Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The 7/7 Report

jæd said:
I think your sanity is questioned because you seem unable to grasp the simple idea of four poeple blowing themselves up, killing over 50 others and wounding hundred more.

This why everyone thinks you are prize fuckwit and should stop posting here. You've do nothing for your campaign but make you look like prize conspiraloon spud...
I'm glad you have identified what happened as a 'simple idea' because until the evidence is produced that's what it remains, an idea. but an idea that has far reaching consequences.

I'm not sure that everyone here would agree about the fuckwit bit though.
 
Prole said:
I'm glad you have identified what happened as a 'simple idea' because until the evidence is produced that's what it remains, an idea. but an idea that has far reaching consequences.

So you're not impressed by "bits of bomber being scraped up", "big bangy noises in London", "twisted metal bits", "dead & injured people", and "shell shocked survivors" evidence...

Makes you sound pretty barking in my opinion...
 
jæd said:
Ok... How many people still posting here think Prole is of sound mind and body...? :confused:
You might also want to examine some of the inconsitencies in Danny Biddle's eye witness account:

It was well before 8am on 7 July when Danny began his journey to the office. He should never have been on the Circle Line train, but he took it because he was late. It was crowded and he found himself in the front, wedged in among the other commuters. Among them was Mohammad Siddique Khan, who had a rucksack on his back. Khan appeared calm, according to Danny. 'We looked at each other, as you do. He put his hand inside the rucksack. Then he looked away and he pulled back his hand.'
The official report says:
Khan ... was probably aslo seated with the bomb next to him on the floor..
 
jæd said:
So you're not impressed by "bits of bomber being scraped up", "big bangy noises in London", "twisted metal bits", "dead & injured people", and "shell shocked survivors" evidence...

Makes you sound pretty barking in my opinion...
Until evidence is in the public domain which stands up to rigrous investigation we can't really know who was responsible for this carnage.
 
fela fan said:
I agree fully with this. But i'd like to know blair's reasons for getting involved in this illegal war. Obviously the answer has something to do with the US.

What i'm saying is that blair is responsible, but what influenced his actions?

As for the comparison, i'd not like to take you on on this bernie, i'll be getting out of my depth somewhat. Although i don't see how the two contexts can be considered the same. No two are, are they?
The situation doesn't have to be 100% identical for there to be valid points of comparison. For example, the fact that most of the senior security service people are going to be ex-Northern Ireland tells you something about their likely methods and probable unpleasant side effects on our society of those methods. It also tells you that if they couldn't stop the IRA when they often knew precisely who the IRA were, they're going to really struggle when it comes to stopping self-starting 'open-source' terrorism, whatever draconian laws are at their disposal.

I'd be interested too in knowing exactly why Blair did something so totally against the interests of the British people as getting us involved in a transparently illegal invasion of a sovereign country for no evident benefit, but with consequences that are all too apparent. In pragmatic terms though, the priority as far as I'm concerned is to see him and his co-conspirators held accountable for doing what we can all see that they did, rather than pointlessly speculating about shadowy goings on behind the scenes.
 
Prole said:
You might also want to examine some of the inconsitencies in Danny Biddle's eye witness account:


The official report says:
Khan ... was probably aslo seated with the bomb next to him on the floor..

Right... So there was no explosion that morning, and Mr Biddle still has both his legs and his eye. Why don't you go and meet Mr Biddle and tell him this happy news...?
 
Prole said:
Until evidence is in the public domain which stands up to rigrous investigation we can't really know who was responsible for this carnage.

Jesus fucking wept...!

FUCK OFF TROLL!! CAN'T YOU GET THE POINT. NO-ONE WANTS YOU HERE...!
 
jæd said:
Jesus fucking wept...!

FUCK OFF TROLL!! CAN'T YOU GET THE POINT. NO-ONE WANTS YOU HERE...!
Ignore me then. I only politely reply to comments made that are adderssed to me/about me.
 
Prole said:
And I've certainly never travelled in a car with a substance as unstable as TATP.
So that means it can never, ever have happened anywhere else at any time in the entire history of the world, yes?

:rolleyes:

Oh, and if the bombers didn't get the train or indeed the car as you claim, what happened to them please?
 
Prole said:
So you'd contest to my grip on reality if I accepted the one image from Luton to catch a train that didn't run or arrive in time to board the underground trains? Without any further proof? That is what you would consider sane?


