i'd have probably leaked it WITH consequences, to be honest
That's what I was thinking, just sent the NHS an email about an emergency medical technician listed on there as an activist cos that it just all wrong
i'd have probably leaked it WITH consequences, to be honest
But BNP leader Nick Griffin said it was a "totalitarian" move aimed at excluding Labour's political opponents.
you should be fuckikng ashamed of yourself for mis-using that line that way."First they came for the vile, moronic, racist neo-fash and I said nothing ...."
First they came for the fascists...
I keep trying to articulate my ideas on this, but I can't get past the thought that some people are willing to treat every BNP member as if they were a member of the Gestapo, and then apply the same to those BNP members' families.
It's interesting that the society I live in is unlikely to accept such overt racism, to the extent that we can all agree about how damaging this published list will be to the people on it. That's a good sign.
But a bad sign is that there's fairly widespread agreement that, for a few of these of these BNP members at least, the repercussions will be physical. Even some of those who think the names should have been published agree on this - 'those BNP bastards deserve it.'
And so do their families, apparently. Unless anyone somehow thinks that, if somone's outed as a member of the BNP, their kids are going to be miraculously unaffected by it.
The way that some people either disregard this or possibly just don't give a shit, is a very, very bad sign.
your assumptions are way off, and your questions do not deserve the same answers, so it is impossible to vote in your poll.
I for one have no 'glee', tho I do have an interest (they're not the same thing you know), and it does amuse me to know the BNP are incompetent fools.
Anyone leaking such a list must know they may have to face the 'consequences' - whether they be legal ones or not - and doing so thinking there would be no consequences would be an act of total stupidity.
Does everyone deserve whatever may come there way? Utterly meaningless nonsense of a sentence. Not worth commenting further upon.
I might well have leaked it, but if I did, I wouldn't have put in on the bleedin' internet.
Most of this discussion seems to revolve around rights. I'm not interested in nonsense like rights. The discussion should focus on whether this is effective or not - and i don't think the answer is a simple yes or no. There will be a number of clashing effects - some of the softer elements, the non-ideological may well leave, and these are exactly the sort of people Griffin needs to keep onboard if their normalisation is to continue. The hardcore will have probably have their own commitment strengthened, but that was never really in doubt. In terms of public opinion it will make them look inept and in the same mould as the other parties, when they're really pushing their difference from them, but the reaction from the other side is likely to make them look just as unappealing.
I don't think it's possible to judge how effective this is yet, Griffin could balls it up or he could make something of it, likewise the other side. But one things crystal clear, and was before this happened - that any deus ex machina from on high like this is not going to stop them, it's not going to deal with the roots of the problem or the social conditions that produced the modern BNP.
I'm not convinced the 'softer elements' will leave. Why should they? Nothing is likely happen to them. No one crippled the outed ballerina did they? Once the dust settles it may in fact embolden others to sign up. In any event as you point out, none of this deals with the BNP at a 'political' level which is where the real problem lies.
Most of this discussion seems to revolve around rights. I'm not interested in nonsense like rights. The discussion should focus on whether this is effective or not
I've decided. No, I wouldn't have done it. Not so much out of consideration for the members, as for their families. No way should the kids of these people get even more punishment for having arseholes as parents. I'm pretty much 100% certain that will happen; rumours will spread, other kids at school will find out, and the kids will suffer.
Most of this discussion seems to revolve around rights. I'm not interested in nonsense like rights. The discussion should focus on whether this is effective or not - and i don't think the answer is a simple yes or no. There will be a number of clashing effects - some of the softer elements, the non-ideological may well leave, and these are exactly the sort of people Griffin needs to keep onboard if their normalisation is to continue. The hardcore will have probably have their own commitment strengthened, but that was never really in doubt. In terms of public opinion it will make them look inept and in the same mould as the other parties, when they're really pushing their difference from them, but the reaction from the other side is likely to make them look just as unappealing.
I don't think it's possible to judge how effective this is yet, Griffin could balls it up or he could make something of it, likewise the other side. But one things crystal clear, and was before this happened - that any deus ex machina from on high like this is not going to stop them, it's not going to deal with the roots of the problem or the social conditions that produced the modern BNP.
the wider reaction to the list will be instructive for organising a response to the BNP in the longer term.
Yes, but then I'm of the opinion that political party members rolls should be publicly available documents anyway - if you're committed enough to join a party that might seek power, I should be able to see that.
Most of this discussion seems to revolve around rights. I'm not interested in nonsense like rights. The discussion should focus on whether this is effective or not - and i don't think the answer is a simple yes or no. There will be a number of clashing effects - some of the softer elements, the non-ideological may well leave, and these are exactly the sort of people Griffin needs to keep onboard if their normalisation is to continue. The hardcore will have probably have their own commitment strengthened, but that was never really in doubt. In terms of public opinion it will make them look inept and in the same mould as the other parties, when they're really pushing their difference from them, but the reaction from the other side is likely to make them look just as unappealing.
I don't think it's possible to judge how effective this is yet, Griffin could balls it up or he could make something of it, likewise the other side. But one things crystal clear, and was before this happened - that any deus ex machina from on high like this is not going to stop them, it's not going to deal with the roots of the problem or the social conditions that produced the modern BNP.
I'm not convinced the 'softer elements' will leave. Why should they? Nothing is likely happen to them. No one crippled the outed ballerina did they? Once the dust settles it may in fact embolden others to sign up. In any event as you point out, none of this deals with the BNP at a 'political' level which is where the real problem lies.
One of the elements of the fallout will be the possible ramping up of those sacked for merely being members of the BNP. Even if their job has never been affected there could well be sackings, as with the 1936 Public Order Act-ostensibly brought in to stop Mosley et al-it could very soon be used against those on the Left/pro working class elements in 'sensitive' jobs and then wider still.
As butchers said the issue is surely whether it will have any tangible effect, I won't hold my breath.
One of the elements of the fallout will be the possible ramping up of those sacked for merely being members of the BNP. Even if their job has never been affected there could well be sackings, as with the 1936 Public Order Act-ostensibly brought in to stop Mosley et al-it could very soon be used against those on the Left/pro working class elements in 'sensitive' jobs and then wider still.
On this last point, elements of the govt and civil service top layers have benn lobbying for a UK version of the old german Berufsverbot banning members of certain parties or with certain views from employment in the public sector. I could see this idea getting a boost now.
Yes, but then I'm of the opinion that political party members rolls should be publicly available documents anyway - if you're committed enough to join a party that might seek power, I should be able to see that.
That the BNP had lots of other information on this dbase that the DPR is investigating because they shouldn't is unfortunate...still, funny to see the govt privacy campaigner types indulging in their usual 'Well, it's for a good cause so it's ok' crap...
All sensible comments. Still a copy of the list is good to have as its out there like
Imho, any non-state/non hack set up would have kept it quiet but still got it out to those who might be able to use it effectively instead of handing Griffin, and other BNP memebrs, the opportunity to reply on TV/radio etc.