It's apparently just Brand being Brand.I think it's fairly horrible to suggest "well women should have known and stayed away from him" - if that is what is being suggested in some posts here.
Sounds a bit along the lines of "she asked for it".
It's apparently just Brand being Brand.
it could
but he is rich and has dick heads like musk supporting him
want you life picked apart go for it
Not about Brand but I just noticed a reference to "Hari" in this thread and on Googling I was very surprised to learn that Johann Hari is still able to publish stuff that people will read with a straight face.Hands up who's surprised?
There's lots of people who don't know anything about him, I suppose.Johann Hari is still able to publish stuff that people will read with a straight face.
He copied someone who'd done it better a few years before.I thought he'd just died of being shit a decade or so ago.
Kinda what I was sayingSaw an actor on twitter who knew him say that the injunctions were a holding tactic while he developed the whole conspiracy and anti-msm stance in preparation for being called out. Now that's a conspiracy theory.
Not about Brand but I just noticed a reference to "Hari" in this thread and on Googling I was very surprised to learn that Johann Hari is still able to publish stuff that people will read with a straight face.
I thought he'd just died of being shit a decade or so ago.
You don't get the full Antonio Negri ashtray angle from that wikipedia article, though.I had heard of Hari years ago, but could not remember anything about him. This Wikipedia article is very enlightening. Apparently Brand helped him out a lot.
Johann Hari - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
You don't get the full Antonio Negri ashtray angle from that wikipedia article, though.
Antonio Negri ashtray angle??
You’re not being castigated for saying Brand may not be guilty of rape.
Everyone here knows Brand may not be guilty of rape and sexual assault (although it looks likely that he could be).
Rape is rape.
It’s not a scale from 1 to rape with “yeah well, she didn’t say no/she was drunk/... etc” somewhere between 1 and rape.
Don't go putting words in my mouth.
Rape is rape regardless of the type of rape and I have no sympathy with proven rapists.
To rephrase I said I think he less likely to be a Valery Makarenkov and more likely a Harvey Weinstein type.By Christ, this is a fucking stupid thing to say. Rapists can often appear to be 'nice' people to others.
People who like him and can't conceive that he could be guilty.Why can my #metoo female friend not see he's an obvious cunt?
I'm not leaving because you think I should.I think you should leave this thread.
I'm not leaving because you think I should.
I'm leaving because I'm disgusted by Urbanites on this thread happy to immediately assume guilt.
Based on what?
A Tory news outlet going fishing for dirt, looking to create a story where previously none existing and digging up some accusations.
I've been vilified for daring to suggest that Innocent until proven guilty is a valid stance.
By this post above you are supporting those who disagree with innocent until proven guilty.
North Korea, China, Saudi Arabia and Iran do things the way you lot want. Guilty first.
And someone had the cheek to accuse me of being right wing because I support innocent first. Jokes!
Story. Not accusations.No previous accusations? Look at the Jonathan Ross thing (as I've said previously) or consider the Times interview or woman in a wheelchair clip posted in this thread. Just that sort of stuff sets off alarm bells, more so when the new accusations are added. It's like Saville, a range of incidents & behaviours that add up.
So you've formed a rock solid opinion on something you know nothing about. Christ wept. The story / allegations / whatever you want to call it have been brewing for years, covered for by legal threats. Fern Brady, Sarah Pascoe, Jimmy Carr, especially Katherine Ryan have all very clearly alluded to it over the years, but stopped short of actual accusations for two reasons - One, it's not their SA to report and doxxing victims of a prominent predator doesn't end well. And two, the guy had his lawyers over everything.Story. Not accusations.
There wasn't a current Russell Brand story. Now there is.
TBH though I haven't had time to watch the TV programme or read the Article yet. So I don't really know if someone went to the Times or if the Times went to all of them and every woman they could find who'd ever worked with him. Or followed rumours or whatever journalistic methods are used.
When you're halfway to China quit diggingStory. Not accusations.
There wasn't a current Russell Brand story. Now there is.
TBH though I haven't had time to watch the TV programme or read the Article yet. So I don't really know if someone went to the Times or if the Times went to all of them and every woman they could find who'd ever worked with him. Or followed rumours or whatever journalistic methods are used.
The Antonio Negri connection is that the Hari plagiarism was first exposed by fans of Negri who objected to a hit job interview Hari claimed to have done with him, where they realised that he either hadn't done the interview at all or else had spiced it up with questions he'd not actually asked, cos he'd just copy-pasted things Negri had said in a different interview and pretended they were answers to his questions. And the ashtray angle is that one of the things that first tipped them off that the interview might be a bit dodgy is Hari included a bit describing how Negri lit up a fag but was then told by a waiter that you couldn't smoke inside and so put it in the ashtray, ashtrays not traditionally being provided in places where you can't smoke. If it wasn't for his habit of making up lies about Italian autonomists and their smoking habits, Hari's plagiarism might never have come to light. (There's also another side aspect about Hari's fondness for writing some rather troubling erotica that has also been largely lost to the mists of time - content warnings apply to that link.)Antonio Negri ashtray angle??