bimble
floofy
I prefer HotDudesWithKittens - Official (@hotdudeswithkittens) • Instagram photos and videos but you know, each to their ownThere's an entire internet phenomenon based on pictures of him with dogs.
I prefer HotDudesWithKittens - Official (@hotdudeswithkittens) • Instagram photos and videos but you know, each to their ownThere's an entire internet phenomenon based on pictures of him with dogs.
i always like seeing the dwyer phallacy being playedWell it seems that we're finally approaching a consensus here. We can all agree on the following three points:
1. Roosh and his followers and imitators are convinced that women are practicing open hypergamy.
2. They are really, really pissed off about it.
3. They are foolish and wrong to be pissed off about it.
That's a quite remarkable degree of consensus for U75. The fact that we've been able to achieve it shows that this Roosh phenomenon is as serious as it is ludicrous, iyswim.
good to see you posting againentitled little shits ain't worked out no one wants to fuck them cus they are rape advocate MRA's, pathetic idiots.
it's easy to blame women for your utter failure as a human being, it speaks volumes.
even worse are the liberal 'male feminist' (lol cus women arent allowed anything of their own are they mneerrrr inclusion - fuck off m8) encouraging the 'choice' element of sex work when most people who are in it are fucking desperate and vulnerable, just to ensure they have access to women and to have their erections serviced as if it's a human right.
empowerment is a total fucking lie, its a trick, always was.
Is there a version of Godwin's law that decrees every conversation on the internet sooner or later ends up with something to do with them Jews?It's quite interesting to search MRA / PUA sources for the use of the term 'cultural marxism'
entitled little shits ain't worked out no one wants to fuck them cus they are rape advocate MRA's, pathetic idiots.
it's easy to blame women for your utter failure as a human being, it speaks volumes.
even worse are the liberal 'male feminist' (lol cus women arent allowed anything of their own are they mneerrrr inclusion - fuck off m8) encouraging the 'choice' element of sex work when most people who are in it are fucking desperate and vulnerable, just to ensure they have access to women and to have their erections serviced as if it's a human right.
empowerment is a total fucking lie, its a trick, always was.
It's quite interesting to search MRA / PUA sources for the use of the term 'cultural marxism'
I know Anders Breivik's manifesto is full of MRA sort of stuff.
How much cross-over is there between this lot and the racist right I wonder?
Quite a bit of cross-over, although mostly on the fringes.
Case in point is that twat Dawkins retweeting an MRA tweet the other day, which contained white supremacist hidden material.
I'm trying to put my finger here on what they have in common and it's something like this.
Both white supremacists and MRA/PUA seem to feel that "cultural marxism" has somehow cheated them out of something they feel was theirs by right due to being white and/or male.
Roosh Valizadeh: Multiculturalism is a Government Plot to Displace 'Native-Born' AmericansMulticulturalism through immigration is not an accident and it’s not spontaneous. It’s sponsored and enabled by the U.S. federal government. Massive immigration is used by the government to destroy the social fabric and traditions of a country, setting up an effective divide-and-conquer strategy that makes you fearful, demoralized, weak, and distracted.
Immigration is a weapon used to weaken the strongest members of a society, its native-born citizens, so it’s harder for them to realize the crimes of their government and to gather the strength to fight back.
Open borders immigration is therefore an effective method of human control. This is why the government is on board with multiculturalism, and is actively displacing native-born Americans to make way for Third World immigrants.
Instead of encouraging Americans to have big healthy families, they’re bringing in foreigners instead who don’t even speak English.
What kernel of truth there is in phils argument is just this. And the 'open hypergamy' he observes isn't anything to do with the successes of feminism - it's evidence of the ongoing inequality of the sexes, a world where women still have to rely on men for their ongoing security.I haven't really been following these sections of the thread, but to play devil's advocate, I would say that no matter where men's looks factor into attraction for women, the very sad fact is that society seems to reinforce to men that it's what they do (being smart, being funny, being athletic, being musically talented, doing cool things, being a "good guy") that matters as far as attracting women, whereas women almost never get that reinforcement. The reinforcement women get is almost always about their looks.
Perhaps the key word here is 'tradition' ... ?
Their expectation is shaped by cultural archetypes (or something like) which economic and social realities no longer (if they ever did) support.
Bernie Gunther Also think it would be worth considering the extent to which both MRAs and the far right are outcroppings of the same economic pressures, that in this generation have been pushed towards misogyny rather than racism but underlying both is 40 years of neo-liberal economics and the loss of actual material benefits and also perceived entitlement (both economically and socially/sexually) and the anger that results from that, turned outward, in one towards other races and the other towards women, rather than toward capital.
But I get the impression that a lot of the MRAs are depressed young men (I think if you describe yourself as beta then you are probably depressed), and it'd be worth asking what that has to do with the existence of the MRA community, and whether there's a growing rate of depression that might be driving this (which also may be resulting from the neo-liberal economic pressures being introduced).
Yep, that's unfair. I think men getting involved and pulling up other men on their sexism is important. But of course yes, actions are even better.Yeah i never trust men who say they're feminists lol. I know that is unfair but imo actions speak louder than words and men who loudly proclaim their support for womens rights can be some of the worst creeps imaginable.
I'm trying to put my finger here on what they have in common and it's something like this.
Both white supremacists and MRA/PUA seem to feel that "cultural marxism" has somehow cheated them out of something they feel was theirs by right due to being white and/or male.
I was wondering about that kind of stuff too, but I'm not sure what to say about it.
I can certainly see that there's a relationship between neo-liberal economics and the near collapse of what you might call the white working class / lower middle class breadwinner / traditional male role-model possibilities in the communities around here (Merseyside)
The online variety of MRA seems to profile younger and maybe a bit more educated though? Something about role-model confusion maybe?
First you phwaooor, then you go awwwhhhhhh
From what i can glean the MRA types are from more middle class, educated, backgrounds then the far right. But the the younger ones may be growing up saddled with debt, struggling to afford a mortgage and if you add social isolation and latent misogyny into that mix your going to get some pretty embittered individuals who can now find each other via social media. On their own I dont think they're ever going to be anything more than a nasty fringe - but they add new toxic perspectives to existing reactionary discourses.
What are you hoping to demonstrate by quoting some random weirdos off twitter?Mainly random weirdos, just a selection of those that use the term regressive left.
Apart from majid nawaz. He runs the Quilliam Foundation.
I was interested to see a cross-section of idiots using the rl label, thanks.What are you hoping to demonstrate by quoting some random weirdos off twitter?