Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The stupidity of the anti-vaxx nutcases

I do not consent, I do not comply. They dragged me out of the shower and handcuffed me.
I do not consent, I do not comply. They dragged me out of the shower and handcuffed me.
:D Superb! The arch-nobber Piers Corbyn has slogans like "do not consent, do not comply" on the inside of his jacket, like an anti-vax flasher.

I love the idea that these sovereign freemen genuinely seem to believe that by uttering these phrases, the forces of the State will back off and apologise politely in the face of these powerful magical incantations.
They strike me as people who have never had any interactions with the police that were less than polite and amicable...
 
I do not consent, I do not comply. They dragged me out of the shower and handcuffed me.

:D Superb! The arch-nobber Piers Corbyn has slogans like "do not consent, do not comply" on the inside of his jacket, like an anti-vax flasher.

I love the idea that these sovereign freemen genuinely seem to believe that by uttering these phrases, the forces of the State will back off and apologise politely in the face of these powerful magical incantations.
They strike me as people who have never had any interactions with the police that were less than polite and amicable...

The really mad bit is that they still seem to believe it even after they've tried it and seen the results. :confused:
 
This is absolutely true isn't it, there's a very strange volunteer martyrdom about the whole thing, wouldn't surprise me if John Eyers is already being held as some latter-day Jesus in some very odd circles.

some of them are entirely of the opinion to be refused access to somewhere, service is a massive infringement on their rights. they have fully signed up to the individualistic consumer, customer is always right. Special you’re worth it wank. The atomisation, rational consumer unit philosophy of late capitalism.

some of them that is. It is always worth realising not all people against taking the vaccine antivaccers. A point that has been made before, but it’s a bit close to home so felt like saying.
 
Similar things could be said for a lot of postings on this forum, but for some reason I don't see anyone telling anyone else not to make posts bashing the Tories.
Kabbes Point is valid. We all need told now and then. And yeah if you’re up at the small hours winding yourself up about Tories. Probably time to re-evaluate your use of media and the Internet. Just for your own sake.
By which I don’t mean you. Generic.
Or troll the fuck out of them…
 
I'm a big fan of the "ambassador at large and advocate of Kingdom Filipina Hacienda" bit, I might get business cards made up saying that. I was wondering if some very confused Singaporean coppers got a lecture on the Magna Carta as well?
 
to be fair it is quite possible that he is going through some mental health issues, the fact that a letter from his family is what tipped the judge to send him for evaluation would point to that.
So possibly more a victim of the FOTL lot.
Still make for funny reading though.
 
In the UK where this sovereign freemen nonsense seems most prevalent (is it a thing in other countries?) I wonder what proportion of magistrates and judges have encountered this ‘defence’? Can imagine a magistrate at the start of a long day being faced with this bollocks sighing to her / himself and muttering “Oh Christ another FOTL dickhead, here we f***ing go again”
 
In the UK where this sovereign freemen nonsense seems most prevalent (is it a thing in other countries?) I wonder what proportion of magistrates and judges have encountered this ‘defence’? Can imagine a magistrate at the start of a long day being faced with this bollocks sighing to her / himself and muttering “Oh Christ another FOTL dickhead, here we f***ing go again”
It started in Canada and has spread to the US and Australia too.

Freeman on the land - Wikipedia
 
In the UK where this sovereign freemen nonsense seems most prevalent (is it a thing in other countries?) I wonder what proportion of magistrates and judges have encountered this ‘defence’? Can imagine a magistrate at the start of a long day being faced with this bollocks sighing to her / himself and muttering “Oh Christ another FOTL dickhead, here we f***ing go again”
I think I remember reading that there have been 1k or so cases with not a single one being successful.
 
I knew someone who lost their house due to the fotl, they were vulnerable and some massive dick latched onto them claiming to be a lawyer, advised them into financial meltdown then fucked off when they were repossessed

Fucksake. :mad:

Out of curiosity did the FOTLer type directly defraud them or was it more just pushing these stupid ideas on them?
 
In America they are considered a threat to cops. As they can have guns .

Isn't that a slightly different thing in that to them it's more of an ideological belief that they're prepared to defend with violence rather than believing they've discovered some sort of ancient magic? So more realistic in a way, for all that they're dangerous armed loons.
 
Sorry a bit disconnected with what you're discussing but I am really curious, who has got an answer for how come higher income countries are more likely to be 'sceptical' about vaccine safety & efficiency?

Looked it up because am curious how come the Swiss are so anti vax and found this.

