Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Therese Coffey Health Secretary your time is up

No she isn't.
The electorate did not make her health secretary.
Please read the thread title.
This thread is not about Coffrey per se.
It is about Coffrey as health secretary.
As soon as she changes her job title, the issues about her life style evaporate.
Did these supposed issues about her lifestyle matter when she was at the helm of a department that caused, hastened, and wilfully ignored multiple deaths?
 
Sad indeed.


It was no miracle, but for a few hours – heating, cooling, resting, letting go – I felt a peace I rarely felt elsewhere. It’s a cliche to talk about the diversity of bodies you see in a place like this (it’s true, there are piercings, muscles, varicose veins, scars, hair and no hair) but it was the drip, drip, drip effect of being around women quietly treating themselves with simple kindness that did something quite profound for me. It still does: when the self-loathing resurfaces (and it does occasionally), I know a quiet hour or two letting the soft animal of my body feel warm around others doing the same.

I haven’t been to the Porchester since its 2019 refurb; I hope it’s kept its heart. I see there’s a concession rate for pensioners and people on carers’ and disability allowance; that’s good, because these places weren’t intended to be the preserve of people who can afford a three-hour Balinese rejuvenating ritual. They were for anyone who wanted to give their body a few hours of warmth and kindness. Surely we need that now more than ever.


These facilities highlight the kind of integrated approach to the promotion of wellbeing I spoke of earlier, that a health secretary working with other departments could be taking on, defending, expanding. This one never will.
 
Sad indeed.


It was no miracle, but for a few hours – heating, cooling, resting, letting go – I felt a peace I rarely felt elsewhere. It’s a cliche to talk about the diversity of bodies you see in a place like this (it’s true, there are piercings, muscles, varicose veins, scars, hair and no hair) but it was the drip, drip, drip effect of being around women quietly treating themselves with simple kindness that did something quite profound for me. It still does: when the self-loathing resurfaces (and it does occasionally), I know a quiet hour or two letting the soft animal of my body feel warm around others doing the same.

I haven’t been to the Porchester since its 2019 refurb; I hope it’s kept its heart. I see there’s a concession rate for pensioners and people on carers’ and disability allowance; that’s good, because these places weren’t intended to be the preserve of people who can afford a three-hour Balinese rejuvenating ritual. They were for anyone who wanted to give their body a few hours of warmth and kindness. Surely we need that now more than ever.


These facilities highlight the kind of integrated approach to the promotion of wellbeing I spoke of earlier, that a health secretary working with other departments could be taking on, defending, expanding. This one never will.
These facilities have never had anything to do with the doh, as the word municipal indicates
 
Oh ffs yourself, you're on about central govt ignoring that these Turkish baths have never had any relationship with Whitehall
No, I'm not 'on about that' at all. And I did know what municipal meant before you explained. Are you drunk or something?

I said that a health service should be about wellness more generally, and that these kinds of spaces are an example of the kind of approach to that which could be looked at by anyone with any stake in health.
 
Are fat people ok to be teachers? Nurses? Parents?
Where is the line drawn?
What roles should fat people be allowed and disallowed to have Tanya1982 SysOut?
Need your health-concerned guidance.

Still wondering if her obesity and ~lifestyle~ mattered when she presided over the department that caused, hastened and wilfully ignored the deaths of multiple people?
 
The think about posts here is they don't repeat what's been said because that'd be really really boring.
Yeah, I know the feeling. You've bored me senseless with your belligerence and willful misunderstandings. If you're having a drink, then fair enough. Otherwise, you're just being fucking tiresome for the sake of it.
 
No, I'm not 'on about that' at all. And I did know what municipal meant before you explained. Are you drunk or something?

I said that a health service should be about wellness more generally, and that these kinds of spaces are an example of the kind of approach to that which could be looked at by anyone with any stake in health.
That's rather different from what you said
 
Yeah, I know the feeling. You've bored me senseless with your belligerence and willful misunderstandings. If you're having a drink, then fair enough. Otherwise, you're just being fucking tiresome for the sake of it.
Yeh those are obviously the only two options. If you've a mind so limited it thinks that fatshaming is a proper political argument.
 
Pharmacists who have done some extra training and can assess patients are entirely suitable to prescribe antibiotics, as are many other HCPs who do a prescribing course. Having other places that patients can access primary care services is a good thing, and has been happening for ages anyway, there were loads of pharmacists on my prescribing course. I'd want to see more details before flipping out and thinking this is a terrible idea. There is also sometimes a tinge of job protectionism from some doctors in this area ime.

(Speaking as a non-doctor prescriber.)

That’s assuming Coffey intends to ensure this training is provided rather than a free for all OTC antibiotic nightmare like I’ve seen on the Indian subcontinent. There, pharmacists sell antibiotics by the tablet. If you’re skint, why continue paying to finish the course of antibiotics when you feel better and can spend that money on food? A few more years of Tory misrule and we wont be far from that scenario, accelerating terrifying resistance the the remain drugs we have.
 
Last edited:
yes and no.

yes, council services are not (directly) controlled by whitehall, but local authority finance is heavily controlled by whitehall who hand out grant money on a fairly incomprehensible basis, set what councils are legally required to do (and in consequence, which services are discretionary and therefore easier to cut) and limit councils' legal powers to increase council tax etc.

the cameron government's 'localism' agenda was all balls - basically, cut councils' funding from central government, and blame councils for 'making cuts'

there's not enough joined up thinking between (NHS) health and (council) social care, and not sure the idea even exists in westminster / whitehall to consider the wider benefits and value (rather than just the cost) of other services that can influence health and well-being.

services including parks, libraries, and provision of adequate bus services so people can get to them, all have health / wellbeing benefits.

On a more personal level, better council maintenance of pavements would have saved the NHS the cost of repairs to mum-tat when she tripped on a dodgy paving stone last year. and would have made something of a difference to her well-being...
 
yes and no.

yes, council services are not (directly) controlled by whitehall, but local authority finance is heavily controlled by whitehall who hand out grant money on a fairly incomprehensible basis, set what councils are legally required to do (and in consequence, which services are discretionary and therefore easier to cut) and limit councils' legal powers to increase council tax etc.

the cameron government's 'localism' agenda was all balls - basically, cut councils' funding from central government, and blame councils for 'making cuts'

there's not enough joined up thinking between (NHS) health and (council) social care, and not sure the idea even exists in westminster / whitehall to consider the wider benefits and value (rather than just the cost) of other services that can influence health and well-being.

services including parks, libraries, and provision of adequate bus services so people can get to them, all have health / wellbeing benefits.

On a more personal level, better council maintenance of pavements would have saved the NHS the cost of repairs to mum-tat when she tripped on a dodgy paving stone last year. and would have made something of a difference to her well-being...
Westminster legislates mandatory and discretionary local authority activities, Whitehall doesn't. About ten years ago councils were handed health responsibilities with no increase in funding, there needs to be a proper review of what each tier does and rearrangement of funding to allow this to occur. ((((Mum-tat)))) :(
 
Back
Top Bottom