Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The 'Naked Rambler' jailed for 22 months, following arrest within 60 seconds of his release!

I just looked that up. There's actually a word for it now!

Yeah, I also had to look it up. Interesting that brogdale apparently knew the word already...

I was attempting to allude to the fact that potential riders of the said "Boris Bikes" might perhaps be put off as a result of not knowing quite what they were sitting on.
 
He's obviously going to keep doing this. I do wonder whether there is any real benefit to society or public finances by keeping him in jail for most of the rest of his life.

Couldn't he be exiled to California? He would be fine in Venice or some such place.
 
I don't think that works unless they want him there. Could swap him for the Unabomber, I s'pose.

Yes, I was imagining a black bag operation where he's bundled into a van, sedated, whisked to a military airfield and dropped off on the beach by frogmen.
 
if it becomes clear that a man will simply not wear his clothes despite all pressure brought to bear on him both legal or social then surely its time to just allow him. He's not stroking an engorged member next to a playground. He just wants to be naked- IN SCOTLAND. Let the elements deal with him, for legal procedures just seem too much. Ball Riot
 
if it becomes clear that a man will simply not wear his clothes despite all pressure brought to bear on him both legal or social then surely its time to just allow him. He's not stroking an engorged member next to a playground. He just wants to be naked- IN SCOTLAND. Let the elements deal with him, for legal procedures just seem too much. Ball Riot

He has been back in england since october 2012.
 
I suppose we / he should be thankful that plod aren't restraining him and force-dressing him. Dunno... They force-feed people, why not force-dress someone?

It's all a bit weird tbh. He's harming no one, but he can't expect to walk around swinging his bellend and clackers without upsetting some hard-working families.

I feel sorry for him, but then he's just being a dick.
 
if it becomes clear that a man will simply not wear his clothes despite all pressure brought to bear on him both legal or social then surely its time to just allow him. He's not stroking an engorged member next to a playground. He just wants to be naked- IN SCOTLAND. Let the elements deal with him...

:D

Thing is, the State will never back down without overwhelming force from the other side. What he needs is a nuke.
 
What he needs is to adopt an IRA style strategy of disrupting major financial centres, only he'll have to do it using only his unclothed body which while annoying does not have the clout of plastic explosives.
 
What he needs is to adopt an IRA style strategy of disrupting major financial centres, only he'll have to do it using only his unclothed body which while annoying does not have the clout of plastic explosives.

That is more or less what he was doing when I first heard of the guy, years back - Pitching-up naked at demos in London's financial district and sometimes demoing naked on his own IIRC the very first time I noticed him, he was chained up a lamp post, naked. The Police made a big thing of covering his bits before cutting the chain and hauling him down!
 
That is more or less what he was doing when I first heard of the guy, years back - Pitching-up naked at demos in London's financial district and sometimes demoing naked on his own.

How did that work?

"What do I want? NO CLOTHES? When do I want them? Oh, I'm not wearing any..."
 
How did that work?

"What do I want? NO CLOTHES? When do I want them? Oh, I'm not wearing any..."

I think it was more of holding a "feeedom to go naked" placard and speeching once he stripped-off. Back then, he would arrive clothed and unobtrusive, then quickly strip and climb-up somewhere prominent to get his message out.
 
there are much better and sounder principles to be going to jail for . This is completely irrational extreme individualism, utterly selfish .
 
There must be rules he'd be breaking, presumably earning punishment?

Maybe they'd handcuff him and put a sock on his wanger before an appearance before the Governor

I think that was why he was denied the usual early release for non-violent prisoners in Scotland and they just left it at that. The management at Perth seemed unwilling to get into a battle of wills with him - The result could only be an incessant round of extra punishment sentencing that would only prolong/complicate matters. They just wanted shot of him.

I would not want to be that sock-wielding officer! :eek: :D
 
this geezers meat and veg must be some really unholy terror of a sight to justify all these nickings.


He must have the worlds most offensive penis. The only other reason would be that hard and inflexible (stop it) authorities just can't handle the balls
 
We seem to be a society devoid of humour. my guess is that many of those responsible for punishing this man for his 'crimes' are small minded repressed and nasty god botherers who see their role as being one of protecting the public from the sin of observing the naked human form - at the same time as spending hours wanking over the naked human forms that they invite onto their laptops.

Personally i would lack the courage to be seen naked in public, so i sneakily admire this man's hilarious and strange stance against authority.

Maybe someone should suggest a compromise, ie, that he gets his lower body covered in fashionable tattoos (which seems to have the effect of creating the illusion of someone fully clothed even if they are not) as a way of avoiding endless and ridiculous prison sentences.
 
Back
Top Bottom