DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
Ho, ho, ho. Some good lines in this.
sales would increase tenfold if China did start writing sci fi for the Socialist Worker
Ho, ho, ho. Some good lines in this.
OMFG - A Swappie docudrama/musical resignation - is this black propaganda by the CC?
The CC self-selects: it has an agreed political perspective; when someone dies or resigns it chooses as replacements comrades who agree – or who are thought to agree – with that perspective; at no point is the chain ever broken by open political debate. And if the perspective is wrong? The problems extend to the membership of the CC. What are the requirements of a potential CC member? There are apparently two: that they should live in or around London and that – with a handful of exceptions – they are full-time employees of the party. So - the comrades who are eligible for membership of the CC are those who until their selection have been paid to carry out the decisions of the previous CC and who, because they tend to have been students beforehand, rarely have any direct experience of the class struggle. How can a leadership this narrow be capable of forming an accurate perspective?
Oh god, proper leninism.Ooh, an official riposte to the Prof from the opposition:
http://internationalsocialismuk.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/is-zinovievism-finished-reply-to-alex.html
Do you think Syrizia looks a little bit like proper bolshevism?Leninism hasn't been tried (apparently)
It has been tried, & convictedLeninism hasn't been tried (apparently)
articul8 wouldn't know proper bolshevism if it whisked him away to dig the white sea canalDo you think Syrizia looks a little bit like proper bolshevism?
not sure if that's criticism or praise? In any case I don't think Syiza is adequately explained/dismissed with concepts like "left reformist", "centrist" or "sub-Leninist".articul8 wouldn't know proper bolshevism if it whisked him away to dig the white sea canal
They need to get out of this straightjacket.
You think that it might be praise?not sure if that's criticism or praise? In any case I don't think Syiza is adequately explained/dismissed with concepts like "left reformist", "centrist" or "sub-Leninist".
and I'm not holding up Syriza as "the model" for success - it could well be the Syriza falls apart in acrimony and recrimination.
articul8 said:not sure if that's criticism or praise?
I'm sure it's not intended as such
You are now discussing whether you are objectively praiseworthy. Well done articul8, well done.it might - objectively - be praiseworthy.
interesting edit - secretly?What are you really (secretly) sure/not sure of?
In what way is your secrecy interesting to you?interesting edit - secretly?
Oh god, proper leninism.
Adolf Hitler and his henchmen
interesting disavowal/displacement of your own narcissismYou mean yourself. Away and fan your endlessly fascinating self down the LRC.
not sure if that's criticism or praise? In any case I don't think Syiza is adequately explained/dismissed with concepts like "left reformist", "centrist" or "sub-Leninist".
and I'm not holding up Syriza as "the model" for success - it could well be the Syriza falls apart in acrimony and recrimination.
in what sense - as a united reformist bloc? I don't see it.Don't you think we ought to consider the dangers (to working-class people in Greece) of SYRIZA standing firm and holding together?
"Hitler sought support from all sides. This is evident in his party’s full name—the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. “National” and “German” appealed to the right wing, the middle and upper classes.
But “Socialist” and “Worker” were designed to attract the left and the working class.
Hitler succeeded in hoovering up almost all middle class votes but he failed with the workers.
The working class made up over half of the German population, but less than a third of those who joined the NSDAP were working class."
Putting socialist and worker in the name of your party is designed to attract the working class?
I wonder what proportion of working class members are in the SWP?
MYTH 1: Hitler hypnotised his followers
The bile and lies pumped out by the Nazi party (NSDAP) under Goebbels’ direction barely changed from its foundation in 1920. It blamed Communists, foreigners and especially Jews for the woes of the “master race”.