SpackleFrog
Smash showy bell-bottom pants and sporty haircuts
Me too! Wonder if its the same one?I've got a female SWP member on facebook who's put literally NOTHING about this at all but quite a bit of stuff about the indian gang-rape etc
Me too! Wonder if its the same one?I've got a female SWP member on facebook who's put literally NOTHING about this at all but quite a bit of stuff about the indian gang-rape etc
Was it Richard Seymour in a kamikaze attack?
I bow to your more direct experience, but wrt disengagement from the criminal justice system, have you read the party's official, published response?No, I'm saying SPECIFICALLY that it's got nothing to do with setting up a parallel legal system or what has taken place inside the SWP. For dem cent to work the membership must know what they are discussing and voting on, and they must be able to attend conference (hard when dissenters are expelled for thinking about dissent. This issue has rumbled on for 2 years but it's only in the last few weeks that most people have found out that this was an allegation of rape as opposed to an affair that got a bit messy. THAT IS LITERALLY WHAT THE MEMBERSHIP WERE TOLD. All Dem Cent requires is wide ranging democratic discussion at branch, regional and national level, in order to arrive at decisions that members are then expected to abide by, but most swp members knew nothing of this. Whether you think Leninism by definition means that you must disengage from the criminal justice system is up for debate, but personally I would say not. Lenin famously said that revolutionaries should work within bourgeois parliaments, however corrupt, for as long as they were recognised as legitimate by the vast majority of the working class. I would apply exactly the same attitude to the bourgeois justice system, as a Leninist. Many SWP members would perhaps argue that I'm not a Leninist, as it goes, but they're just fucking wrong, so there.
Re the other expulsions: I don't think these were politically convenient, that's just the norm. If memory serves, the crimes were possession and GBH respectively. Like I say, I don't think there's any suggestion that this is the normal way that the SWP would deal with criminal allegations.
"This was an internal matter..."
"... our internal structures seek to promote women to leading roles and deal rigorously with any action by any member that is harmful or disrespectful of women."
"The case was discussed at length at a session of our conference, which voted to accept the report and overwhelmingly re-elected the Disputes Committee."
For those of you who know Vauxhall well, you'll see that the SWPs week just got even worse.
The helicopter crashWhat the fuck is that?
Ok I am starting to get tired of saying this, but the rape allegation was not made until September 2012.This issue has rumbled on for 2 years but it's only in the last few weeks that most people have found out that this was an allegation of rape as opposed to an affair that got a bit messy. THAT IS LITERALLY WHAT THE MEMBERSHIP WERE TOLD.
At its most extreme, the sycophancy appears cult-like. A number of CC members are big fans of jazz music. Under their leadership over the past few years, the party has organised a number of (mostly loss-making) jazz gigs as fundraising events. Regardless of their own musical tastes, comrades were told they were disloyal if they didn't purchase tickets. This elevates the cultural tastes of the official leadership to a point of political principle; and clearly is not in any way a healthy state of affairs.
I bow to your more direct experience, but wrt disengagement from the criminal justice system, have you read the party's official, published response?
It contains some comments that would appear to confirm that your interpretation of Leninist engagement is indeed at odds with that of the SWP:-
http://www.swp.org.uk/14/01/2013/response-attacks-swp
It's in the news and everything.
Indeed the SWP CC are truly Devils in human guise.My god, i had no idea things had got this bad:
Being forced to buy tickets to jazz festivals. *shudders*
Indeed the SWP CC are truly Devils in human guise.
Actually I quite like Jazz.
I bow to your more direct experience, but wrt disengagement from the criminal justice system, have you read the party's official, published response?
It contains some comments that would appear to confirm that your interpretation of Leninist engagement is indeed at odds with that of the SWP:-
http://www.swp.org.uk/14/01/2013/response-attacks-swp
My god, i had no idea things had got this bad:
Being forced to buy tickets to jazz festivals. *shudders*
My god, i had no idea things had got this bad:
Being forced to buy tickets to jazz festivals. *shudders*
My god, i had no idea things had got this bad:
Being forced to buy tickets to jazz festivals. *shudders*
the SWP remains, for all I've said, the best thing the British working class has at its disposal
That sort of thing (and this one: "The entire working class has an interest in what happens in the SWP") is why i'm not that optimistic this new lot calling for a cleaning out of the stables are that different in their political conceptions.This final line:
in what way is the SWP at your disposal?
Looking forward to the AMM response to this turn to compulsory jazz
Think you're reading way too much into the thing about it being an internal matter. We're told that the alleged victim didn't want to go to the police and in the absence of evidence otherwise we must assume that's true. They couldn't really force her could they?
So they're left with a choice - either do nothing, which means you potentially have a sex case as your national secretary. Or you could just kick him out without any kind of investigation. Or you can have an investigation, as they did.
This isn't instead of a court case, though some of the daft comments in the transcript make it look that way. It was an internal investigation to find out whether he had done things that make him unfit for his position/membership of the party. Think of it as being more like the kind of thing HR departments do when a manager is accused of harassment or summat but the alleged victim doesn't want to take it further.
After thinking it through I don't think they had any choice but to do some kind of investigation. It's the way it was carried out that's a problem.
If you disagree what would you suggest as an alternative course of action?
That sort of thing (and this one: "The entire working class has an interest in what happens in the SWP") is why i'm not that optimistic this new lot calling for a cleaning out of the stables are that different in their political conceptions.
Demonstrating that we are an organisation that can take on board its failures and change to remedy them, is the only way I believe we will restore our reputation in the eyes of the class
Think you're reading way too much into the thing about it being an internal matter. We're told that the alleged victim didn't want to go to the police and in the absence of evidence otherwise we must assume that's true. They couldn't really force her could they?
So they're left with a choice - either do nothing, which means you potentially have a sex case as your national secretary. Or you could just kick him out without any kind of investigation. Or you can have an investigation, as they did.
This isn't instead of a court case, though some of the daft comments in the transcript make it look that way. It was an internal investigation to find out whether he had done things that make him unfit for his position/membership of the party. Think of it as being more like the kind of thing HR departments do when a manager is accused of harassment or summat but the alleged victim doesn't want to take it further.
After thinking it through I don't think they had any choice but to do some kind of investigation. It's the way it was carried out that's a problem.
If you disagree what would you suggest as an alternative course of action?
What to people make of this, posted on Ian Bone's blog - http://ianbone.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/towards-a-new-movement-on-what-basis-do-discussions-begin/