BBC graphic of how it sees the Parliamentary arithmetic:Gotta say that I make that
Con alliance 299 - 1 deputy speaker = 298*
Oppo alliance 343 -2 dip speakers = 341
+ 1 Speaker
+ 7 SF
Tot = 650
*although suspended alleged tory sex offender Elphicke will vote with the Con alliance.
In terms of actual fire-power in a VoNC-type vote I suspect that Johnson might pick up a few 'rebels' & possibly a few 'indeps' like Austin etc...so prob. about 305-310?
Gotta say that I make that
Con alliance 299 - 1 deputy speaker = 298*
Oppo alliance 343 -2 dip speakers = 341
+ 1 Speaker
+ 7 SF
Tot = 650
*although suspended alleged tory sex offender Elphicke will vote with the Con alliance.
In terms of actual fire-power in a VoNC-type vote I suspect that Johnson might pick up a few 'rebels' & possibly a few 'indeps' like Austin etc...so prob. about 305-310?
watI DO wish people would use more credible sources than the New British Communist Party's (formerly the Labour Party) propaganda wing.
WTF is that Mogg like in his fuck you recline
you're sounding like a tory here.I DO wish people would use more credible sources than the New British Communist Party's (formerly the Labour Party) propaganda wing.
My favourite so far
What did you mean here Gaia ?I DO wish people would use more credible sources than the New British Communist Party's (formerly the Labour Party) propaganda wing.
Well they still are really aren't they. Even now how many of them would vote against the Tories in the VoNC, none.BBC graphic of how it sees the Parliamentary arithmetic:
Love how the state broadcaster still can't bring itself to admit that the 21 newly created independents are no longer Conservatives.
Really, if actually put to the test of VoNCing or ND, I'm not sure of that now. I reckon a fair few of them are so far detached/alienated from their party that they'd actually do it. Call me naive, but the recriminations on both sides of the internecine war were so visceral last night, I think there has been a split.Well they still are really aren't they. Even now how many of them would vote against the Tories in the VoNC, none.
Well they still are really aren't they. Even now how many of them would vote against the Tories in the VoNC, none.
My favourite so far
Are we meant to notice the unfortunate shadow manifesting directly and only under Mogg's nose?According in Ben Bradley, it's because you can't hear the back benches from the front so you *have* to recline.
Link:
Sajid Javid outlines spending plans after Boris Johnson's PMQs - BBC News
Beyond parody.
I DO wish people would use more credible sources than the New British Communist Party's (formerly the Labour Party) propaganda wing.
I DO wish people would use more credible sources than the New British Communist Party's (formerly the Labour Party) propaganda wing.
Guessing that is the increase from 328 to 329 since yesterdayExcellent; kick her out!