Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Roosh V, Pro-Rape Pick Up Artist, Announces Worldwide 'Tribal Meetings'

Without patriarchal interference.......really...really do you seriously think there is still no interference ?????? Funny that as i still hear the old attitudes quite frequently..."slut, whore......what does she expect dressed like that" etc etc etc.......i think for a lot of people these attitudes STILL have an influence


i think he's also using a fairly wide definition of arranged marriage
 
Yeah i never trust men who say they're feminists lol. I know that is unfair but imo actions speak louder than words and men who loudly proclaim their support for womens rights can be some of the worst creeps imaginable.

Ding ding! We have a winner. You are 110% correct. Show me a man who calls himself a feminist and I'll tell you--as I've told everyone on this thread--"watch what they do, not what they say." It's a good rule for life in general actually.
 
Without patriarchal interference.......really...really do you seriously think there is still no interference ?????? Funny that as i still hear the old attitudes quite frequently..."slut, whore......what does she expect dressed like that" etc etc etc.......i think for a lot of people these attitudes STILL have an influence

I think that's on the way out.

As recently as 20 years ago, being "slut-shamed" was still something to be feared, and by many women avoided at all costs. Today however many (perhaps most) women will simply laugh at any such slur. In another 20 years it will have lost its power to hurt altogether.
 
Hypergamy is women's free choice. It is what (most) women do when they can do what they like.
:mad: if anyone is still thinking that "hypergamy" as used by Dwyer & Roosh actually means anything at all, this 2 minute educational film from Men Going Their Own Way might help.
Hypergamy does not exist, it's just a cry of rage against women who hurt your feelings in some way.
Hypergamy Doesn’t Care
 
Last edited:
The online variety of MRA seems to profile younger and maybe a bit more educated though? Something about role-model confusion maybe? Unrealistic (media driven) expectations?

Expectations that were realistic for their fathers, like dating a few different women in their youth, then marrying one at around 30 years old.

That's no longer a realistic expectation for many young men (again, see Roosh and company). It's no longer realistic because, to put it bluntly, 80% of women are chasing 20% of men. And the women are doing this because they can, because that's what they want to do. This unprecedented freedom for women is literally intolerable to a certain kind of young man.
 
The Rooshes of this world (and they are legion) are mad. They are being driven mad by the following circumstance: for the first time ever in the history of the human race, women are free to choose their sexual partners on the basis of their own sexual desires, without patriarchal interference.

I think everyone can agree that this is true.

So the question becomes, how does society deal with this unprecedented development? Because it will undoubtedly have profound effects--indeed it already is.
another deployment of the dwyer phallacy
 
Is it possible that some sort of rancid cultural hegemony has actually been achieved already for these ideas in certain big chunks of gamer (and closely related) culture?

Has such hegemony been achieved in milieus that are in effect a significant element of what passes for socialisation for many young men?

Yes, and yes.

Now, hegemony doesn't just arise out of nowhere. It arises out of specific social circumstances, it is a response to objective social conditions. The cultural hegemony of this madness among weird young men is a sociopathic and hysterical response to women's unprecedented liberty to select their own sexual partners.
 
The point is it isn't just sad act basement dwellers. There are some people with real gravitas driving this nonsense.

Bullshit.

There is no-one with gravitas involved in this insanity. There couldn't be, it's sociopathy. It is the domain of the deranged. Where is this gravitas of which you speak?
 
:mad: if anyone is still thinking that "hypergamy" as used by Dwyer & Roosh actually means anything at all, this 2 minute educational film from Men Going Their Own Way might help.
Hypergamy does not exist, it's just a cry of rage against women who hurt your feelings in some way.
Hypergamy Doesn’t Care

Check the casual, automatic racism at 50 seconds. That's the connection that Bernie was alluding to, or part of it, right there.

What that video shows is men discovering what women have always known: sexual attraction knows no morality.
 
Yes, and yes.

Now, hegemony doesn't just arise out of nowhere. It arises out of specific social circumstances, it is a response to objective social conditions. The cultural hegemony of this madness among weird young men is a sociopathic and hysterical response to women's unprecedented liberty to select their own sexual partners.

Is 'women's unprecedented liberty to select their own sexual partners' the only 'objective social condition' that matters in your interpretation ... ?

... or are you just prioritising it over all the other ones that were being discussed a couple of pages back because it's more fun as wind-up material?
 
Is 'women's unprecedented liberty to select their own sexual partners' the only 'objective social condition' that matters in your interpretation ... ?

... or are you just prioritising it over all the other ones that were being discussed a couple of pages back because it's more fun as wind-up material?

Well I suppose you could argue its an epiphenomenon based on de-industrialization or somesuch.

Personally though, I think hegemonic processes are relatively autonomous--in other words they don't have to be explained by reference to anything else. And the freedom of women to select their sexual partners is a rather important development in its own right.
 
What definition of sexual attraction are you using for this to be sexually attractive?

rupertmurdoch.jpg
Ask Jerry Hall ...
 
If the road sweeper was very clever / funny or whatever possibly. Shes not someone I'd have picked as an example of your hypergamy theory.

She's the perfect example.

She could pretty much have any guy she wants. So what does she want? Does she want a ripped toyboy? No she does not. She marries "up," even though her circumstances mean that marrying "up" greatly restricts her choices. She does it anyway.

Do you think a man in her situation would have chosen a wrinkly 80 year-old woman?
 
Well I suppose you could argue its an epiphenomenon based on de-industrialization or somesuch.

Personally though, I think hegemonic processes are relatively autonomous--in other words they don't have to be explained by reference to anything else. And the freedom of women to select their sexual partners is a rather important development in its own right.

I just don't buy anything that sounds like a single cause here.

There are multiple questions in need of answers, each complex enough to demand a multi-causal explanation:

1) Why are young men looking for sexual enlightenment from other men marketing themselves as PUA gurus?
2) Why are they conceiving the whole business in terms of (quasi-magical?) techniques applied to depersonalised prey?
3) Why are they bonding online with other men around such activities and occasionally terrorising women in self-organised packs?
4) How are they constructing the 'insane' (and in some cases quite evidently dangerous) forms of anti-feminist subjectivity that you mentioned earlier?
5) Why are they formulating conspiracy theories about society outside their group and why do those theories sound so similar to those of racial supremacists?

I'm sure I'll think of some more in a minute ...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom