Robert Fisk: Even I question the 'truth' about 9/11

[fela fan]

Are you going to offer your critique and highlight the damning flaws in that article or not?

Funny, when i hit the quote button, i'm wanting to reply to you asking me if i'm going to answer any of your questions or not. Then this comes up. I hit the back button, but no, my mind has not gone mad.

You hadn't asked me any questions for me to answer, but perhaps you've just completely changed your post, realising that your poor reading skills have surfaced yet again, and this time it's poor reading of what you have actually written yourself!!!!

 

[fela fan]

What time is it in Thailand right now fela?

I've already said goodbye to you. It's permanent. Why should i talk to somebody like you who simply wants to label me a liar and a deluded person, and who likes to lay traps to unknown persons on some website on the net?

You're a sad fucker butchers, and you can keep your negativity to yourself. I want no more of it.

 

[editor]

Funny, when i hit the quote button, i'm wanting to reply to you asking me if i'm going to answer any of your questions or not. Then this comes up. I hit the back button, but no, my mind has not gone mad.

You hadn't asked me any questions for me to answer, but perhaps you've just completely changed your post, realising that your poor reading skills have surfaced yet again, and this time it's poor reading of what you have actually written yourself!!!!

This is the classic, conspiraloon-like weaselling that you're well known for here.

Rather than addressing the issue and the relevent points raised, you prefer to trade cheap, childish personal insults.

It's pathetic, it really is.

 

[fela fan]

Are you going to offer your critique and highlight the damning flaws in that article or not?

And so let me reply to the totally revamped post of yours.

No i'm not.

None of us has any facts. You deride certain websites that don't meet with your approval, yet are more than happy to quote others in defence of your stated facts. Amazing. Hypocritical.

You didn't just edit that post, you completely changed it. That indicates that you speak before you engage your brain. That fits with what i know about your lack of reading skills.

 

[jæd]

None of us has any facts. You deride certain websites that don't meet with your approval, yet are more than happy to quote others in defence of your stated facts. Amazing. Hypocritical.

So how come you know the sites to trust then...?

 

[fela fan]

Rather than addressing the issue and the relevent points raised, you prefer to trade cheap, childish personal insults.

It's pathetic, it really is.

You're speaking about yourself again editor. You are a past master at being the child and dishing out personal insults. And even as you accuse me of levelling personal insults at you i haven't actually done anything of the sort!!

You are unreal. How can you take yourself so seriously? How can you be so unaware that you are what you say others are??

 

[tarannau]

You are unreal. How can you take yourself so seriously? How can you be so unaware that you are what you say others are??

Love the delusion. Keep on denying you're a conspiraloon by the way.

 

[jæd]

You're speaking about yourself again editor. You are a past master at being the child and dishing out personal insults.

Any examples of this then...?

 

[butchersapron]

None of us has any facts. .

Are you sure?

 

[fela fan]

So how come you know the site to trust then...?

I've never said i did.

But one site i've often posted up is cooperativeresearch and their excellent timelines. The reason it seems a good one to me (note, 'good one' not one that i can trust implicitly) is that its whole content is taken from mainstream media.

No-one ever disagrees with its content, they just don't comment on it. It's far too comprehensive for anyone to disagree with, so they just ignore it.

Here mate, why don't you try it?

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

 

[editor]

How can you be so unaware that you are what you say others are??

fela fan, a few hours earlier:

And what butchers describes in no way can be attributed to me. Any reasonable poster who's been around on these threads will know that.

fela fan then ignores the long line of posters who 'have been around on these threads' positively queuing up to say that he is exactly how Butchers describes him!

Can't you read what people say about you, fela?

 

[fela fan]

Any examples of this then...?

Shedloads of them mate, over five years. Why?

 

[Bob_the_lost]

Reputable source vs. well, nothing contradicts them.

I'm going with the reputable source thanks. Fela, you're out of your league here, give up.

 

[editor]

Here mate, why don't you try it?

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

So how does that site make the Vanity Fair article wrong or innacurate, please?

 

[jæd]

Shedloads of them mate, over five years. Why?

Got a link to any one of these "shedloads"...?

 

[butchersapron]

I've never said i did.

