Aron Bastani is a weapons grade narcissist. He's a capitalist, his currency is likes, retweets, shares and views... All adds up to one thing.... £££
Aron Bastani is a weapons grade narcissist. He's a capitalist, his currency is likes, retweets, shares and views... All adds up to one thing.... £££
These are not even particulary sharp critiques. FALC isn't shit because it's impractical, FALC is shit because it's techno-utopian. [...]
Aaron Bastani's second-rate hipster-Stalinist techno-utopianism has me sold too!
I had a brief skim read of it, but must've skimmed hard as I missed all the asteroid mining lol.
My impression was it's not really a manifesto, it's a beginner's guide to a material view of history and the possibilities of a techno utopia, and it seemed okay on that score in terms of floating the possibility.
Sounds as if there's a lot wrong in the detail that fills the book out... That critical review posted up thread didn't seem vindictive.
I think a really good short contribution to this subject is Four Futures
Verso
... Which recognises that automated communism is an option, but places it as one of four outcomes within a matrix of political power. That power matrix is what should be at the front of our minds, not how are we going to pull asteroids into our orbit
Four Futures summarised by the author here
Four Futures
It quotes Bastani in that piece. It's just taken until 2019 for him to do a bookFully automated luxury communism
A 2015 Guardian article. Do that Novara Media lot ever come up with anything original. Fucking Careerists.
Haven’t got onto the political economy part (which I’m presuming covers ‘how do we get there’), but Gareth Dale rips the science apart in his the Ecologist review
Climate, communism and the Age of Affluence?
Where. Seems the author of that has never opened an IPCC or IEA report from the opening couple of hyperbolic paragraphs.Aaron Bastani’s overriding concern is climate breakdown. Anything over a 2°C rise “could be cataclysmic, creating a cascade of feedbacks” that would accelerate global heating and the sixth mass extinction. The glaciers that provide drinking water for billions are evaporating, nine-tenths of the largest fish in the oceans have disappeared, and soils are suffering from industrial farming and salination.
Although “humanity’s rise” was built on agriculture and on our “unique ability to reprogram the gifts of nature,” the planet’s natural limits are now being trampled with such violence that the prospect of human extinction begins to appear plausible. Our present course is worse than inaction. It is “rushing full speed to oblivion". We have a window of ten or twenty years.
Methane emissions would fall but CO2 emissions could even rise.
What is controversial here? Is this an article from 1995?The fulcrum of the renewables revolution will be our four-wheeled friends. “Cars won’t just be data processors on wheels, they’ll be giant portable batteries.”
We have been exponentially ramping up solar and wind for a couple of decades now. And where is there any threat to copper (for gods sakes what moron wrote this), zinc or nickel supplies.With the exponential ramping up of wind turbines, solar panels, electric vehicles and batteries, Bastani recognises that the supply of such minerals as nickel, zinc, copper, lithium, platinum and rare earth metals —will ”quickly become strained".
Universal suffrage democracy had never worked, until it was tried properly.Communism (and extreme socialism) has never worked
Bungee socialism? Socialism on a snowboard?Extreme socialism
Oh, the "communism's never been tried properly" argument. Or is it "we've never seen proper communism".Universal suffrage democracy had never worked, until it was tried properly.
The highest growth rates the western democracies achieved was in the social democratic post war era. We have not begun to explore what could be achieve with more collaborative models of organisation when the people at the top are not Stalinist fuckwits.
We have a lot of history in front of us.
Oh, the "communism's never been tried properly" argument. Or is it "we've never seen proper communism".
Here's an idea. Even though we live in a capitalist society, start a communist society anyway. Start a co-operative. Start lots of co-operatives. I'm sure that when the rest of us see how superbly they work, the whole nation will be swamped with co-ops, all offering goods and services so superior to the capitalist variety that capitalism will soon be put out of business
Rearrange the following words to form a well-known phrase or sentence:You don't know what communism is, do you?
A clue:
"co-ops, all offering goods and services so superior to the capitalist variety"
Is not it.