beesonthewhatnow
going deaf for a living
He needs to look in one of his mirrorseditor said:
Robert Fisk: Even I question the 'truth' about 9/11
- Thread starter Barking_Mad
- Start date
editor said:
I've no idea, and nor does it matter. I have to assume you mean they have a negative memory. In any case i'm not here on some kind of popularity mission, i'm just here doing what you presumably set these boards up for. Spouting my tuppence worth.
But if i go back to the time of the tsunami i recall you amongst many posters who expressed concerned about my whereabouts at the time on various posts. So what you're saying here doesn't really ring true, unless your concern was not sincere.
Lastly. only i can know what my self image is by the very nature of the meaning of this term. How on earth could you know unless you're in my mind?
editor said:
It's most likely that you are the biggest contributor to these threads.
I have not once 'trotted out' anything about 'truthseekers', this is just your own tosh you like to put into people's mouths. I'm only talking for myself and any other people who want answers to so many dodgy aspects about the events, and who have expressed the belief that complicity is more than a possibility, ie who suspect that this was the case.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
fela fan said:
And in what way then are you not a conspiracy theorist?
butchersapron said:
It's pretty difficult to make any sense out of this post. Firstly there are too many actual language problems, and also because it seems your memory and your perceptions of me are somewhat mixed up and confused.
Chomsky has caused no such doubts in my mind. I merely expressed a surprise about chomsky's views on the events. I've made no assumptions.
I built no trap, you manufactured it in your own mind. I have great respect for many things chomsky has written, and don't consider him an idiot or a hero.
Get a bloody grip man.
It is the same with so much "criticism" of officialdom. The critics over-egg the pudding so much that the genuine points are lost in the blizzard of shite. And even when officialdom does recognise that there is a valid point, the blizzard of shite gives them plenty of opportunity to obfuscate or ignore.Roadkill said:
Why is it that so few of those who put themselves forward as campaigners for some or other cause seem to have understood the parable of the little boy who cried wolf ...
butchersapron said:
In every way.
I have nothing to do with conspiracies, how can i, i neither hold power or want it.
Furthermore my interest in 911 lies in the dodgy stuff surrounding the events, not in any theories. I have no time for theories or conspiracies, complete waste of time in my life to worry about such stuff.
That is an emphatic nothing to do with them at all. But you seem to have serious problems accepting what i tell you. You've even blatantly called me a liar before, so no worries, you either believe what i say about myself or you believe i'm a liar. Your call mate, nothing to do with me.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
You honestly can't follow a stright line from one of your posts to the next can you?
This is when you assumed that he agreed with you, when i poointed out that no, on the contrary he attacks you and people like you, suddenly:
And this morning for example - you claim not to be a conspiracy theorist in one post then in the next you say that you believe the US was complicit in the 911 attacks. All in the space of about 15 minutes.
fela said:
This is when you assumed that he agreed with you, when i poointed out that no, on the contrary he attacks you and people like you, suddenly:
And this morning for example - you claim not to be a conspiracy theorist in one post then in the next you say that you believe the US was complicit in the 911 attacks. All in the space of about 15 minutes.
editor said:
I said this: "It's most likely that you are the biggest contributor to these threads."
Most likely.
these threads.
Whoops! Your reading skills, or lack of them, exposed again editor!
And anyway, of the six posters, how many of them are 'pro-conspiracy posters'? These were your words to describe the heaviest contributors. Since you want to suddenly concentrate on just this thread, go on, tell us mate, how many?
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
fela fan said:
That's a very odd and peculiar definition of conspiracy theorist there fela - i'd go as far as to say that it's unique to you. Conspiracy theorists are those who carry out conspiracies.
You're the living definition of a conspiracy theorist i'm afraid.I believe that you're liar and deluded as well for the record as you seem to want an answer.
butchersapron said:
Another post full of your interpretations posited as facts. You cannot distinguish between what i might believe or think and what your perceptions are of what i believe and think.
I don't claim anything by the way.
Now just be satisfied with yourself that you take me to be a liar and leave it at that. How do you expect to have a decent debate with who you feel to be a liar? Why do you bother?
butchersapron said:
You're funny mate. If you wish to lay any kind of claim to intelligence you'd never succumb to such judgements on a person you know just about nothing of. Since i'm a completely rational and truthful person your beliefs are spectacularly wrong.
But interestingly you've made the age-old error of judging the debaters, not debating the subject matter. Again.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
That's not an error fela, that's a sensible thing to do and one of the reasons that i'm not as gullible as you and your conspiracy theorist mates - a shocking lack of a important critical faculty on your part - it's why you lot are taken in by duff sources time and time over.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
fela fan said:
I don't expect to have a decent debate with you fela, no one does anymore. Why do i bother? I like to see what knots you can tie yourself in now and again and what heights of slef-deluding gibberish you can reach.
Bob_the_lost
Elsewhere
Of course i fucking read up on it, even if i hadn't the answers are easy to find.fela fan said:
Timeline carefully reproduced by 8den here: http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=6315898&postcount=128
editor
hiraethified
*Three seconds research later:fela fan said:
No. The original is from here:
http://www.debunk911myths.org/topics/index.php?title=NORAD
Be sure to offer your critique and highlight the damning flaws.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
re-search? I'm confused.
beesonthewhatnow
going deaf for a living
Jesus, it really is too easy , isn't it?editor said:
Come on conspiraloons, at least try and make it a wee bit difficult to show what twats you are
editor said:
On what basis do you decide that this particular website is able to provide you with facts that you are so freely able to accept on their say so? You are so quick to deride certain sites, so i'm wondering what factors you require that allow you to decide a site so able to present facts for you.
beesonthewhatnow said:Jesus, it really is too easy , isn't it?
Come on conspiraloons, at least try and make it a wee bit difficult to show what twats you are
And you too seem easily persuaded to believe whatever this particular website posts up. How have you decided upon their ability to present facts? You weren't there, you have no experience of that day, how do you decide what to believe and what not to believe?
I note that, despite many times me telling you i'm nothing to do with all that stupid terminology of CTers that you continue to label me as a conspiraloon. Shame on you. Your ability to believe what you want to believe is exactly the same charge you level at others.
8den said:
I don't think you need to address people in such impolite terms.
Tell me why you are able to accept what vanity fair say as being factually correct. You too are appearing to accept certain sources as some kind of authority on the truth.
Are you always so easily persuaded by other media?
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
What time is it in Thailand right now fela?
Similar threads
- Locked
