Scorcher annual 1981 - an excellent vintage, with an Ian Kennedy painted cover
Third appearance for Ian Bone, giving Jones a run for his money
I see all your magazines are in date orderAll too clean and neat you fucking show-off's.
This is in my study/den/bolt-hole. I made a slot on the top of the Cheesy Football thing as a moneybox for £2 coins, probably got 8 quid in there.
you're let down by eden lost in music which is the wrong way upBlu-ray shelfies:
It's a German Blu-ray and they print the spine the other way round.you're let down by eden lost in music which is the wrong way up
Yes. But it's still the wrong way round compared to all the others.It's a German Blu-ray and they print the spine the other way round.
Do you ever do anything else apart from hanging around on here with a pathological need to be right ?Yes. But it's still the wrong way round compared to all the others.
i don't have a pathological need to be right. i am right. it is as simple as that.Do you ever do anything else apart from hanging around on here with a pathological need to be right ?
yes. but i imagine the spines are all the same way round, at least the ones which are vertical.I daren't post a pic of my shelves in London then. They're all over the place. No order at all.
nahyes. but i imagine the spines are all the same way round, at least the ones which are vertical.
your librarianship credentials hang in tatters
i've discussed this with other 'libbys' and many of them are chaotic with their own books too, strangelyyour librarianship credentials hang in tatters
i don't have a pathological need to be right. i am right. it is as simple as that.
if you look at the way anyone else shelves things, you'll see that those annoying french or german books which have the spine printed the other way up are shelved upside down to fit in with the other books. it isn't that the german blu-ray is right or the british ones are right. it is that things should go the way the dominant number do, for both neatness and ease of use.
yes. no one's going to have all their books in a perfect bliss or dewey sequence. but they are generally - and i say this from looking at more people's bookshelves than i care to remember - a) with spines facing outwards, and b) those books not horizontal have their spines as in e.g. post 123, that is you turn your head to the right to read them.i've discussed this with other 'libbys' and many of them are chaotic with their own books too, strangely
we're not talking about dvds.But then all the logos etc at the bottom of the DVD would be upside down, which would also look wrong.
we're not talking about dvds.
try putting a blu-ray in a dvd player and the difference will rapidly become apparent.In the context of Reno's shelves you are. Well, blu-rays.
i just throw mine in the general direction of my book case. there's loads on the floor as well. i'm going to have to transport them from London to Leeds some time next week. that'll be fun.yes. no one's going to have all their books in a perfect bliss or dewey sequence. but they are generally - and i say this from looking at more people's bookshelves than i care to remember - a) with spines facing outwards, and b) those books not horizontal have their spines as in e.g. post 123, that is you turn your head to the right to read them.
good lucki just throw mine in the general direction of my book case. there's loads on the floor as well. i'm going to have to transport them from London to Leeds some time next week. that'll be fun.
try putting a blu-ray in a dvd player and the difference will rapidly become apparent.
Have a pedant pointClearly I am aware of that. The fact remains that your point about orientation is wrong. It wouldn't fit in with the other <objects>, it would simply align the spine text. The <object> itself and any other details on the spine would be upside down and would not fit in with the other <objects>.