Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

RCP/Spiked/IoI

There's a full article with details of the above here.

quick question - this statement in the article:

Furedi is the leader of the cult/front group behind Spiked and a dozen connected groups collectively known as the LM Network. Posturing as ‘left’ but advocating a range of far-right causes under the banner of libertarianism the group are widely thought to be a black-ops or agent provocateur group with high-level backing.

Is this widely thought?

Everything after "libertarianism" is pretty much shite, I'd say. They seem to take their lead more from what the "think tanks" are theorising, than from Century House. The only people I've ever heard labelling LM/IoI/RCP etc as "state" were Occupy! types, who seemed to buy into every CT from James Dean's death being 'cos he was bisexual, to Liz Windsor-Saxe-Coburg being an 8ft bipedal lizard.
 
I remember in the 90s many militant types and swappies arguing that the RCP were funded by mi5. I dont think its that bonkers. We know that undercovers were infiltrating pretty much every radical political group that ever met upstairs in a pub once a week. ideological shit stirring may well have been part of their brief. Maybe their arguments won over the like of ferudi? Who knows?
 
Someone told me once is that one of the RCP inner circle married a rich woman. Of course, that wouldn't rule out MI5 money as well.

Off chitter:

DMnob-wXcAAnrL9.jpg:large
 
Claire Fox on R4 Moral Maze right now, talking 'bout luv.
Melanie Phillips, the thinking Mail readers Katie Hopkins, on too.
I assume they're in the same studio.
This does not disprove my hypothesis that they're really the same person however.
Poidh.
 
Claire Fox on R4 Moral Maze right now, talking 'bout luv.
Melanie Phillips, the thinking Mail readers Katie Hopkins, on too.
I assume they're in the same studio.
This does not disprove my hypothesis that they're really the same person however.
Poidh.
Claire Fox passess the Turing Test for a few sentences. When I saw her for the first time on some programme or other she didn't seem to have a swivel eyed appearance and her speech had a reasonably normal cadence. Then thirty seconds in, you think 'I must have heard that wrong', another few sentences and you are still thinking you might be misunderstanding her. Then the awful truth dawns - she's the full trumpet.
 
Claire Fox passess the Turing Test for a few sentences. When I saw her for the first time on some programme or other she didn't seem to have a swivel eyed appearance and her speech had a reasonably normal cadence. Then thirty seconds in, you think 'I must have heard that wrong', another few sentences and you are still thinking you might be misunderstanding her. Then the awful truth dawns - she's the full trumpet.

Clare Fox often deploys her "speaking as a radical, working class feminist" catchphrase before launching into a argument defending sex abusers, racists, the powerful generally or climate change denial. Always comes across as a bit of a div as well.
 
Clare Fox often deploys her "speaking as a radical, working class feminist" catchphrase before launching into a argument defending sex abusers, racists, the powerful generally or climate change denial. Always comes across as a bit of a div as well.

'Speaking as a rabid, delusional contrarian...' would display more self-awareness.
 
Spiked mob now calling out leftists for encouraging Corbyn to sue Ben Bradley for slander over a deleted tweet backing the bogus Czech spy allegations. Saying it infringes free speech. Is this the same mob who were threatening people with legal action for calling them the “ Furedi Cult”?
 
Mixed up in the red-brown, pro-assad, holocaust denial milieu now it seems:

Assad’s Confused Apologists: Academics in The Times

But this isn’t the first time that members of this Working Group have boosted such pro-Assad conspiracies, as earlier this year, Tara McCormack, a leading member of the group based at the University of Leicester, tweeted the following comment:

“It is also an established fact that a) the White Helmets are basically Al Q (they provide most of the reporting from Jihadi held areas and b) that hospitals are used as bases by these groups.” (February 5, 2018)

Such pro-Assad propaganda does not materialise out of nothing, and members of the Working Group lean heavily upon the writings of leading libertarian conspiracy theorists like Vanessa Beeley. For those who don’t know, Beeley is an Assad regime propagandist who is counted as an associate editor for 21st Century Wire — a website closely associated with Alex Jones’ notorious US-based conspiracy outlet, InfoWars.

Tara McCormack also happens to be a longstanding contributor to the libertarian magazine Spiked Online – a magazine which has more in common with The Times than with any forces on the left of political spectrum. Indeed, as highlighted on an independent investigative wiki page, Spiked was previously run by Times columnist Mick Hume, and “is part of the libertarian anti-environmental” group which has the Orwellian name, the Living Marxism Network (which bears no relation to any Marxist ideas that I am familiar with, and I am a Marxist). To get a flavour of typical fare published in Spiked, recent articles not only dismiss the existence of a pay-gap between men and women, but also rail against “Jeremy Corbyn’s cult of youth” over his pledge to promote free bus travel.
 
In their defence, there's not many political groupings that are quite as consistent as they are. Shame it's being wrong they're so consistent at.
 
This lot were the subject of an article by Brian Whitaker on al-bab back in February which I imagine is the source of the Times 'expose'.

The Syrian conflict's anti-propaganda propagandists - al-bab.com


Incidentally I could have done without elements of that Leicester Socialist blog post while I was eating my lunch :
Let’s be clear, the rabid attacks upon Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership of the Labour Party by the billionaire-classes’ corrupt press are an attempt to undermine his determination to fight to represent the needs of the many instead of the capitalist few.
Pass the sick bag.
 
I guess Monbiot is publishing tomorrow whatever, and already has the figures so they're just getting it out first.

It's funny how it starts with the whine about no one taking anything in good faith*, before revealing the cash and its source.
They'd have been better off with two different articles.

* - which I'd agree with, actually - if you count or discount all arguments or proposed facts solely on who is saying them, or who they are paid by, then any progress is impossible
 
Back
Top Bottom