories just don't have the numbers.

It would seem to me that the Tories would struggle to create their own version of Momentum because that movement is comprised of people who wanted to take the Labour more to the left and found a figurehead who they thought represented that aspiration. I don't think there is a candidate (a popular one at least) in the Tory Party who wants to move further to the right, whenever they do they lose. If anything they seem to want to move onto the ground of new Labour in the hope that Labour is vacating it as they move further to the left.
 
It would seem to me that the Tories would struggle to create their own version of Momentum because that movement is comprised of people who wanted to take the Labour more to the left and found a figurehead who they thought represented that aspiration. I don't think there is a candidate (a popular one at least) in the Tory Party who wants to move further to the right, whenever they do they lose. If anything they seem to want to move onto the ground of new Labour in the hope that Labour is vacating it as they move further to the left.
If you were planning an extension to the back of your house would you make sure to knock down the front at the same time? Or would you prefer a larger house overall?
 
It would seem to me that the Tories would struggle to create their own version of Momentum because that movement is comprised of people who wanted to take the Labour more to the left and found a figurehead who they thought represented that aspiration. I don't think there is a candidate (a popular one at least) in the Tory Party who wants to move further to the right, whenever they do they lose. If anything they seem to want to move onto the ground of new Labour in the hope that Labour is vacating it as they move further to the left.
I don't think there is a similar group of currently unrepresented supporters on the right, just waiting for an exciting new tory leader to fire them up, more to the point.
 
I also don't think political parties operate as exact mirrors of each other, and a mass membership isn't something they necessarily need to win elections.
 
I don't think there is a similar group of currently unrepresented supporters on the right, just waiting for an exciting new tory leader to fire them up, more to the point.
i too hope a tory leader would seize the opportunity to bring back burning at the stake for fascists. but i don't think it's on the cards.
 
I also don't think political parties operate as exact mirrors of each other, and a mass membership isn't something they necessarily need to win elections.

I was wondering about this. Given the tories ability to raise more than sufficient funds from donors and the way people access information increasingly how important is having a large grass routes movement to them? It seems to me something that will always be more important to Labour especially if they continue down this route because they will have to rely on numerous small donations for funding.
 
So where are the new tories going to come from ? Cannot see much sloppage from UKIP crashing and burning as not that many kippers seem to be politcally engaged enough, Not many fucked off labour members left to jump ship - they are well gone already. The Lib dem vermin have precious little to spare.the disparate rightist groups meh

is there a bulge of privately educated yoot coming along who have inherited their self made parents lust for success?

any ideas ?
 
Sure, the last GE showed what an large and active membership can do and this is an area that the Tories are weak on. But they aren't going to become a minor party and they can still pull in large number of voters even with a small base.

It is an area for concern for them but I really dislike these 'oh the demographics will kill off X' arguments. Beside being shown to be false time and time again they (as JTG pointed out above) ignore the fact that people's outlook/positions change, and change in response to material conditions.
I certainly agree that they do change, over time. But equally, the common assumption, that people always move to the right, as they grow older, is to my mind, equally glib, and questionable.
It's certainly true for many, but by no means all, or even most of us.
If anything, I for one am more left wing than in my teens
 
Back
Top Bottom