Something that would have been great for any interlocutor of hers to throw back in her face. Would love to see her reaction as I bet she has never been confronted with the truth of that beforeGood for them, and she can fuck off with her fake pretending to care about Jews. You believe cultural Marxism is a thing, Suella, you twat.
Thing is she'll love that as she can play the "we need to 'reform' the courts/quit the ECHR line"Cruella takes another L
The High Court has ruled that the former Home Secretary Suella Braverman acted unlawfully when she made regulations last year that restricted the right to public protest. The judgment follows a judicial review brought by Liberty in which Public Law Project acted as an intervenor.
High Court: Victory for the Rule of Law - Public Law Project
The High Court has ruled that former Home Secretary Suella Braverman acted unlawfully when she made regulations restricting protest rightspubliclawproject.org.uk
She'll be polishing her golden victim card as we speak.Thing is she'll love that as she can play the "we need to 'reform' the courts/quit the ECHR line"
the court result doesn't matter as the walney report released today - Independent review: Political violence and disruption. and whether it's the current government or the next government that gets to grips with its recommendations, one thing's for sure, things are going to get worseShe'll be polishing her golden victim card as we speak.
Thing is she'll love that as she can play the "we need to 'reform' the courts/quit the ECHR line"
Neither can this:
Suella Braverman claims to have contributed to a legal textbook. The author says she didn’t.
"The book’s author says Braverman made “no written or editorial contribution”, and simply did some photocopying."
You hear this a lot from critics from the backbenches, that from Cameron onwards they've not truly been conservative, that they're too green, too soft, too fond of high taxes, too intolerant of Brexit. What's the saying about there are none too blind as those who cannot see?Move BACK to the right? Aren't they already there? Why doesn't she just join Reform?
There is "the right", there is Patel's right then there is her right.Move BACK to the right? Aren't they already there? Why doesn't she just join Reform?
Whilst conceding defeat, Cruella explains what has caused this debacle, and how reverse the fortunes of the Tory party going forward
View attachment 431653
‘Move back to the Right’
Buddhism spans a pretty broad spectrum - from the chanting and meditating eschew-worldly-goods sort all the way to OUR RELIGION OF PEACE MUST DESTROY ALL OTHER FAITHS BY FORCE IF NECESSARY.I struggle to understand how she can possibly be some sort of BUDDHIST FFS...
Cut from the same cloth as the Buddhist Nationalists who were perpetrators in the Rohingya genocideI struggle to understand how she can possibly be some sort of BUDDHIST FFS...
Because Buddhists are just as full of shit as any other religion?I struggle to understand how she can possibly be some sort of BUDDHIST FFS...
So were a lot of Japanese imperialists, and the Burmese junta for that matter. Think she might be Nichiren too, which has had a chequered history.I struggle to understand how she can possibly be some sort of BUDDHIST FFS...
Yin and Yang isn't it. But day a nasty person but by night a Buddhist, well in her dreams.I struggle to understand how she can possibly be some sort of BUDDHIST FFS...
She knows she would be unlikely to be elected as a Reform candidate. If Reform does relatively well tomorrow she might consider it.Move BACK to the right? Aren't they already there? Why doesn't she just join Reform?
No - too psychopathic - as if they'd learned nothing from the tradition - even dodges the universal Golden Rule...Why, too brown?