I was a bit surprised. I mean it's a right wage and people on 80k shouldn't be moaning but the 5% surprised me. Although if you look at the HMRC stats behind it, it does relate to income tax only, so excludes those who pay themselves a lower income and take dividend - which is how a high proportion of big earners will operateUnlike killer b i have zero sympathy with the 80k it consultant-hoist with his own petard on national TV.Having said that it came as a surprise to me that those earning over 80k p.a are actually as small a segment of the UK population as five per cent.If the pay-structure of all large companies had to be made public on an annual basis it seems to me that this in itself would represent a radical step forward in tackling inequality and the divisions in our society.When no-one knows what the next guy or gal is earning it is,surely,an unhealthy situation.
I don't think a lot of people on around that salary do much in the way of tax avoidance which would take them out of the figures, at least not IME - it just isn't a very large sector of the population. It's a very mouthy one though, with a lot of connection to journalists, and they don't recognise that they are unusual because that's the world they live in.I was a bit surprised. I mean it's a right wage and people on 80k shouldn't be moaning but the 5% surprised me. Although if you look at the HMRC stats behind it, it does relate to income tax only, so excludes those who pay themselves a lower income and take dividend - which is how a high proportion of big earners will operate
I don't really mean active tax avoidance, just that a lot of big earners aren't employees. No company director is going to pay everything as income. But yeah I don't think it will throw the figures out massivelyI don't think a lot of people on around that salary do much in the way of tax avoidance which would take them out of the figures, at least not IME - it just isn't a very large sector of the population. It's a very mouthy one though, with a lot of connection to journalists, and they don't recognise that they are unusual because that's the world they live in.
I don't have sympathy for him as such - I just don't think the price of challenging a politician on TV - even if you're an arsehole - should be getting monstered in the papers and on social media for days after.
Christ all fucking mighty, Lionel Shriver is a special kind of twat.
Don't really know anything about her tbh. But she was a disgrace last night.She didn't come across wonderfully, did she? I don't know her history, so does she have form in this area?
I thought McDonald did alright, and it was fun seeing Lewis laughed at for his mathematical skills.
She was on once a couple of years ago (at least). The only thing I can remember her saying was that everyone should be like Ireland with ultra low corporation taxes.She didn't come across wonderfully, did she? I don't know her history, so does she have form in this area?.
It mystifies me what differentiates some panellists from audience members. At least Owen Jones has a working life of some kind, but that Kate Andrews from 'The Institute of Economic Affairs' is an invention, a con that she should be so elevated.
I am founder of 'The Lewisham Forum of World Development' and have loads of opinions but never get invited on to Question Time, yet some of those vacuums are on endlessly.
People can get political punditry gigs simply for being opinionated without ever having actually done anything.
LOL.
I'll find you a couple of thousand links that say it was holographic planes that flew into the world trade centre and all the passengers are being kept captive in a Colorado mountain if you want.
Fucking Twitter and The fucking Canary.
Twitter seems to be full of people calling him a bellend this morning. I had to look him up but it doesn't seem out of character.Laurence Fox could be quite good tonight...."white privileged male"