Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

riots in paris banlieu...

TeeJay said:
But where is your evidence that these protests are against "capitalism"?

In their existance as protest within a capitalist society. In a free market capitalist society what else can sustained 'illegal' protest be against?
 
He doesn't even know what kind of communist/anarchist he is let alone protest against capitalism.
 
where to said:
this is not religiously motivated - especially when the rioters are mixed religion and race, i don't know why on earth they are saying that.

It makes them feel more comfortable to think that is just that, and to tell others the same lest they start getting ideas in their heads.
 
TeeJay said:
But where is your evidence that these protests are against "capitalism"?


Quite, I would have though the protests are precisely because they are being excluded from joining in capitalism.
 
They aren't excluded from capitalism, they are very much a part of it, just at a shitty end of it, one that is difficult to escape from.
 
The French political élite has no interest in advancing a neo-liberal agenda. The only part of French political life that is interested in doing so are those companies that exist as the 2nd tier and below in French industry - within the business élite in France (Elf Aquitaine, PSA, BNP, Credit Agricole etc) the boards are so deeply embedded inside the political system as it currently stands to want change - a switch to neo-liberal economics would fundamentally alter the dirigiste model that supports the National Champions when times get tough. Quite simply while there is vocal support for neo-lib policies from some quarters, the actual bedrock of the French political system is against it.

Not to mention that such comments show a misunderstanding of how France sees itself. If nothing else, the adoption of such a savage and unplanned, uncontrollable system as A-S Capitalism would be seen as a failure of the State and, for want of a better word, distasteful to the French.
 
888 said:
(Damn, should have joined this conversation before...)



The term racaille was also used by the French bourgeoisie to justify repressing the Paris Commune. Also used by the radical french working class to identify themselves in the 19th/20th centuries.

Anyway racaille does essentially mean scum, kyzer.

Aside from 5 online French-English dictionarys saying it translates as 'rabble' of course...

Not trying to back Sarko here but seriously...

And on the subject of Bigfish's comments about agent provocatuers...the article (sourced from ONE eyewitness with no corroboration from another source) basically says that the night it kicked off there was a large police presence after the two youths (or youth...the article isn't clear on youths or youth being chased, altho that can be put down to bad subbing since they even misspell the witnesses name later, changing it from 'Germa' to 'German') had died and we walking down the streets. Nothing in the article metions that outside of actually being there, the police didn't start any fights, didn't raid any homes. It was simply their presence that started the problems.

Now, in my mind 'provoking' requires more than simply passive presence - maybe I'm wrong but 'to provoke' is to actively create a situation.

Anyway, here's the article again...

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/nov2005/fran-n05.shtml
 
Apparently they've unearthed some 50-year-old law which will allow them to enforce a curfew in the banlieue from tonight.

Anyone any more info on what de Villepin's extra resources for the banlieue thing will actually mean?
 
Lea said:
Not content with torching their neighbours' cars, many schools have been set on fire, including an 'ecole maternelle' (kindergarten school) 5 minutes from where I live.

Ecole Maternelle incendiée à Achères
are you in yvellines? i used to live in elancourt, near trappes when i was younger. i'd love to now exactly whats been going on locally there, if you could give me more details :)
 
Hello whereto!

Yes, I live in Yvelines. Not much is happening in the town where I live. It's quiet middle class town. There aren't many big blocks of HLMs in this town. I live just one stop after Acheres on the RER line. Acheres is much more "populaire" a town. Local trouble spots near to where I live include a town called Chanteloup Les Vignes. It has alot of HLMs and a notorious reputation. Everytime I drive through there is always broken glass from smashed telephone kiosks or shop windows and lots of youths hanging around the streets.
 
TeeJay said:
You are claiming that *every* protest is a protest against capitalism? :D

I'm suggesting that protest becomes 'illegal' when it's deemed to be a threat to the existing social and economic order. Not all protest is deemed 'illegal'. The reaction of the French state in introducing curfews, increasing police numbers and threatening to send in the army suggests they see it as a threat against the existing social and economic order. A white person dies and it becomes a 'race riot', a church is torched and it becomes a 'religious riot'. Thousands of cars have been torched so maybe it's just a big RTS eh?

What do you think it's about TeeJay?
 
Rutita1 said:
So they introduce a curfew and then what?
Hope that the problems will go away?

