Stroppyoldgit
New Member
If this was a BNP membership list I'd have no compunction about leaking it. But it isn't. It's a contact list with all sorts of people on it, including those who say they're strongly opposed to the BNP and have no idea why they're there. It includes people such as greens who've written to the BNP asking for a policy document to try to work out what their alleged "environmental" policies actually are. It includes people whose relatives have sent in their names. It probably includes a few people whose mates have sent their names to the BNP with a request for literature as a "laugh". The non-BNP members and even anti-BNP people on this list merely shows the BNP to be as dishonest in administration as they are in everything else.
Dedicated fash watchers say quite a few major BNP activists are NOT on the list.
There is a theory the list was actually leaked by Griffin's faction and was sabotaged first by deleting some names and including innocent ones. In view of the fact that Griffin's injunction proceedings against the faction expelled last year comes to a final hearing soon and it is thought Griffin will lose expensively, this makes some sense. I'm not a conspiracy theorist jumping to conclusions from partial information, so I'm not saying it's true, but it's certainly a possibility. The possibility that everyone is dancing on a string jiggled by Griffin seems not to have been considered carefully enough
This discussion has overlooked the fact that there's already a list of core BNP activists' name and addresses available to anyone who cares to check the notice of poll every time they stand in an election. That gives not only the name and address(es) of the candidate(s), but also of the people who signed the nomination paper. 10 of them, I think, and unlike the candidate(s), they must be registered as electors in the ward or constituency concerned.
If anyone assembles the names and addresses from notices of poll and adds the 300-odd people from the leaked list who're marked as "activist" they will have a much more reliable list.
Nothing much seems to have happened as a result of many hundreds of BNP names and addresses having been in the public domain already. The main value of the leaked list has been to reveal a number of people as BNP members or supporters who were never suspected (e.g. a Nottingham DJ, a nutty Essex preacher), with no denials or credible claims of innocence coming from them.
Dedicated fash watchers say quite a few major BNP activists are NOT on the list.
There is a theory the list was actually leaked by Griffin's faction and was sabotaged first by deleting some names and including innocent ones. In view of the fact that Griffin's injunction proceedings against the faction expelled last year comes to a final hearing soon and it is thought Griffin will lose expensively, this makes some sense. I'm not a conspiracy theorist jumping to conclusions from partial information, so I'm not saying it's true, but it's certainly a possibility. The possibility that everyone is dancing on a string jiggled by Griffin seems not to have been considered carefully enough
This discussion has overlooked the fact that there's already a list of core BNP activists' name and addresses available to anyone who cares to check the notice of poll every time they stand in an election. That gives not only the name and address(es) of the candidate(s), but also of the people who signed the nomination paper. 10 of them, I think, and unlike the candidate(s), they must be registered as electors in the ward or constituency concerned.
If anyone assembles the names and addresses from notices of poll and adds the 300-odd people from the leaked list who're marked as "activist" they will have a much more reliable list.
Nothing much seems to have happened as a result of many hundreds of BNP names and addresses having been in the public domain already. The main value of the leaked list has been to reveal a number of people as BNP members or supporters who were never suspected (e.g. a Nottingham DJ, a nutty Essex preacher), with no denials or credible claims of innocence coming from them.