jæd said:
Show us the evidence. Then you'll have some respect. Until then you're unwanted fruitloop consiparloon-spuds of highest order...!
Why though? Why do you find scenarios we see on repeat throughout history so hard to believe?
My points on 7/7 are,
Prior knowledge is evident in the warnings to certain individuals like Benji the slimeball. Not to mention the fact that for once david davis may be onto something, oh and michael meachers revelations on the war on terror.
Haroon Aswat was named as the supplier of the bombs, mastermind, call it what you will....yet when it was found that he was a british intelligence asset with a history of being helped to escape justice in the US and Zambia by MI6, his name disappeared from public discourse.
The point I raised about the number 30 bus is that it was the only bus rerouted after the events in the underground transpired, its CCTV was not operational even though its inspected 2-3 times a week as they get a nice juicy payment for keeping it operational (fair enough). It then transpires some random technicians spent 20 hrs on the bus before the attack. So these people who the depot had never seen before, spent 20 hrs on the bus before the attack supposedly carrying out the regular inspection of the CCTV....which then turns out not to be working on the day. Surely that should be investigated!
Just like 9/11 we have economic prior knowledge, this time in the form of short-selling of the pound in the run up to the attack.
Just like 9/11 we have a drill going on as the attack takes place. Don`t give me any "but he said it was on paper" lark...please...how does a drill work...on paper? It doesn`t, the scenario is on paper, the people in the control rooms, on the radios they aren`t on paper are they? There were 1000 employees involved. Well on paper anyway...
We have the suspicious nature of the Du Menezes shooting. The reason I`m suspicious (not sure of course) that it could tie into 7/7 is because he was an electrician, was he sent to check out the "power surge", did he see something he shouldn`t of? I know this particular point is based on conjecture but "the mark of an educated mind is to entertain an idea without accepting it", don`t be afraid of conjecture!
The witness accounts saying the explosions came from below the floor. One witness explicitly said there was no guy with a rucksack in the carriage he was sitting, the explosion came from beneath the floor, there was no one sitting there. Other witnesses on two of the three trains say the same thing. That makes me think.
Its also the question of who stands to gain from these attacks? Its only Blair and the police state smarm he`s somehow conjured.