It's all about wanting to appear macho before the electorate. The presidential election is around 2 years away.
 
TeeJay said:
But where is your evidence that these protests are against "capitalism"?
Quite. I imagine if anyone went and suggested to the rioters that they descend on parliament, they'd laugh in their face. Much easier to target their own neighbourhood, eh? :rolleyes:

I think people need to face it - this isn't any sort of progressive uprising. I'm amazed some people are rushing to try and portay it as such, when much of it appears very unpleasant and devoid of working-class politics at all. Indeed - how can smashing up fellow-working class people's cars, buses and services or beating fellow-working class people up be in any way progressive?
 
soulman said:
I'm suggesting that protest becomes 'illegal' when it's deemed to be a threat to the existing social and economic order. Not all protest is deemed 'illegal'. The reaction of the French state in introducing curfews, increasing police numbers and threatening to send in the army suggests they see it as a threat against the existing social and economic order. A white person dies and it becomes a 'race riot', a church is torched and it becomes a 'religious riot'. Thousands of cars have been torched so maybe it's just a big RTS eh?

What do you think it's about TeeJay?

Has anyone invovled in French politics actually USED either of those terms? And is this really a protest or just random acts of violence and civil disorder with no real aim or purpose?
 
kyser_soze said:
Has anyone invovled in French politics actually USED either of those terms? And is this really a protest or just random acts of violence and civil disorder with no real aim or purpose?
Depends on how you define protest though. These people certainly aren't trying to show Sarzoky how much they love him.
 
kyser_soze said:
And is this really a protest or just random acts of violence and civil disorder with no real aim or purpose?
every kid i have heard interviewed says they won't stop til sarkozy resigns
 
nino_savatte said:
It's all about wanting to appear macho before the electorate. The presidential election is around 2 years away.
sorry but the curfew is the fairest thing they can do right now for all concerned. these politicians aren't going to become communists or anarchists or whatever you are over night so really all you can hope for is that they stop to tackle the roots of the problems, try and stop the rioting which is destroying the services, and start working together (sarko chirac and villepin) rather than the fucking pointscoring that has been going on and the bravado rhetoric of scum like sarkozy. sitting back and sneering at their attempts to actually put out this fire shows you up to be merely a self satisfied ideologue bore.

:oops: :D
 
Just been on the news a 50 year old law is being implemented to allow local curfews and house searches for weapons. (I assume without the French equivalent of a warrant) I believe this was last used in Algeria.
An interviewed police chief did not seem too happy a bunny with these extra powers.
 
tobyjug said:
Just been on the news a 50 year old law is being implemented to allow local curfews and house searches for weapons. (I assume without the French equivalent of a warrant) I believe this was last used in Algeria.
An interviewed police chief did not seem too happy a bunny with these extra powers.
why not?
 
Imagine yourself as a Police Chief in France at the moment.

The streets are going off and you've just been tasked with enforcing a curfew that includes the right to enter and search houses in communities that you probably don't already have great relations with, and that are the main participants in the current violence.

I wouldn't exactly be happy being charged with a job and powers that are almost certain to make things a lot worse, and then have to take the shit for it.
 
kyser_soze said:
I wouldn't exactly be happy being charged with a job and powers that are almost certain to make things a lot worse, and then have to take the shit for it.

Quite, and getting shot at with a 12 bore at close range inside a building (even if you are wearing body armour) is lot more dangerous than the police being shot at with 12 bores out in the street as has happened in the last few days.
 
Rutita1 said:
And you are so obviously qualified to judge...'post war at least'? ...I don't think these riots are only down to unsatisified council tenents.....

who said that they were down to "unsatisfied council tenants" :confused: :confused:
 
bigfish said:
The kids are rioting because they've been provoked into it by Sarkosy's paramilitary police operations in some of the most deprived suburbs of Paris. The French political establishment are taking a rightward turn and utilizing anti-immigrant hysteria in the process.

I hear that some of the kids are torching cars just so that they can see their area on national TV.

The latest I hear is that the government are "reactivating" a law from 1955. Curfews to be imposed in certain areas.

Earlier in the thread there was a discussion about the word "racaille" - the word "rabble" being used as the English translation. Would the popular word "chavs" often used by the British press be a good modern translation of the word.
 
Back
Top Bottom