Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SWP expulsions and squabbles

The CC self-selects: it has an agreed political perspective; when someone dies or resigns it chooses as replacements comrades who agree – or who are thought to agree – with that perspective; at no point is the chain ever broken by open political debate. And if the perspective is wrong? The problems extend to the membership of the CC. What are the requirements of a potential CC member? There are apparently two: that they should live in or around London and that – with a handful of exceptions – they are full-time employees of the party. So - the comrades who are eligible for membership of the CC are those who until their selection have been paid to carry out the decisions of the previous CC and who, because they tend to have been students beforehand, rarely have any direct experience of the class struggle. How can a leadership this narrow be capable of forming an accurate perspective?
 
There's no politics going on in those articles, it's just Lenin fetish, wrapped up in jargon and navel-gazing. Forget about fucking Lenin, or the IS tradition, and actually base your activities on what's going on with the class right now, in these circumstances. They need to get out of this straightjacket.
 
articul8 wouldn't know proper bolshevism if it whisked him away to dig the white sea canal
not sure if that's criticism or praise? In any case I don't think Syiza is adequately explained/dismissed with concepts like "left reformist", "centrist" or "sub-Leninist".

and I'm not holding up Syriza as "the model" for success - it could well be the Syriza falls apart in acrimony and recrimination.
 
..."sub-Leninist"...

hunt-for-red-october-sean-connery.jpg
 
not sure if that's criticism or praise? In any case I don't think Syiza is adequately explained/dismissed with concepts like "left reformist", "centrist" or "sub-Leninist".

and I'm not holding up Syriza as "the model" for success - it could well be the Syriza falls apart in acrimony and recrimination.
You think that it might be praise?
 
Oh god, proper leninism.

They can't realistically cede "Leninism" to the CC, that would finish them. And they have the advantage that it's trivially easy to show that the party Lenin led was much more freewheeling, open and democratic than the SWP. It's an open goal, so they'll take advantage.

The piece is pretty good within its limits.
 
not sure if that's criticism or praise? In any case I don't think Syiza is adequately explained/dismissed with concepts like "left reformist", "centrist" or "sub-Leninist".

and I'm not holding up Syriza as "the model" for success - it could well be the Syriza falls apart in acrimony and recrimination.

Don't you think we ought to consider the dangers (to working-class people in Greece) of SYRIZA standing firm and holding together?
 
"Hitler sought support from all sides. This is evident in his party’s full name—the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. “National” and “German” appealed to the right wing, the middle and upper classes.

But “Socialist” and “Worker” were designed to attract the left and the working class.

Hitler succeeded in hoovering up almost all middle class votes but he failed with the workers.

The working class made up over half of the German population, but less than a third of those who joined the NSDAP were working class."
Putting socialist and worker in the name of your party is designed to attract the working class?
I wonder what proportion of working class members are in the SWP?
 
"Hitler sought support from all sides. This is evident in his party’s full name—the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. “National” and “German” appealed to the right wing, the middle and upper classes.

But “Socialist” and “Worker” were designed to attract the left and the working class.

Hitler succeeded in hoovering up almost all middle class votes but he failed with the workers.

The working class made up over half of the German population, but less than a third of those who joined the NSDAP were working class."
Putting socialist and worker in the name of your party is designed to attract the working class?
I wonder what proportion of working class members are in the SWP?

This:

MYTH 1: Hitler hypnotised his followers
The bile and lies pumped out by the Nazi party (NSDAP) under Goebbels’ direction barely changed from its foundation in 1920. It blamed Communists, foreigners and especially Jews for the woes of the “master race”.

is just outright wrong, and either derives from ignorance (in which case why are you writing the article?) or deliberate falsehood (in which case, why are you lying?).
 
Back
Top Bottom