Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Road Less Travelled: The History of Red Action

love detective

there's no love too small
The complete back catalogue of Red Action newspapers & bulletins are now online here

To accompany the back catalogue going online, The Road Less Travelled: The History of Red Action looks at the development of both the paper and the organisation as a whole from 1982 onwards

Most of the material from the old Red Action site has also been archived here as well

www.redactionarchive.org
 
Meant to quote a bit of the piece in the OP but forgot, here's the conclusion

Thirty years after RA was formed the need to bring the marginalised working class in from the cold is greater than ever. Just as predictably, conservative anti-fascism is moving in the opposite direction. Where previously we condemned the strategy of avoiding confronting the far-right physically, today the strategy for conservative anti-fascism is to avoid confronting the far-right politically.

And instead of politically engaging on the issues on working class estates, the most recent recommendation/boast of Hope not Hate is to establish ‘a firewall’ between the unskilled and unemployed sections of the white working class, where the BNP have some resonance, and the rest of the electorate. Not only is the plan to put significant sections of the population in electoral quarantine out of fear of how they might possibly vote redolent of the Six Counties prior to 1968 and the Jim Crow laws in the American Deep South, in this upside down world it is the middle class, fascism’s traditional social base, who need protecting from the contagion carried by the ‘people of no property’, who just as traditionally supplied anti-fascism’s doughtiest fighters.

Thirty years ago when RA railed against the SWP (the standard bearers of the time, lest not forget) for ceding a sales pitch to the NF in north London, we maintained that confronting the fascists remained ‘a key part of the class struggle’. This was not us being overly anxious about a localised capitulation: it was seen rightly as evidence of a readiness for further compromises down the line. Sure enough, three decades on, what is now being ceded is a core element of the British working class itself.

A Europe in economic crisis verging on the chronic, with societal intemperance matched by a loss of faith in democratic solutions among all classes, throws up at one end Greece, where unreconstructed national socialists are elected to parliament; and a less than shabby return of 6 million votes on a thirty year investment by the FN in France at the other. Meanwhile, as nationalist and proto-fascist parties climb all over the furniture near everywhere else (under PR even a struggling BNP would have dozens of MPs off the back of the results in 2010) the conservative Left remains hobbled with formations, priorities and tactics designed to fight the class war in a previous century, the chatter being all about international perspectives, buckled to a lordly disdain for any engagement in a sustained way with their titular constituency at home. As a snapshot of where we are now, it is as good as any.

And when comparing it to a snapshot of the 1930s it does initially reassure that generally (with Greece being a possible exception) we are nowhere near yet. But on closer inspection the apparent tranquillity might just be down to the fact that one of the previous protagonists - an organised and politicised working class - is missing; marked absent. And because in Britain as elsewhere at present the political centre, and by extension as they see it, the whole of society appears to be threatened from only one end of the spectrum it encourages an overweening anti-fascism to smugly believe that it enjoys the support of the silent majority, and will moreover always do so. It may well do for the moment, (though opinion polls suggest even that is debatable) but if push comes to shove, what the near total isolation of the anti-fascist militants in Germany’s Weimar Republic, or the mere 0.6 per cent of the French population who were officially registered as ‘resisters’ tells us, is that this sort of cross-class consensus is historically ephemeral or brittle and so the prudent always provision for a time where effective anti-fascism may once again prove to be a minority pursuit. It also tells us something else. Should the warning signs go unheeded and events do take a turn for the worse, it is unlikely the few who stood their ground will ever get to say ‘we told you so’.

Giving quarter in places like Chapel Market rarely has visible consequences in the short term. But tiny betrayals beget bigger ones. And even though wholescale capitulation might not begin with an immediate avalanche of support for the far-right – that’s how it invariably ends.
 
Apolitical boot boys... blah blah... posturing prima donnas... drone drone...macho poseurs... yap yap... self aggrandising bullies... yada yada...
 
Good stuff.

I think it is worth noting that in the future they will be recognised as the Marxist organsition that got their key analysis right and early one than anyone else.
 
fucking fantastic LD, much appreciated here! looks great and lots of effort but like the AFA archive, it needs documenting before it disappears into crumbs. cheers!
 
'Right up until issue 64, copies of RA were produced by hours of typing followed by cut and paste, all put together in cramped, damp, poorly lit basements or in a member’s living room.'

ah! the days of pritt stick and scissors! this is a great archive and i really should be doing other stuff!
 
What's prompted the making of the facebook page?

Admin says it's to prompt discussion - I'd guess it's also a case of controlling your own history - makes it harder for others to lay claim to/misrepresent RA & its traditions on social media, maybe? (either that or there's a Greatest Hits Christmas reunion tour planned)
 
The history article deals with the IWCA without mentioning its near disappearance or attempting to provide any analysis any lessons of its life and death. At a certain point that becomes actively disingenuous.

That point aside, good work to whoever was involved in digitising all of those documents. Agree with them or not, Red Action did produce material worth reading and it would be a shame to have it all disappear bar a few mildewed copies in ex-member's attics.
 
Last edited:
The history article deals with the IWCA without mentioning its near disappearance or attempting to provide any analysis any lessons of its life and death. At a certain point that becomes actively disingenuous.

"We have nothing to learn from the IWCA." (Socialist Alliance - 2002) What has changed?
 
My understanding is that there will be a full report back from the IWCA project

Obvs I don't speak for them or have anything to do with it myself
 
I saw a discussion on Facebook of IWCA's stance towards multiculturalism and saw this comment:

"Well, I am old enough to remember what it was like before "multiculturalism" and you are talking proletarian bollocks. Red Action were OK for street fighting but fuck all use for anything else."

Written by a socialist :D
 
Are you suggesting there are marked differences between the politics, methodology and visible appeal of TuSC and the SA?

I'm sure there are many. But accusing others of not learning from an experience you yourselves have yet to draw any balance sheet from seems somewhat skewed. And doing so based on a quote from the wrong organisation seems either actively dishonest or simply sloppy.
 
Last edited:
I saw a discussion on Facebook of IWCA's stance towards multiculturalism and saw this comment:

"Well, I am old enough to remember what it was like before "multiculturalism" and you are talking proletarian bollocks. Red Action were OK for street fighting but fuck all use for anything else."

Written by a socialist :D

'OK' - 'for street fighting?'


High praise indeed.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure there are many. But accusing others of not learning from an experience you yourselves have yet to draw any balance sheet from seems somewhat skewed. And doing so based on a quote from the wrong organisation seems either actively dishonest or simply sloppy.

Has it never struck you as odd, that what might be described as your near obsession with the publication of the 'balance sheet' (how many times across different threads have you insisted on 'your right to know' anyway?) is not matched by even the teeniest display of curiosity by your compatriots in this country? No?

OK, let me spell it out for you: the 2002 'we have nothing to learn from the IWCA' edict was not exclusive to the SA, which was most of the left anyway. It was uniform across the Left then. And it remains uniform across the Left today.

Needless to say there is no need to ask how that is working out for them is there as we already know.

When we deem the time is right we will be more than happy to 'open the books' so to speak.

For the reasons outlined we see no real urgency to do anything pro-active before that.
 
Has it never struck you as odd, that what might be described as your near obsession with the publication of the 'balance sheet' (how many times across different threads have you insisted on 'your right to know' anyway?) is not matched by even the teeniest display of curiosity by your compatriots in this country? No?
ou
As I have no involvement with the English and Welsh SP's tactical decisions and priorities, no, it really hasn't. However, I am in an organisation that does a huge amount of community focused activity over here, and believe it or not, the experiences of your organisation in doing that sort of thing one island over are of interest - the things that worked, the things that didn't, how durable efforts where, how spreadable or repeatable they were, what answers you came up with, what supposed solutions failed, what political compromises you made in terms of pushing broader politics, what political compromises you didn't make, etc, etc. This stuff is actually of genuine, no taking the piss, no point scoring, interest to me.

Secondly, I do, of course have a more "combative" reason for mentioning it (although far from being "near-obsessed", I think I've only ever mentioned it on a handful of IWCA/RA/AFA related threads here because I only come across your lot here). It was one thing being lectured to about the new way forward 10 years plus ago. It's asking a bit much to expect people to sit still for the same thing now as if it was still ten or fifteen years ago, as if the IWCA hadn't been set up, had some successes and faded. Dishing it out to the rest of the left is one thing, but you lot have a very thin skin when it comes to taking anything back with good grace.

But the main reason, and I'm not being disingenuous is that I actually think it's of interest. And no, I don't think you owe me an answer specifically, but I do think you owe the people you've been advocating the IWCA approach to a balance sheet of that experience more than another exhortation or more chest beating about how you were right. That way, people might actually be able to use the IWCA to help develop something that does spread, that does last, etc. Which was after all what you were supposed to be about, wasn't it? Hence "pilot schemes"?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom