Yep, 'moralising' judgemental types will always be there but, as killer b has said, the video and it's clear messaging was not really targeted at arseholes like that. And...speaking personally, I was annoyed that treelover was derailing a discussion about a (for once) useful message on the basis of the most trivial 'criticism' from online wankers.To be fair to treelover in particular, anecdotally being from a poor background as well as being working class (still am!), the moralising scrutiny, even from those in the working class, on the spending of money by poor people (especially unemployed) no matter the context or particular circumstance, is a 'thing,' and way before the existence and popular use of various online social media platforms. Those pressures were real for me alright.
Spent more than that as a foolish youth on shirts etc getting for thirty years ago and so did my workmates.
Right wing troll cunts can be working class tooThe only people whining & moaning about this are dickheads who don't know anything about the working class.
I've known plenty of working class people who come out with that kind of bollocks, but it's always been restricted to the unemployed.I don't think killer b understands the working class, or rather the experience of the most struggling strata within it, if he thinks the stuff mentioned is just clueless wankers being irrelevant online. These wankers were at my school, in my neighborhood, my friends' parents houses in the nicer parts of town and at work when I left school. No mobile phones or twatter accounts. It definitely marks you. You internalise shit, those doing the moralising also internalise the shit from above. I don't believe he's ever felt the shame of poverty.
How do you respond to that scrutiny though? By challenging it, or by wearing sackcloths while out in public?
Exactly...ffs why do people keep pretending that WC can't be sneering, right wing, judgemental, aspirational idiots? Who did Maggie sell off all those council houses to again?Right wing troll cunts can be working class too
I've known plenty of working class people who come out with that kind of bollocks, but it's always been restricted to the unemployed.
is this really necessary btw? do you need to see my collection of debt collection letters before I can have an opinion on this stuff?I don't believe he's ever felt the shame of poverty.
I think there needs to be an element of both, and also an awareness of the whole balance of messages you're trying to send. If by challenging a right-wing narrative you end up feeding another one, you'll end up chasing your tail.
is this really necessary btw? do you need to see my collection of debt collection letters before I can have an opinion on this stuff?
I asked treelover what he was suggesting by choosing to highlight all the irrelevant, wanky clothing based sneering that he claimed to have seen and he choose not to respond.I don't think that was what treelover was suggesting. He's been unfairly piled on imo. Unfortunately the working class, poor, doing okay or doing very nicely thank you, is not ideologically sound.
Right, and if the guy had made a video talking about his experience as someone dependent on benefits, there might be some truth to treelover's concerns. But it isn't - IME, yours may vary - a line that's likely to have much purchase as an attack against the working class in general, except among people for whom working class means benefit dependent.Trivial and irrelevant wasn't the experience of my benefit-dependant single parent family, so ...
Equating the working class with being poor, on benefits, or lying awake at night worrying about paying bills is wrong, but more importantly is politically dangerous, as it then paints everyone not doing those things as not the working class, something that capital is also very keen to do.
Equating the working class with being poor, on benefits, or lying awake at night worrying about paying bills is wrong, but more importantly is politically dangerous, as it then paints everyone not doing those things as not the working class, something that capital is also very keen to do.
Equating the working class with being poor, on benefits, or lying awake at night worrying about paying bills is wrong, but more importantly is politically dangerous, as it then paints everyone not doing those things as not the working class, something that capital is also very keen to do.
Equating the working class with being poor, on benefits, or lying awake at night worrying about paying bills is wrong, but more importantly is politically dangerous, as it then paints everyone not doing those things as not the working class, something that capital is also very keen to do.
The clip was about political parties claiming to address "white working class concerns" and who to blame for the issues causing them. As a white working class lad, he was articulating some of his concerns about the lived experience of late capitalism, and who he thought we should blame. The message was clearly not aimed at people who's capacity for solidarity is negated by their comfortable life.Equating the working class with being poor, on benefits, or lying awake at night worrying about paying bills is wrong, but more importantly is politically dangerous, as it then paints everyone not doing those things as not the working class, something that capital is also very keen to do.
Is this about something that's been said on this thread?Well that's where the sneery, shaming comes in ime... 'you aren't w/c if you haven't got a job' etc..