But one site i've often posted up is cooperativeresearch and their excellent timelines. The reason it seems a good one to me (note, 'good one' not one that i can trust implicitly) is that its whole content is taken from mainstream media.

The same mainstream media that you've spent 5 years lambasting as unreliable?

 

[fela fan]

fela fan, a few hours earlier:
fela fan then ignores the long line of posters who 'have been around on these threads' positively queuing up to say that he is exactly how Butchers describes him!

Can't you read what people say about you, fela?

You've done it again. You've completely changed a post. But to answer this one that no longer exists on this thread, except that it does coz i'm now quoting it, i don't give a toss about what anyone says about me editor.

The fact that you pose the question means that you do care. Don't impose your own life on mine.

Positively queuing up eh? Yer a laugh mate.

Now, let me deal with the completely revamped post...

 

[jæd]

I've never said i did.

But one site i've often posted up is cooperativeresearch and their excellent timelines. The reason it seems a good one to me (note, 'good one' not one that i can trust implicitly) is that its whole content is taken from mainstream media.

And mainstream media never-ever gets things wrong, omits things for brevity or just plain makes stuff up...?

 

[editor]

Positively queuing up eh? Yer a laugh mate.

Hands up who agrees with Butcher's opinion of fela?

*me!

 

[fela fan]

Got a link to any one of these "shedloads"...?

What?? You expect me to keep records of shit?

No links at all mate. Accept what i say or reject it. Take your pick. But editor knows, or at least he should know, depends on his levels of self-delusion.

 

[fela fan]

Hands up who agrees with Butcher's opinion of fela?

*me!

Ah look, the desperation, appealing to the masses.

 

[jæd]

What?? You expect me to keep records of shit?

Why not just use the search function...? If there's "shedloads" then I expect they're easy to find.

No links at all mate. Accept what i say or reject it. Take your pick. But editor knows, or at least he should know, depends on his levels of self-delusion.

So you aren't going to back-up your own point...? I don't think the Editors the one thats deluded...

 

[editor]

So how does that site make the Vanity Fair article wrong or innacurate, please?

Waits for a wriggle-free answer...

 

[tarannau]

Nope, but surely if there are that many you won't have a problem referencing at least one.



I can find lots of posts calling you a delusional conspiraloon in a matter of less than a minute FWIW. Of course, you claim you don't care about what people think about you, but you'll keep on posting heavily. Isn't it time for another ineffective flounce and an episode of you throwing your toys out of the pram again?

 

[fela fan]

And mainstream media never-ever gets things wrong, omits things for brevity or just plain makes stuff up...?

Why jaed, you're not imposing your own ideas on what i say are you? Now where i've seen that before...??

I mean, have i said that? Or are you just simply reading things into what i did say? It must be a disease in britain or something. You all seem to do it without realising. Oh well. As you are.

 

[editor]

Take your pick. But editor knows, or at least he should know, depends on his levels of self-delusion.

I'm getting very bored with your endless personal attacks in this thread. They're making you look awfully hypocritical too, you know.

 

[butchersapron]

Ah look, the desperation, appealing to the masses.

What's wrong with the masses?

 

[fela fan]

Why not just use the search function...? If there's "shedloads" then I expect they're easy to find.



So you aren't going to back-up your own point. I don't think the Editors the thats deluded...

Yeah, but i've got zero motivation to use any search function. I think the editor is this, you think he's that. Fine.

And how many editors are there anyway?


I should add, to be fair to you, that editor's been doing this for five years. So why would i keep records of it? He does it, that's okay. I have my reaction, that's okay. It's all part of the game. But don't expect me to provide any evidence. I can't be arsed with that. You take what i say any which way mate.

 

[editor]

I mean, have i said that? Or are you just simply reading things into what i did say? It must be a disease in britain or something. You all seem to do it without realising. Oh well. As you are.

Right. So it's not your inability to express yourself that's at fault here - it must be down to all of Britain suffering some kind of disease!

 

[jæd]

Why jaed, you're not imposing your own ideas on what i say are you? Now where i've seen that before...??

I mean, have i said that? Or are you just simply reading things into what i did say? It must be a disease in britain or something. You all seem to do it without realising. Oh well. As you are.

Ho-hum. You said that information derived from mainstream media can be trusted or "good". I'm pointing out the mainstream media isn't perfect...