Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

the neoliberal vision of the future

A useful analogy, I find, is that of a denial of service attack.

In a DoS attack the server takes time to figure out what to do with each deliberately broken packet sent to it. Send enough broken packets, which are easily and cheaply generated by a botnet, and the server becomes unavailable.

Similarly it takes the human equivalent of such a bot much less time and effort to copy and paste shite from some wingnut welfare site than it does to carefully demonstrate the flawed logic and misrepresented facts contained in that shite.

Yep - the scattergun approach - beloved of conspiracy theorists and young earth creationists. You can often spot it because they use different colours and fonts for the bits they've c&p'd from elsewhere.
 
i find the fact that the fuckers he was quoting hold university positions staggering and very depressing

Me too - I don't think I've come across any yet but then again how would you know? Surely their biases must affect what they teach - if they're willing to put their reputations at risk by publishing that crap they'll surely be willing to use their privileged positions to indoctrinate students.
 
Being an academic is no guard against being an incompetent fuckwit! This is especially true of those who publish outside their own field, but I've seen shocking stuff published by very competent authors simply because it's the conclusion the customer was paying for (the inevitable consequence of privatising research funding). If you can manipulate your skills for money, you can sure as hell manipulate them to make dodgy arguments that attract you as an individual.

Being acknowledged experts in their field (if they are - it is by no means true of the majority) can also lead them to be under-aware of their weaknesses in other fields.
 
Being acknowledged experts in their field (if they are - it is by no means true of the majority) can also lead them to be under-aware of their weaknesses in other fields.

This can never be repeated enough times. It's also worth noting the influence of private funders in academia, particularly in the USA. Plenty of rich white male batshit fuckwits out there who are eager to curb the socialist/fascist/commie/islamic tide that is apparently choking free inquiry and free thought. Even academically prestigious institutions will take on some right nutters for enough cash.
 
i find the fact that the fuckers he was quoting hold university positions staggering and very depressing

Unsurprisingly, some of them wait until they have tenure and then start with the shit. These boys (and the majority of them are blokes) know how to play the game, that's for sure. :(
 
Yer man is back, bloggin' mental.

It is no understatement to say that hell almost broke loose. Then I was sosialdarwinist, racist and Nazi. Why racist? Because it follows a very logical necessity of the heritability of intelligence that there will be a tendency to be small differences in average intelligence between different races and ethnic groups. (This applies to all hereditary characteristics) Therefore, among other European Jews statistically significantly smarter than others and are thus statistically over-represented among the wealthy business people. (See Wall Street as dominated by Jews, the so-called oligarchs in Russia who are Jews and industrialists and financiers in Germany at the end of the 1800s, which also significantly were Jews.) There is no valuation in this, it is only a description of reality, but for a left intellectual is to recognize the biological differences in intelligence, synonymous with being racist.
 
LOL, link to the full thing pls.


It is no understatement to say that hell almost broke loose

pmsl. he got cunted off both intellectually and in the baser manner of simple insults. Both deserved. Thats not 'all hell' its the nature of P&P where people wake up with hangovers but still recon they were right last night.
 
See also the one about him going to Singapore with his mammy. Norway fuckin Bates people.

A few weeks ago my mother came to me and said "no, Onar, now you've been sick so long and these doctors in Norway is doing nothing so now it's time to get you to a proper health care. Now I take you to Singapore to get yourself examined from head to toe. I buy you.
I'm guessing that his mammy paid his way and that google translate arsed up a bit.
 
Ah, he's on long-term disability benefit. Norwegian doctors can't work out what's wrong with him, diagnosing him at various points as 'a waste of space', 'a useless individual' and, most recently, 'unemployable'.
 
So Onar is, in Randist terms, a second hander freeloader?

Here he shows that he's as self-aware as he is rational: "they tried to discredit me as a racist and even neo-Nazi, but I actually think I succeeded more in exposing them and their murky underlying attitudes."

Once again I gaze into my crystal ball and see a future that contains at least one of Onars sycophants posting on this thread.
 
My favourite bit is where he says that we dismissed the "research" when we found that the "researcher" made a "mistake". Well yes, we did, didn't we Onarchy :D
 
Lots of people on here are on disability. A broken body doesn't mean a broken brain. If you want to trip up his ideas and theories, go for it. But bringing up his apparent disability is going way below the belt.

Bollocks. I would normally never do such a thing, but given that he would deny that very help to others, he deserves it.
 
Bollocks. I would normally never do such a thing, but given that he would deny that very help to others, he deserves it.

People with physical disabilities often have no other forum to take part in, besides the forum of ideas. To bring up his disability as some sort of debating tactic is inappropriate.
 
Have you really missed the point or are you just trolling? It's not his disability people are having a go at, it's his hypocrisy.
 
JC3, Ayn Rand was also against the idea tat government should provide healthcare services to people, but this did not stop her making use of government healthcare to treat her cancer. Without government healthcare she would not have been able to afford cancer treatment on the pay of a novelist at the time. POinting this bit of hypocracy out is not to take the piss out of cancer sufferers, it's not even schadenfreude that Rand suffered cancer.

Same thing onany, he enjoys the state assistance of Norwegian social democracy at the same time slagging the system off as fascist. Shameless hypocracy.
 
JC3, Ayn Rand was also against the idea tat government should provide healthcare services to people, but this did not stop her making use of government healthcare to treat her cancer. Without government healthcare she would not have been able to afford cancer treatment on the pay of a novelist at the time. POinting this bit of hypocracy out is not to take the piss out of cancer sufferers, it's not even schadenfreude that Rand suffered cancer.

Same thing onany, he enjoys the state assistance of Norwegian social democracy at the same time slagging the system off as fascist. Shameless hypocracy.

But he's not a welfare cheat: he's disabled. He can't live any other way. He has no choice.

That doesn't mean he has to like it.
 
In a book I'm reading, it says that Russian POWS were starved by the Germans to the point where they turned to cannibalism.

If after the war, they said that cannibalism was wrong, would you call them hypocrites as well?
 
Back
Top Bottom