I think that's a great article personally.
What's even the issue? Anyone seriously offended by that article needs to get a fucking grip and have a think. 1.8 million Saint Tommy views and the left blowing its trumpet on twitter about The Revolution should be far more of a cause for concern.
Who/what are you responding to?
I too am new to this rule that before disagreeing with something you take it up with the author first. That’s just odd. Odd, impractical and made up.
What a weird couple of pages.
I too am new to this rule that before disagreeing with something you take it up with the author first. That’s just odd. Odd, impractical and made up.
There's some interesting reading there.Okay. Here are some academic papers on CSA that might help us all:
Ella Cockbain | University College London - Academia.edu
Haven't had time to read them yet.
Yeh, at the very least you should take things up with the author when you know you disagree with something rather than before. Doing it your way round is really impractical. But I haven't said it's a rule, rather that some things need to be taken up with people off the boards if the poster really wants a resolution. Otherwise it's just frothing. Of course Magnus McGinty could pop down the ripper museum next week where I'm sure he'll be able to chat to Lisa and any concerns he has about what she said can be dealt withWhat a weird couple of pages.
I too am new to this rule that before disagreeing with something you take it up with the author first. That’s just odd. Odd, impractical and made up.
Yeh, at the very least you should take things up with the author when you know you disagree with something rather than before. Doing it your way round is really impractical. But I haven't said it's a rule, rather that some things need to be taken up with people off the boards if the poster really wants a resolution. Otherwise it's just frothing. Of course Magnus McGinty could pop down the ripper museum next week where I'm sure he'll be able to chat to Lisa and any concerns he has about what she said can be dealt with
Yeh, it's a suggestion. It's not a rule. And there's no onus on you to do it. But if you think Lisa's wrong and you do indeed have the respect for her you say you do then it seems to me you should raise it, as you'd both gain from any ensuing discussion. There's no need to do it on the Internet, sure you could have a chat with her in person at an event you might go to anywaySo what’s the point of this place then? BTW, I’ve never before felt the need to debate authors directly, you can’t point to examples of posters suggesting it previously, other long term posters and an admin are perplexed by the suggestion so I’ve no idea why you’re ploughing on with it.
Yeh, it's a suggestion. It's not a rule. And there's no onus on you to do it. But if you think Lisa's wrong and you do indeed have the respect for her you say you do then it seems to me you should raise it, as you'd both gain from any ensuing discussion. There's no need to do it on the Internet, sure you could have a chat with her in person at an event you might go to anyway
you shouldn't be called a cunt for disagreeing with someone. No one's right all the time. Lisa can't expect to be right all the time, I can't, hell even Ian bone's wrong on occasion. And while you're welcome to humiliate yourself if you so desire, in your shoes I'd just ask her about what she wrote, what led her to that pov. It's a pity you're busy next weekend but I hope you enjoy what you have planned.But what’s the point when I’ve already been told I’m WRONG by wiser heads here and thus saving me from travelling across town to publicly embarrass myself? In fact I was told that simply disagreeing with her made me a cunt of the highest order as she’s on our side.
Besides, I’m busy next Sat.
I’ve not yet read the piece that Magnus is supposed to take up with Lisa. I may not even disagree with it. But let’s say I disagree with something else, and I know where to find the author, is there a cut off point for travel time? If it’s a 40 minute round trip, would it be OK to post my opinion on the boards before attempting the journey? What about 50 minutes? An hour?Yeh, at the very least you should take things up with the author when you know you disagree with something rather than before. Doing it your way round is really impractical. But I haven't said it's a rule, rather that some things need to be taken up with people off the boards if the poster really wants a resolution. Otherwise it's just frothing. Of course Magnus McGinty could pop down the ripper museum next week where I'm sure he'll be able to chat to Lisa and any concerns he has about what she said can be dealt with
it's up to you, but if you don't admire or respect them perhaps you shouldn't travel at all.I’ve not yet read the piece that Magnus is supposed to take up with Lisa. I may not even disagree with it. But let’s say I disagree with something else, and I know where to find the author, is there a cut off point for travel time? If it’s a 40 minute round trip, would it be OK to post my opinion on the boards before attempting the journey? What about 50 minutes? An hour?
at the time you had no queries about the text as you hadn't read it, so there was nothing to raise with the authorThe other day I posted up a report in the press about a book I hadn’t yet read. In that case I happened to know the author. I’m wondering whether actually I should have waited until I’d read the book, spoken to the author about it, and ironed out with her any queries I had about the text? Please advise.
only if you have the assent of both neel and mattickAlso, foolishly, I clicked like on a post that was discussing an interview between Paul Mattick Jr and Phil Neel. But actually I know where to find Paul Mattick’s email address. Should I go back and unlike the post?
I know there's two pages of nonsense since this post but are you really claiming that they are a different class because they raped indoors rather than outdoors? Properties just means buildings.So you can’t point to it then? Because I can’t either. I don’t know precisely how they managed to operate. But they were using properties as part of their offending. Unless they had their rape factories in the local park?
I know there's two pages of nonsense since this post but are you really claiming that they are a different class because they raped indoors rather than outdoors? Properties just means buildings.
I assumed there were property / business owners amongst their number. Alongside the fact they exploit people for profit.
Assume makes an ass out of u and me.
Won't be right back I reckon, queue to cunt him off gets pretty long weekends.BRB, just off down Toby Young’s house to explain why I think he’s a cunt.
You won't BRB, there's a queue a mile longBRB, just off down Toby Young’s house to explain why I think he’s a cunt.
I assumed there were property / business owners amongst their number. Alongside the fact they exploit people for profit.
If you feel the need to clear things with your brother first a firing squad's the least you deserveI think I actually discussed a book by my brother with someone on here without first fully clearing my arguments with my brother himself.
Firing squad please.