PTK
Paul Kegan
I don't remember that one.It reminds me of this 'stunning' picture which was so beloved of the masses in the 1960s
View attachment 442016
I don't remember that one.It reminds me of this 'stunning' picture which was so beloved of the masses in the 1960s
View attachment 442016
Because it was a statue.An old one and not mine.
But somebody once destroyed the arms of the sacred come to life statue of our Lady of Knock with an axe, the question is why didn’t she move out of the way.
Man you guys are hilarious.
Are there, or have there been, and religions that engage in idolatry? How do we define idolatry?Because it was a statue.
The figures were sculpted by the renowned Italian sculptor, Professor Lorenzo Ferri in 1960. The statuary was commissioned by the Knock Shrine Society.
The apparition at Knock took place in 1879.
It was not "statue come to life"..;because there were no statues. They were built 81 years later to represent what was seen by 15 people.
Eta...we Irish Catholics usually prefer to blow up statues of public figures than those of Mary. I think your "story" is about the Pentacostalist (Protestants) who damaged the statue of Our Lady at Ballinspittle because they were protesting against "Idolatry" (which isn't actually what Catholocs do)
Are there, or have there been, and religions that engage in idolatry? How do we define idolatry?
This portrait is quite stunning
Has anyone literally worshipped a statue?The biblical remonstrance was apparently against those who literally worshipped statues, the golden calf, the golden statue in the book of Daniel etc.
I'd imagine so back in the iron age.Has anyone literally worshipped a statue?
Has anyone literally worshipped a statue?
I stand corrected and enlightened. I simply had a vague memory of a stand up routine I once heard.Because it was a statue.
The figures were sculpted by the renowned Italian sculptor, Professor Lorenzo Ferri in 1960. The statuary was commissioned by the Knock Shrine Society.
The apparition at Knock took place in 1879.
It was not "statue come to life"..;because there were no statues. They were built 81 years later to represent what was seen by 15 people.
Eta...we Irish Catholics usually prefer to blow up statues of public figures than those of Mary. I think your "story" is about the Pentacostalist (Protestants) who damaged the statue of Our Lady at Ballinspittle because they were protesting against "Idolatry" (which isn't actually what Catholocs do)
People today put garlands of flowers on statues.It's unclear whether the ancients thought that the objects of their worship were just symbols or were literally some kind of physical incarnation of the gods. Probably opinions differed. They certainly placed great value on the objects, dressing them in fine clothes etc.
It's just a nice picture. No one would think it's a St Luke or Raphael..That's AI dude. There is no humanity in there at all.
(for more tangible evidence, see the hands)
It's just a nice picture. No one would think it's a St Luke or Raphael..
Well said. I agree with you.You said it was 'quite stunning'. It's a simulacrum of art. An averaged value with no intent or imagination behind it. To put it in more religious terms, it's soulless. Art isn't just a surface level image, it's an act of interpretation... Think that's also sort of what pisses me off about the Luke myth; what the artwork actually is, who painted it and why, its fundamental humanity is just flattened out and wedged into a Luke-shaped hole.
So, it’s not “stunning” after all, then? You retract that?Well said. I agree with you.
It's visually appealing. It's not great art & now that the air has has let out of my balloon by the Urban cynics, yes; it is not stunning....So, it’s not “stunning” after all, then? You retract that?
She's eating for two!She has a lot of Feast Days!
Feasts of the Blessed Virgin Mary | MaryPages
Feasts Days of the Blessed Virgin Mary.www.marypages.com
Bart Ehrman sez the whole concept of the virgin birth was unimportant to early Christianity. Only happens in Matthew and Luke and the former is just about prophesy fulfilment.
Well saidIt's unclear whether the ancients thought that the objects of their worship were just symbols or were literally some kind of physical incarnation of the gods. Probably opinions differed. They certainly placed great value on the objects, dressing them in fine clothes etc.
He's not protestant. He's an agnostic biblical scholar.Protestant claptrap. Lord Cromwell would give this post a
Even Martin Luther didn't believe this
Roman Catholics have been known to clothe statues of saints.Well said