Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

the sir jimmy savile obe thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
They probably knew they were dealing with someone flattered by 'power', so indulged him to get a dialogue going. In much the same way as Louis did. Can't fathom why he'd want to spend nights staying with him after the interview - it could have been he was intrigued by the grotesque character in a journalistic way.
 
I think they had no legal power to compel him to answer questions - he wasn't under arrest. Some of that obsequiousness might be justifiable in an exploratory interview - get him talking, start building a profile, see if he fills the silence and gives something away (which he did, pretty much). Maybe come back a few days later to 'clarify a few things' and then start up with the Sweeney stuff. But that would have to be a strategy that was part of a serious, planned investigation, which it dosen't seem like they were doing. We know that Savile's friend in the police had tried to lean on them not to investigate at all, and in that light it doesn't read well at all.
 
Is there a Masonic connection, then? I mean, as part of this business, rather than circumstantially/wild speculation-wise?
There is no masonic connection with the united grand lodge of England (UGLE). Chelsea Lodge is the entertainers lodge and he was never a member or visitor to that lodge.

I think the confusion comes from some award he was given by the pope, it has a similar sounding name to one of the side degrees or chapters in freemasonry, iirc he was given the order of Malta by the pope and there are the knights of Malta in freemasonry.

It doesn't take much of a jump for people to make a link that isn't there, just look at the McCann thread ;)
 
There is no masonic connection with the united grand lodge of England (UGLE). Chelsea Lodge is the entertainers lodge and he was never a member or visitor to that lodge.

I think the confusion comes from some award he was given by the pope, it has a similar sounding name to one of the side degrees or chapters in freemasonry, iirc he was given the order of Malta by the pope and there are the knights of Malta in freemasonry.

It doesn't take much of a jump for people to make a link that isn't there, just look at the McCann thread ;)

I think the confusion (if it is that) might also arise from the apparent protection he was afforded by the lodge known as WYP, and the fact that he evaded justice for so long. All sounds mightly Masonic, even if he weren't a formal member.

Incidentaly, how can you be so sure that he wasn't?:hmm:
 
I think the confusion (if it is that) might also arise from the apparent protection he was afforded by the lodge known as WYP, and the fact that he evaded justice for so long. All sounds mightly Masonic, even if he weren't a formal member.

Incidentaly, how can you be so sure that he wasn't?:hmm:
I personally am assured by a friend in Chelsea Lodge who I have known for years, but in his reply he also mentioned that Great Queens street had also issued a statement confirming that he was never a mason in UGLE.

Can you tell me more about the lodge named WYP, a quick look at the usually places doesn't show any such lodge under the United grand lodge. There are other forms of masonry, may be he was a member of one of them, but I am sure if it were so; we would have heard by now.

I'm not sure what relevance to the amount of time a person "evades justice" has to them being a Freemason :confused:
 
WYP=West Yorkshire Police
The only reference I can find is this "West Yorkshire Police Federation Sine Favore Lodge, No.9856" and they are strange sites (The ones I looked at). I can find no credible source that there was or is a west Yorkshire police lodge :confused:

I am sure that a number of WYP were masons but maybe the lodge has a different name, probably members of a number of lodges, that's the usual form with old bill in my experience .
 
The only reference I can find is this "West Yorkshire Police Federation Sine Favore Lodge, No.9856" and they are strange sites (The ones I looked at). I can find no credible source that there was or is a west Yorkshire police lodge :confused:

I am sure that a number of WYP were masons but maybe the lodge has a different name, probably members of a number of lodges, that's the usual form with old bill in my experience .
I did a little research, and could not find a lodge with such a name, either. Which doesn't entirely surprise me, because, while Lodges are often formed by people who work for a particular organisation or in a particular profession, it is not usual for them to lift in its entirety the name of the organisation and use it as the Lodge name. It does happen (particularly where Lodges might meet on the premises of the organisation - eg there are school and college Lodges), but I'd be rather surprised to see it happening like that with the police.

Great Queen Street is not much given to confirming or denying rumours about members (motto - "never complain, never explain"), so the fact that they have specifically stated that Savile was not a Freemason is significant. In any case, it seems to me that Savile was very much someone out for his own individual interests, and not remotely given to the kind of fraternal fellowship he'd have found in Freemasonry - they would probably have pissed him off more even than he would have pissed them off with his grandstanding and egotistical posturing, and - unlike the police, as we realise with hindsight - Freemasonry would have nothing to offer him that could obviously and immediately benefit him in his child abusing career.
 
I think the confusion (if it is that) might also arise from the apparent protection he was afforded by the lodge known as WYP, and the fact that he evaded justice for so long. All sounds mightly Masonic, even if he weren't a formal member.

Incidentaly, how can you be so sure that he wasn't?
WYP=West Yorkshire Police
i read brogdale's post as just referring to WYP having a large freemason membership? not that they had a specific lodge..
 
i read brogdale's post as just referring to WYP having a large freemason membership? not that they had a specific lodge..
Ah, he could be. I interpreted the phrase "afforded by the lodge known as WYP" as meaning that he was saying that a lodge called "WYP" existed. But it may well be that he's using slightly incorrect terminology, masonically speaking, and confusing yours truly in doing so :)

Most police forces do (or at least did) tend to be very well represented in Freemasonry, for all kinds of benign and logical reasons. I'm sure West Yorkshire Police are no exceptions. I'm still not sure that Savile would have fitted in at all well to Masonry, though.
 
Actually, some did. Some relayed personal experiences. And some gladly dismissed it all as fancyful; just as countless others must have done throughout his years of getting away with it. Jimmy fooled everyone.
 
exiledinwales said:
Workers tend to have an axe to grind with their class enemy.

But Jimmy was working class. He naturally rose to the highest stratum in his career path and rubbed shoulders with the other fuckers there as is expected of a psychopath.
 
I did a little research, and could not find a lodge with such a name, either. Which doesn't entirely surprise me, because, while Lodges are often formed by people who work for a particular organisation or in a particular profession, it is not usual for them to lift in its entirety the name of the organisation and use it as the Lodge name. It does happen (particularly where Lodges might meet on the premises of the organisation - eg there are school and college Lodges), but I'd be rather surprised to see it happening like that with the police.

Great Queen Street is not much given to confirming or denying rumours about members (motto - "never complain, never explain"), so the fact that they have specifically stated that Savile was not a Freemason is significant. In any case, it seems to me that Savile was very much someone out for his own individual interests, and not remotely given to the kind of fraternal fellowship he'd have found in Freemasonry - they would probably have pissed him off more even than he would have pissed them off with his grandstanding and egotistical posturing, and - unlike the police, as we realise with hindsight - Freemasonry would have nothing to offer him that could obviously and immediately benefit him in his child abusing career.
There are many work orientated lodges, Train drivers, tube drivers, bus drivers, miners, local authority, police, fireman, lawyers, bankers, uncle tom cobbley and all. Most trades and professions have lodges as do most hobbies.

I've never really understood why people who want to keep thing to themselves would open a lodge, why not just meet without the need for keeping a record of the meeting :confused:
 
1%er said:
There are many work orientated lodges, Train drivers, tube drivers, bus drivers, miners, local authority, police, fireman, lawyers, bankers, uncle tom cobbley and all. Most trades and professions have lodges as do most hobbies.

I've never really understood why people who want to keep thing to themselves would open a lodge, why not just meet without the need for keeping a record of the meeting :confused:

Because you get to find out the handshake.
 
Because you get to find out the handshake.
There are a number of pass-grips and passwords, also a number of phrases. The most common mistake is people using the wrong pass-grip or handshake, they are all freely available on the interweb. Just make sure you remember the "right" grip.
 
