Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Riot going on now in Bristol - Stokes Croft

If, anywhere around my house and garden shed, I am found to have:

a can of petrol
some empty bottles awaiting recycling
some bits of paper towel or cloth

can I be arrested for having "potential petrol bombs"?

Giles..

Of course, but it can happen even if you don't have the petrol, or the bottles, or the bits of paper towel or cloth.
 
Defence of small businesses against the big bad supermarkets is plainly petit bourgois politics.

Some people, of course, don't give a shit about that issue, but are upset about some squatters being evicted - which has nothing to do with Tescos.

Of course, some are just keen on riots. Riots are fun, I suppose.
 
So far as I am aware not one single Tesco Express that I know of replaced an empty shop, they were ALL independent shops that Tesco bought up.

See Alfreton Road, NG7

There are loads and loads of empty commercial premises in Nottingham. Alfreton Road has more than its fair share. Tesco is currently doing up one place there. I'm not sure what it was before it last closed down, but I think it might have been a car dealership.
 
Defence of small businesses against the big bad supermarkets is plainly petit bourgois politics.

It isnt - small businesses usually employ more people than a Tescos will do in replacing them, they pay more in tax (or rather avoid tax less) and dont usually seek to use their size to intimidate journalists and politicians into going along with what they are up to.
 
That's actually not a bad piece as it goes. A little breathless and you can tell she was 200 miles away but still better than the crap that has been printed elsewhere, which is basically Avon And Somerset plods press releases.

(Of course, that doesn't deal with how and why she gets yo write something rather than someone else)
 
went by earlier. the squat is still occupied as far as i could see. police forensics were out dusting for fingerprints on the smashed windows. shame to see the bike shop next door had a window smashed too.
 
An interview with a spokesman for the 'People's Republic of Stokes Croft' has just been broadcast on Radio 4. What a stream of cant! "Street art... vibrant... diverse..."

He disowned the riot, though. Smashing things up is not the way, apparently.
 
Probably more to do with pissed up yoot?

yeah that. apparently he was told to stop doing it pretty sharpish by everyone else. there was someone (dunno if they were representing anyone) going around the crowd this afternoon rattling a tin to pay for broken windows of other shops.
 
it would have been illegal for the Council to refuse planning permission for this shop on the grounds that they don't like the firm that will operate it.

of all the things to riot over this one really has me puzzled. i wonder how Cameron feels about this. good distraction i'd of thought.

will it kick off again tonight now? either the cops protect the store and risk getting rounded on or they leave it and it gets attacked again. this will run on throughout the weekend i'd of thought. would be interested in the local views on that.
 
i don't think the legal argument over the planning case consisted of 'we don't like tesco'. it was slightly more complicated than that.
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/apr/22/bristol-riot-tesco

JHE - this article from a local says 96% of a survey of 700 people opposed tescos. I'd say that is a fairly broad local opposition comprising of most people. I don't know how many people live in and close to stokes croft though.

Weltweit- I know fuck all about planning but do the wishes of local residences not need to be taken into account? Do you not think that the people who actually live in an area where something is going to happen should be able to say we don't want it hear, and have their voices listened to. 2,500 complaints against tescos..
 
People who are still banging on about this being a 'Tesco riot' - have you actually read a damn thing I've had to say about this? At all? THERE'S MORE TO IT THAN BLOODY TESCO
 
I know fuck all about planning but do the wishes of local residences not need to be taken into account?

in a word, no. a petition of 5000 is given zero consideration if the arguments it is based on are not relevant in planning terms. one person's letter raising salient planning-relevant points is far more powerful. that's the way things are at present in planning but funnily enough I think the Tories are trying to change that in England to allow more middle class nimbyism.

the actual Councillors (who I assume made the final decision here, based upon the Council Officer's recommendation for approval in all likelihood) would have been in a better position to refuse on more dubious grounds though (i.e. found an excuse to refuse. and it surprises me that they didn't).

worth remembering too that the planning permission wasn't granted for a Tesco Express, but simply for a medium sized shop (albeit one with Tesco Express signage).
 
in a word, no. a petition of 5000 is given zero consideration if the arguments it is based on are not relevant in planning terms. one person's letter raising salient planning-relevant points is far more powerful. that's the way things are at present in planning but funnily enough I think the Tories are trying to change that in England to allow more middle class nimbyism.

the actual Councillors (who I assume made the final decision here, based upon the Council Officer's recommendation for approval in all likelihood) would have been in a better position to refuse on more dubious grounds though (i.e. found an excuse to refuse. and it surprises me that they didn't).

worth remembering too that the planning permission wasn't granted for a Tesco Express, but simply for a medium sized shop (albeit one with Tesco Express signage).

That's pretty dissapointing tbh, but I've replied to planning applications with objections on the basis that those objections would have some relevance - this was for change of usage of a premises to being a takeaway food outlet though and the objections were on the basis of extra traffic, no need for more food outlets around us and not really health and safety (but can't remember the proper term) wrt attracting more rats/foxes etc..

iirc the vote on the application was 3-3 with the chair casting the deciding vote in favour and noting that if it went against tesco would appeal and this would cost BCC in legal fees..
So it's not at all clear cut and the balance may have been tipped by the thought that tescos might win on appeal and the possible cost for the council of that happening.

embree said:
People who are still banging on about this being a 'Tesco riot' - have you actually read a damn thing I've had to say about this? At all? THERE'S MORE TO IT THAN BLOODY TESCO

^^this is a local person talking. Listen to them..
But unfortunately embree you're going to have to work hard to get the tesco line out of peoples heads and connect them to issues of gentrification and the loss of Stokes Croft & the lack of local democracy which are the wider issues I'm hearing - plus of course the defence of the squat by local residents of both Stokes Croft and St Pauls.
 
Sometimes I think it's hard enough trying to make people in other parts of Bristol aware of the issues we're facing here let alone anywhere else. Ultimately I can see attitudes hardening to 'bollocks to anyone else, we're sticking with each other on this one'. Seeing my community slagged off in various ways as either a 'crime ridden hell hole' or a trustifarian paradise rather than somewhere with complex local issues, a lot of vulnerable people but a fierce community spirit is difficult. I don't give a shit what people in Redland or Cotham think tbh, again they're part of our problem.
 
Back
Top Bottom