Evidence! you don't seem to need no steeeennking evidence. :rolleyes:


I think that are valid questions to be asked about 7/07 but the sort of questions you are asking are not the ones. The fact that you seem to be involved with dubious 'truth seeker' aka conspiraloon sites undermines your arguments.

I've said it before and I'll say it again that the only people who win from the phenomenon of conspiralunacy are the powers that be as the conspiraloons hysterical rantings about minor issues divert proper attention to guff rather than the failings of those in power.


To give an example, just how much time and keystrokes and bandwidth have we wasted by giving credence to the Proles and Jazzz's of this site and how much in seeking to lay blame on the people with real power who ignored the advice of military experts and regional specialists of the FCO who led us into the disaterious situation where we now find ourselves.

Truth seekers??, bullshit mongers and state obfusticators more like.
 
What's the betting Prole comes out with some Bermuda Triangle bollocks to deflect attention away from his shaky conspiraloon fantasies?:D
 
nino_savatte said:
What's the betting Prole comes out with some Bermuda Triangle bollocks to deflect attention away from his shaky conspiraloon fantasies?:D

Or the bombers were holograms created by GCHQ??:D
 
KeyboardJockey said:
Or even the trains were equiped with invisible exploding Papa Oscar Delta Sierra (speld phoneticlally to avoid stoking the conspiraloons even more ) :D

Aye, you know when you've got a conspiraloon on the back foot: they'll come out with any auld bollocks and chuck in the history of conspiracy theories through the ages as part of the deal.
 
nino_savatte said:
Aye, you know when you've got a conspiraloon on the back foot: they'll come out with any auld bollocks and chuck in the history of conspiracy theories through the ages as part of the deal.


In that case ws one of the bombs set off by the stray bullet from the Grassy Knoll? :D

If we keep up a wall of ridicule maybe the conspiraloons will go away or head back to Rense-land and their strategic extracts from Der Sturmer and lizards.
 
Prole said:
If indeed it were fake your'e right, they did make a bad job of it. A rush job perhaps?

Faking stuff in Photoshop is piece of piss! Why the hell would anyone fake it so badly? It makes no sense.
 
KeyboardJockey said:
In that case ws one of the bombs set off by the stray bullet from the Grassy Knoll? :D

If we keep up a wall of ridicule maybe the conspiraloons will go away or head back to Rense-land and their strategic extracts from Der Sturmer and lizards.

They get into a right strop if you tell them Rense and Jones are a pair of barking mad lunatics.:D
 
nino_savatte said:
They get into a right strop if you tell them Rense and Jones are a pair of barking mad lunatics.:D

So the 'truth seekers' get upset by The Truth that if it wasn't for the internet Rense and Jones and Viallis et all would be scabby piss soaked tramp-like people trying in vain get passing people to accept leaflets about their latest obsession.

Aplolgies to tramps for comparing them to the conspiraloon types :D
 
editor said:
So that means it can never, ever have happened anywhere else at any time in the entire history of the world, yes?

:rolleyes:

Oh, and if the bombers didn't get the train or indeed the car as you claim, what happened to them please?
I can't possibly answer that, but I can see how having a neat theory that 4 men suicide bombed London transport on 7th July doesn't require much thought or evidence.

I actually find it very frightening to imagine other scenarios, and I'm not sure that I can. I do know that fact is often stranger than fiction.
 
Prole said:
I can't possibly answer that, but I can see how having a neat theory that 4 men suicide bombed London transport on 7th July doesn't require much thought or evidence.

I actually find it very frightening to imagine other scenarios, and I'm not sure that I can. I do know that fact is often stranger than fiction.

Translation = "I have no evidence for what I believe, but I just know I'm right"
 
Prole said:
I actually find it very frightening to imagine other scenarios, and I'm not sure that I can. I do know that fact is often stranger than fiction.
And yet you still refuse to consider the role of pixies! Hypocrite! You're nothing but a pixiephile stooge, playing your little part in covering up for the real culprits.
 
KeyboardJockey said:
So the 'truth seekers' get upset by The Truth that if it wasn't for the internet Rense and Jones and Viallis et all would be scabby piss soaked tramp-like people trying in vain get passing people to accept leaflets about their latest obsession.

Aplolgies to tramps for comparing them to the conspiraloon types :D

Hammer-nail-head: conspiraloons crap on about the "truth" but when they are confronted with it they make all kinds of excuses why they cannot accept it.
 
Back
Top Bottom