If someone posts something objectionable in public (e.g. Twitter), then how is it an "attack" for another member of the public to bring attention to it again later?
I don't think RLB said anything anti-Semitic in that instance, but if your boss is itching to get rid of you for the sake of PR, then you're fucked no matter what you say or don't say. Not sure what Alastair Stewart was thinking when addressing a black guy with that Shakespeare "ape" quote. Was he thinking?
I don't think RLB said anything anti-Semitic in that instance, but if your boss is itching to get rid of you for the sake of PR, then you're fucked no matter what you say or don't say. Not sure what Alastair Stewart was thinking when addressing a black guy with that Shakespeare "ape" quote. Was he thinking?
So the means are of no relevance then, any manner of underhand, opportunistic behaviour is fine, it's just the result that matters.
Clearly not something that is liable to turn round and bite you back...
Here's a tip. Next time you find a story about nothing on a loon site, take the time find the Guardian version, post that, then sit back and wait for everyone to tell you how brilliant you are.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.