He wont go.
Why, different people have it at different severity?BBC saying that he has to go and this matter is a test of Johnson’s leadership.
And as agricola rightly says, if that freak did have the virus he wouldn’t have been physically able to drive to Durham.
Why, different people have it at different severity?
I had to look that up its borderline crap genius.
And they emerged from quarantine into the London lockdown apparently.including him who was (according to his wife) confined to his bed for ten days
Nope, It should have been trending for the last 12 hours because tweets make trends.It's because Twitter won't let words like 'cumming' trend. Or 'titwank'.
And they emerged from quarantine into the London lockdown apparently.
Missed all this last night; how did 'we' find out about this...did one of his parents inconveniently die?
Post-coffee now read the Guardian piece...liked this wording:A public spirited neighbour alerted the authorities, then somehow it got to the journalists (though they've apparently been asking where he spent the lockdown for a while).
A member of the public is understood to have seen him and made a complaint to the police.
You think the simple and obvious explanation to this - that 'cumming' is a word Twitter have in their trending words blacklist because it crops up a lot in porn and such like - should be discounted out of hand for an outlandish theory that the government is paying Twitter to suppress a story which is being blanket covered in the media and widely shared on all platforms? It seems a pretty puny attempt at suppression tbh. Not really worth the bother. It's only weirdos like you who pay attention to what's trending on twitter anyway.Nope, It should have been trending for the last 12 hours because tweets make trends.
#dominiccummings - Twitter Search
9h ago @omid9 tweeted: "Literally everything around the story is.." - read what others are saying and join the conversation.twitter.com
But...he's not.
You think the simple and obvious explanation to this - that 'cumming' is a word Twitter have in their trending words blacklist because it crops up a lot in porn and such like - should be discounted out of hand for an outlandish theory that the government is paying Twitter to suppress a story which is being blanket covered in the media and widely shared on all platforms? It seems a pretty puny attempt at suppression tbh. Not really worth the bother. It's only weirdos like you who pay attention to what's trending on twitter anyway.
Because it would be a lot of effort for almost zero effect.I agree it would be a puny attempt at supression, though I am not sure why it is outlandish to think he'd try to do it
Dont be ridiculousIt is totally out to lunch to take the virus from London & spread it. Could he have some responsabilty for this?
Because it would be a lot of effort for almost zero effect.
Dont be ridiculous
but as you can see from the graph, it was already there and exponentially growing by the time Cummings arrived.that is how the virus got up there though - if not solely by him or his family, then by other people who had it going there and infecting others
but as you can see from the graph, it was already there and exponentially growing by the time Cummings arrived.
Or local residents travelling away from their locale, becoming infected and returning (asymptomatically) to spread the virus etc. Given that French researchers believe that there's been community transmission from early/mid November 2019, it's not unrealistic to believe that the same may be the case here. In which case, much as Cummings is a loathsome influence on our body politic, it's a bit of a stretch to blame a regional epidemic on his single transgression.that is how the virus got up there though - if not solely by him or his family, then by other people who had it going there and infecting others
It doesnt, but it does preclude his responsibility for an epidemic peak a week after his arrival.it was, how does that preclude the possibility he / his family infected people whilst up there?
This is absolutely the case, and inserting wild conspiracies into the story just obscures it.It's enough, surely, that he breached the government's own rules?
Those who presume to shape the law/guidance for the rest of us can expect to be held to the standards they demand of others.
IMO, it's that simple.
Well, even that usually isn't enough to do for one of them, but when you've got cabinet literally telling the country to do this every day of the week as a life and death issue I think the stakes get sufficiently highIt's enough, surely, that he breached the government's own rules?
Those who presume to shape the law/guidance for the rest of us can expect to be held to the standards they demand of others.
IMO, it's that simple.