Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Harry

I think the 80% of Russians who approve of Putin are wrong too. Do we have to wait some generations to find out if I'm right there too?

On a serious note, where are you finding that 80% of Russians support Putin? It certainly isn't borne out by reported comments by Russian people.

 
I might have missed it, but I'm pretty sure no one on here had suggested any of either Harry or Meghan's behaviour warrants death threats, so once again you seem to be setting up some sort of unjustified binary position.
Behaviour maybe not. What about being Royalty?
 
The monarch is the monarch by the will of the people, if the day comes when the people prefer a president, so be it.

I would point out that the split is 73% either for or not bothered either way, 27% against. I think the republicans have a way to go.

Looks like it'll be an easier route to a republic north of the border.

 
Sometimes people need things done for them. A home help would be ‘staff’. So would a cleaner, or a cook, or a gardener, or whatever, for someone elderly or disabled. So is a nanny or babysitter for that matter - that’s staff. People need childcare unless they have the finances and desire to be stay at home parents. Why shouldn’t people employ others?
I think you might guess I have no objection to disabled people having carers. All of that and plenty of other functions in our society being run for a profit, businesses with 'staff' is quite another thing... but for a different thread.

The idea of various princelings playing out their battle with all their allies in the media, the royal family with all it's 'staff'... the pompous shite of them, whilst still willing to get down in the dirt when it comes to media briefing.... all that shite is full of shite. It's all part of the trappings of power, the ideological apparatus of the state. And so it's absolutely fucking glorious when it all falls apart. You did ask.
 
On a serious note, where are you finding that 80% of Russians support Putin? It certainly isn't borne out by reported comments by Russian people.

I googled 'support for putin in russia' and there's a lot of different sources with similar figures. here's one. here's an article in the graun from last year. It's widely recognised that Putin enjoys very positive polling among Russians, as do many despots with the public of the countries their heel is on the neck of. Still. Will of the people huh.
 
I think you might guess I have no objection to disabled people having carers. All of that and plenty of other functions in our society being run for a profit, businesses with 'staff' is quite another thing... but for a different thread.

The idea of various princelings playing out their battle with all their allies in the media, the royal family with all it's 'staff'... the pompous shite of them, whilst still willing to get down in the dirt when it comes to media briefing.... all that shite is full of shite. It's all part of the trappings of power, the ideological apparatus of the state. And so it's absolutely fucking glorious when it all falls apart. You did ask.
I didn’t.

The question mark was rhetorical, but never mind.
 
It's the harpist should be bigging up his harvest on the field of slaughter if the bardic tradition means anything.
I'd rather pay someone to do that for me than have them squeeze my tooth paste out*. Being accompanied everywhere by a harpist would be fucking awesome. Although I wonder if a stylophoneist would be cheaper.


(*NOT a euphemism)
 
Nobody allowed to have or be a secretary. Nobody allowed to have or be all kinds of things. What a puritanical prescriptive world it would be.
Quite the reverse, no-one being in that position of superiority over anyone else merely by dint of privilege or wealth, what a glorious vision of a better way of living. No-one should aspire to that sort of social relationship, it's unhealthy. Collective provision including personal for those in genuine need of care is a different matter.
 
I might have missed it, but I'm pretty sure no one on here had suggested any of either Harry or Meghan's behaviour warrants death threats, so once again you seem to be setting up some sort of unjustified binary position.

Nah...there were a few posts about the staff who left and a suggestion that meghan has bullied people out..one allegedly taking a case against her ..or something. But these were among the reasons the Tabloids initially started targetting her and making her out to be a totally horrible person. We know what happened then with racist shit and hate directed at her. And we also know that death threads were made directly to her.
 
Quite the reverse, no-one being in that position of superiority over anyone else merely by dint of privilege or wealth, what a glorious vision of a better way of living. No-one should aspire to that sort of social relationship, it's unhealthy. Collective provision including personal for those in genuine need of care is a different matter.
OK.
 
Quite the reverse, no-one being in that position of superiority over anyone else merely by dint of privilege or wealth, what a glorious vision of a better way of living. No-one should aspire to that sort of social relationship, it's unhealthy. Collective provision including personal for those in genuine need of care is a different matter.
Except for personal harpists, obvs.
 
Sometimes people need things done for them. A home help would be ‘staff’. So would a cleaner, or a cook, or a gardener, or whatever, for someone elderly or disabled. So is a nanny or babysitter for that matter - that’s staff. People need childcare unless they have the finances and desire to be stay at home parents. Why shouldn’t people employ others?

Search for the threads about getting a cleaner. :D
 
Sign you up for the afternoon shift in the commune canteen then?
Not a fucking chance. I like choice in my life. I don’t really want things rationed out by central committee if the boys decide I’m worthy of whatever they deign to give. Ironically, it sounds a bit too capitalist - in result if not in spirit.
 
It’s easy to mock, but on a serious note it’s hard to make a living as a young musician, and a regular income helps your life go more smoothly.
TBF, it sounds like the first royal harpist wasn't being entirely serious, when he told queen vic his name was John Thomas.
 
Sorry, you're doing a collectivised tour of village halls somewhere dank out east. Watch that tuning!
Am I on after the person who reads out the collected thoughts of the Glorious Leader and before the bloke who makes balloon animals?
 
Not a fucking chance. I like choice in my life. I don’t really want things rationed out by central committee if the boys decide I’m worthy of whatever they deign to give. Ironically, it sounds a bit too capitalist - in result if not in spirit.
There is one, steamed buns or gruel.
 
Back
Top Bottom