Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
Good man.Lord Carlile has blamed cycle lanes for the attack:
Peer blames Westminster Bridge cycle lane for terrorist attack
But
Good man.Lord Carlile has blamed cycle lanes for the attack:
Peer blames Westminster Bridge cycle lane for terrorist attack
it's wide enoughThe pavement there is nowhere near wide enough though, which is the point being made.
yeh as we've just been discussingTalking of cyclists' deaths, it seems some clown has been on the radio talking about how the segregated cycle land on the bridge made it easier for the attacker.
I think the 'perpetrator' probably was someone driven to the point of madness and fury by what the interfering West has been doing to civilizations and cultures that he feels a deep affinity with.
I don't think he will have been part of a bigger plan.
Whilst I am truly sorry for the deaths that happened yesterday in London, just for a little perspective: Today in Mosul Rudaw are reporting that at least 137 civilians have been killed as a result of airstrikes.
Among the 29 treated for injuries at hospital were 12 Britons, three French children, two Romanians, four South Koreans, one German, one Pole, one Chinese, one Italian, one Irish, one American and two Greeks.
with the frequency with which attackers are known to the 'security' services, you'd think people would begin to wonder how effective these 'security' services are.Am I imagining it, or has the international human value exchange been radically altered recently to the detriment of South Koreans and Greeks?
Westminster attacker was UK-born and known to MI5, Theresa May tells MPs
with the frequency with which attackers are known to the 'security' services, you'd think people would begin to wonder how effective these 'security' services are.
Almost seems like a tactic; alert spooks to your 'peripheral' nature, wait/sleep to see heat subside, then strike 'under the radar'?with the frequency with which attackers are known to the 'security' services, you'd think people would begin to wonder how effective these 'security' services are.
after 15.5 years you'd have thought they'd done them allThey've investigated probably half the Muslims in the UK I suspect...
Tend to agree, something along the lines of the Power of Nightmares thesis, the Adam Curtis film from just after 9/11 - don't agree with his whole thesis, fwiw, but he has a point with how events like this are used by the powerful. In staging this attack just outside Parliament it really is as if the terrorists are colluding with those in power to allow them to present themselves as our protector (in practice of course, I haven't gone all conspiraloon). That seemed to happening even last night as the journos and parliamentary correspondents rattled on about this 'symbolic attack' on the mother of parliaments. Partly that was just about who they were, parliamentary correspondents who were likely to rattle on about stuff like that and happened to be in situ when an attack happened. However, I have a feeling its going to be a major theme in the way '22/3' passes into history.I can't help but think this plays into the hands of those seeking to create a climate of fear (the jihadis, the racists, and the security services). It'd be better if those who weren't directly affected just got on with things as normal. As sad as this is for the families of those who died, in the context of London's statistics on stabbings and road deaths, the numbers are not statistically significant. (Not saying the deaths aren't significant to those who knew them, of course.)
after 15.5 years you'd have thought they'd done them all
Almost seems like a tactic; alert spooks to your 'peripheral' nature, wait/sleep to see heat subside, then strike 'under the radar'?
Depressingly, you're probably correct.In an age mass comms data, that'd be a terrible tactic.
More likely, there's so many of them with the potential to do something like this, that there's no way to keep on top of everyone - just direct resources at the highest risk, in the knowledge that some low risks will manifest occasionally.
No use of the heritage word, then?BBC reporting the attacker was 'British-born'. So that would be 'British', then.
Tend to agree, something along the lines of the Power of Nightmares thesis, the Adam Curtis film from just after 9/11 - don't agree with his whole thesis, fwiw, but he has a point with how events like this are used by the powerful. In staging this attack just outside Parliament it really is as if the terrorists are colluding with those in power to allow them to present themselves as our protector (in practice of course, I haven't gone all conspiraloon). That seemed to happening even last night as the journos and parliamentary correspondents rattled on about this 'symbolic attack' on the mother of parliaments. Partly that was just about who they were, parliamentary correspondents who were likely to rattle on about stuff like that and happened to be in situ when an attack happened. However, I have a feeling its going to be a major theme in the way '22/3' passes into history.
That mother of all parliaments had killed how many with its 'austerity' in recent months. It's a mutually beneficial distraction.
That sounds to be entirely about the security services and government building their defence about someone, cliché alert, was on their radar.
Surely that's the Icelandic Althing anywayChrist when did a Monarchy start calling itself the mother of democracy anyway?
no, british people do not do this sort of thing .'. "british-born" but something else-adultBBC reporting the attacker was 'British-born'. So that would be 'British', then.
i would have thought it was democratick athens in the auld auld times.Surely that's the Icelandic Althing anyway
BBC reporting the attacker was 'British-born'. So that would be 'British', then.
You only need those if you wish to become a citizen. Only those born British are allowed to disavow them, whatever the fuck they are.Did he have British Values? Am reliably informed you can only be a British Citizen once you obtain those.