It is full of surprising things.
eg) "There is no obvious global relationship between levels of science education and vaccine confidence. . In some places – like Northern Europe and Northern America – people with higher levels of science education are less likely to either strongly or somewhat disagree with the statement that vaccines are safe. "
 
Sorry a bit disconnected with what you're discussing but I am really curious, who has got an answer for how come higher income countries are more likely to be 'sceptical' about vaccine safety & efficiency?
I mean, this is just off the top of my head, but I'm guessing maybe "lower income countries are more likely to have recent memories of diseases being eliminated by successful vaccine programs"? Like, I feel that maybe stuff like the big anti-tuberculosis, polio, and smallpox campaigns are not so much a part of recent memory in Europe but might be more recent outside it? I think?
 
Yep i think that is probably playing a part.
Trust in scientists, in general, and doctors & nurses particularly, seems to be the most reliable indicator they've identified, for people feeling that vaccines are safe. which trust is lower in richer countries possibly because we take access to healthcare more for granted and are more critical of services provided (?)
OR is it just access to youtube :hmm:
 
There's an over-abundance of hippy-dippy nature-worshipping horseshit in a lot of developed Western countries. I reckon that it's easier to think "natural=good" and "artificial=evil" when you don't have to worry about the weather destroying your harvest.
It's children's cartoon narrative baddy vs goody stuff. In this case natural vs, eh, unnatural.

(isn't everything "natural" ?)
 
Yep i think that is probably playing a part.
Trust in scientists, in general, and doctors & nurses particularly, seems to be the most reliable indicator they've identified, for people feeling that vaccines are safe. which trust is lower in richer countries possibly because we take access to healthcare more for granted and are more critical of services provided (?)
OR is it just access to youtube :hmm:

I think the root is a combination of healthcare being taken for a granted, and a really advanced consumerist society where people expect absolutely everything to be a personal preference thing.
 
Some of the variations within similar countries are also interesting; the difference between the UK, and then Germany were quackery is widespread among doctors and mainstream medical care for example. (A friend of mine in Berlin changed their GP after his clinic started to post anti-vax and covid skeptical stuff on their website.) The NHS obviously makes a difference, as does the regulation and structure in which healthcare generally operates here.
 
Yep. France is number one in the world for anti vax attitudes, whilst we are pretty good here.
It is all quite interesting. Trajectory doesn’t look good if things continue as they are, a few bits out there on how childhood vaccination rates have plateaued in sub Saharan Africa in recent years due to rising hesitancy.
 
Fucksake. :mad:

Out of curiosity did the FOTLer type directly defraud them or was it more just pushing these stupid ideas on them?
As far as I know it was the latter that did the damage but undoubtably the former was happening to some extent as the guy was clearly parasitic.
They were vulnerable to it because they couldn't pay the mortgage and then rather than getting sensible financial advice went down the rabbit hole.
 
I mean, this is just off the top of my head, but I'm guessing maybe "lower income countries are more likely to have recent memories of diseases being eliminated by successful vaccine programs"? Like, I feel that maybe stuff like the big anti-tuberculosis, polio, and smallpox campaigns are not so much a part of recent memory in Europe but might be more recent outside it? I think?
THIS. We have more-or-less eliminated diseases like polio so we don't see relatives, friends, colleagues, neighbours etc who have been damaged by these illnesses, and (unlike 100 years ago) we don't know of family members who died from these diseases (e.g. one of my late Mum's brothers died of Spanish flu aged 8).

In developing world countries where the evidence for how terrible these diseases are is all around (e.g. an aunt or grandparent etc who is disabled by polio, or the knowledge is within living memory, that's a strong impetus for getting vaccinated. I seem to recall Bangladesh had a very high rate of 'compliance', 90%+

Anti-vaxx campaigns and beliefs are a pointless and dangerous luxury of the bored affluent West
 
I think I remember reading that there have been 1k or so cases with not a single one being successful.
You'd think that would be some sort of deterrent to someone who decides to mount a defence based on this gibberish: "Does it work? Has anyone ever got a not guilty using this argument?" "Er no man, but they were successful morally / on the astral level"
 
You'd think that would be some sort of deterrent to someone who decides to mount a defence based on this gibberish: "Does it work? Has anyone ever got a not guilty using this argument?" "Er no man, but they were successful morally / on the astral level"
It's a fairly typical feature of conspiracy theory/loonery that there is no feedback from the output back to the input. So, when their preferred strategy doesn't work, there will always be some external factor that they can fold into their theory to account for the fact that it didn't work. What is inconceivable is that the theory has somehow failed in practice.
 
Back
Top Bottom