ElizabethofYork
Old Crone
It's a great policy. First time I've ever said that about anything the Conservatives have done!
It's a great policy. First time I've ever said that about anything the Conservatives have done!
This is quite a Sunak driven bill from what I can tell, with a fair amount of conservative opposition. You can bet if Labour had introduced it, the Tories would have opposed on principle.
They did; a right wing government repealed it.AFAIR it was first mooted in New Zealand, but they've not gone through with it.
AFAIR it was first mooted in New Zealand, but they've not gone through with it.
To be fair, 10-year-old me was smashing open the cigarette machine that was in the street outside the paper shop, then legging it with a stash of Park Drive. The machine was removed soon after.You think young people will stop because the government says so? Remember when you were young? What would you have done? Personally the more illegal it was the more I wanted to try it/do it.
It's a great policy. First time I've ever said that about anything the Conservatives have done!
All of this is a bit of a waste of time if there is not the resource to enforce this properly. If there is a thriving blackmarket then this will just be pushed underground and the problem will get worse. In my opinion it is always better to give people the safer option of being able to obtain tobacco and nicotine based products from a safely controlled source.
I actually stopped smoking completely just after the pandemic and it was a direct result of vaping. However I do admit there is next to no helpful information out there and can quite easily see how easy it is to get more addicted to vaping through the use of nicotine salts and a lack of information/understanding. As far as I can tell nothing in these regulation changes addresses that.
I strongly support a ban on disposable vapes as they are awful from a environmental and safety point of view, but think the regulation surrounding vapes is an absolute joke. I swear governments are bordering on useless and much like drug policy it has been a complete and utter failure.
The flavour thing really gets to me as it was a big part of getting me to quit. Yes it makes it more attractive to people underage but it also makes it more appealing to those trying to quit tobacco. If children are obtaining vapes then surely it is because enforcement of the current rules is not working - will adding more help if the enforcement is not working well enough?
I must say, I'm a bit surprised to see the level of support for prohibition here on urban, and not even simple prohibition but something that only prohibits smoking to a section of the population. Yes, smoking is bad and yes there needs to be encouragement to help people to stop - and to some degree this is quite successful with the number of smokers now lower than ever. But we all know where prohibition leads to.
I must say, I'm a bit surprised to see the level of support for prohibition here on urban, and not even simple prohibition but something that only prohibits smoking to a section of the population. Yes, smoking is bad and yes there needs to be encouragement to help people to stop - and to some degree this is quite successful with the number of smokers now lower than ever. But we all know where prohibition leads to.
The underground industry is already there though and some of the fake fags are much nastier than real ones.It's not a ban on smoking though. It's a ban on the sale of tobacco to those born after 2009. I think the difference is important, as I don't honestly see some prohibition era underground industry springing up to supply the youth with black market fags. They'll just be gotten via existing means for the most part. It'll barely register IMO.
What I absolutely do agree with, and I don't honestly see any argument against it, is the banning of disposable vapes.
I’m pretty ambivalent. However, I can’t see any coherence behind current policy on cigarettes versus cocaine, heroin and other narcotics. I think either there is value in banning them all or there is no value in banning any of them. I can see valid arguments in both directions, but not the half way house we currently have.I must say, I'm a bit surprised to see the level of support for prohibition here on urban, and not even simple prohibition but something that only prohibits smoking to a section of the population. Yes, smoking is bad and yes there needs to be encouragement to help people to stop - and to some degree this is quite successful with the number of smokers now lower than ever. But we all know where prohibition leads to.
The underground industry is already there though and some of the fake fags are much nastier than real ones.
Can someone explain why New Zealand dropped this policy? Which actually seems very smart?
Ban fags and legalise everything else would be my chosen policy. At least heroin and cocaine have positives.I’m pretty ambivalent. However, I can’t see any coherence behind current policy on cigarettes versus cocaine, heroin and other narcotics. I think either there is value in banning them all or there is no value in banning any of them. I can see valid arguments in both directions, but not the half way house we currently have.
I think my approach to this is that it's wrong / counterproductive to ban drugs outright, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't ban, heavily restrict or discourage particularly problematic forms/delivery methods. So no to a ban on nicotine but perhaps a ban on tobacco is justified - or a price hike so extreme it amounts to much the same thing.
Was it so bad when mephedrone was legal? Surely the main issue was it being a new drug with little in the way of harm reduction advice etc? I think there would be models of legal mephedrone availability that would probably work.It's a complex one isn't it? When I was younger I thought legalising everything was the only way really. The came mephedrone and I'm not really sure anymore.
I’m pretty ambivalent. However, I can’t see any coherence behind current policy on cigarettes versus cocaine, heroin and other narcotics. I think either there is value in banning them all or there is no value in banning any of them. I can see valid arguments in both directions, but not the half way house we currently have.
Yes, but the industry is there so it's easy for them to go from selling them under the counter to avoid the high prices to selling them under the counter because they are banned.That's symptomatic of the price of fags though. I don't think the impending legislation will have much impact here WRT young people. Young smokers are already in terminal decline. It's all about vaping now.
Was it so bad when mephedrone was legal? Surely the main issue was it being a new drug with little in the way of harm reduction advice etc? I think there would be models of legal mephedrone availability that would probably work.
Was it so bad when mephedrone was legal? Surely the main issue was it being a new drug with little in the way of harm reduction advice etc? I think there would be models of legal mephedrone availability that would probably work.