It was one incident in 1965 the former policeman remembers well.

Late one night, just before midnight, he noticed Jimmy Savile's Rolls Royce parked in a secluded spot on the edge of Roundhay Park.

"As I went past I saw the interior lights were on," he said. "I went past but stopped and went back - I thought someone had nicked it.

"He was sat in the driver's seat and was talking to a young lady in the passenger seat. She looked like Twiggy - I couldn't tell her age, perhaps 15 or 16.

"I said, 'What's the matter, Jimmy - what are you doing up here?'

"He said, 'Yeah, we're fine, aren't we?' And she smiled. Then he said, 'We're waiting for 12 o'clock, son.'

"Why?" I asked. 'Because it's her birthday tomorrow, she's 16.' And he winked at me.

"I asked the girl, 'Are you ok?'

"She smiled - there was no impression she was being forced to be there. I think she wanted me to get lost as well.

"Jimmy then said, 'Now get back on your bike before you lose your job.'"

The officer then went on his way. He said: "If there was any impression that she was 10 or 11 I wouldn't have gone anywhere. There was no doubt whatsoever that she knew what was going to happen.

"Savile gave me the impression he was justifying himself and knew what people suspected him of - he was waiting until it was legal. His attitude was, 'I'm not doing it now but in ten minutes there isn't a thing you can do about it.'"

Later on in the shift he mentioned the meeting to his sergeant, who said to him: "Was she upset?" When he replied, "No", he claims the senior officer added: "We know Jimmy likes them young, he's got friends in high places."

A recent West Yorkshire Police inquiry concluded that friendships Savile had with officers had not protected him from arrest or prosecution. But a recent review of that inquiry found it did not have the look or feel of an independent report.

Today West Yorkshire Police appealed for the police officer we spoke to today to contact them. The force released a statement that said: "West Yorkshire Police are appealing for a man who spoke to the media yesterday in relation to the Jimmy Savile case to get in touch."

But the former officer, who spoke on the Jeremy Vine Show yesterday, is adamant there was no special protection for Savile.

"There was no conspiracy, it wasn't covered up," he said. "They all knew Jimmy Savile liked them young - and we're not talking 12 - we're talking 15. It was the culture."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24564933
 
Maybe you have, if thinking that the OB might be masons for all kinds of (non)benign and (il)logical reasons.
They join in many cases for personal advancement and the chance to rub shoulders with the bosses. I'm sure many join other organizations and groupings for the same reason.
 
They join in many cases for personal advancement and the chance to rub shoulders with the bosses. I'm sure many join other organizations and groupings for the same reason.

You appear very confident that the OB join lodges for (relatively) benign, if essentially corrupt, reasons of self-advancement. How do you know this with such certainty?
 
You appear very confident that the OB join lodges for (relatively) benign, if essentially corrupt, reasons of self-advancement. How do you know this with such certainty?
They also join golf clubs and other things, I know this because I have met these people in a previous life.
 
Maybe you have, if thinking that the OB might be masons for all kinds of (non)benign and (il)logical reasons constitutes an AGENDA.:eek:
I rather assumed that you'd covered the "nefarious reasons" angle quite adequately yourself, and felt a little balance was called for. There are people in Freemasonry (and not just OB) ) who use it for nefarious reasons, but neither the organisation nor the people in it would tolerate either blatant or significant nefariousness for very long - this idea that Freemasonry is some kind of automatic "get out of jail free" card is a complete myth.
 
I rather assumed that you'd covered the "nefarious reasons" angle quite adequately yourself, and felt a little balance was called for. There are people in Freemasonry (and not just OB) ) who use it for nefarious reasons, but neither the organisation nor the people in it would tolerate either blatant or significant nefariousness for very long - this idea that Freemasonry is some kind of automatic "get out of jail free" card is a complete myth.

Setting 'agendas' aside, then.... you sound like you have some personal experience of the lodge?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom