She's mouthing terms she doesn't really understand - "you've got to have burden of proof" (repeated about a thousand times). Er, no, we have "burden of proof" - that's how our criminal justice system works.What you're ineptly trying to say, Priti bloody scary Patel, is that we need to have proof beyond doubt.
And we all know where she would go with that as Home Sec. Her notion of "beyond doubt" would probably end up being below that current level of "beyond doubt", just so she could get some of that lovely deterrence going on.
I never used to be as opposed to capital punishment as I am now, but even when I was somewhat agnostic about it, I found the urgent desire of some of its proponents to have it back just a little uncomfortable to be around...