Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Harry

Well no they were leaping well before that move.

As for the PA, I won't link to the mail but yeh it didnt sound very nice. She was Robbie Williams' PA before that gig and apparently he was less of a prima donna :D

Plenty people work with "difficult" and or "demanding" bosses.
Doesn't warrant death threats though.
 
Your belief in the primacy of the royal family isn't at all gullible though

I don't quite understand your comment. What do you mean by the 'primacy of the royal family'?

The King is a constitutional monarch, he has little actual power.

I prefer a monarch to a president, because that is how it has been for all of my life, I don't see the need to change things.

The monarch is the monarch by the will of the people, if the day comes when the people prefer a president, so be it.

I would point out that the split is 73% either for or not bothered either way, 27% against. I think the republicans have a way to go.
 
Is the bloke still a Prince?
Wouldn't be better if the merged thread were titled Harry Windsor?
 
Plenty people work with "difficult" and or "demanding" bosses.
Doesn't warrant death threats though.
I might have missed it, but I'm pretty sure no one on here had suggested any of either Harry or Meghan's behaviour warrants death threats, so once again you seem to be setting up some sort of unjustified binary position.
 
I might have missed it, but I'm pretty sure no one on here had suggested any of either Harry or Meghan's behaviour warrants death threats, so once again you seem to be setting up some sort of unjustified binary position.

Not here AFAIK, military boards are apparently awash with folk eager to shoot Harry with large calibre machine guns though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sue
I don't quite understand your comment. What do you mean by the 'primacy of the royal family'?

The King is a constitutional monarch, he has little actual power.

I prefer a monarch to a president, because that is how it has been for all of my life, I don't see the need to change things.

The monarch is the monarch by the will of the people, if the day comes when the people prefer a president, so be it.

I would point out that the split is 73% either for or not bothered either way, 27% against. I think the republicans have a way to go.
I know what the split is. That something has majority support doesn't mean it's right or good. People who've been lied to their whole lives often believe outlandish shit.
 
A quick google, and yeh i know it's the Mail, but 14 people have quit from her staff since 2018. That's a pretty hefty turnover.
TBH, we need to get away from a world where people have 'staff'.

Right, that's enough high minded stuff, let's bet back to the dog bowls. :thumbs:
 
I know what the split is. That something has majority support doesn't mean it's right or good. People who've been lied to their whole lives often believe outlandish shit.
Oh well. You are right and the vast majority are wrong. Very perspicacious of you. I dare say that several generations after we are both gone, you may turn out to be right... perhaps. :)
 
Oh well. You are right and the vast majority are wrong. Very perspicacious of you. I dare say that several generations after we are both gone, you may turn out to be right... perhaps. :)
I think the 80% of Russians who approve of Putin are wrong too. Do we have to wait some generations to find out if I'm right there too?
 
Well, I'm not all that keen on companies full stop, but I did say where 'people have staff'.
Sometimes people need things done for them. A home help would be ‘staff’. So would a cleaner, or a cook, or a gardener, or whatever, for someone elderly or disabled. So is a nanny or babysitter for that matter - that’s staff. People need childcare unless they have the finances and desire to be stay at home parents. Why shouldn’t people employ others?
 
Sometimes people need things done for them. A home help would be ‘staff’. So would a cleaner, or a cook, or a gardener, or whatever, for someone elderly or disabled. So is a nanny or babysitter for that matter - that’s staff. People need childcare unless they have the finances and desire to be stay at home parents. Why shouldn’t people employ others?
Or perhaps their pens (fucking pens!) laid out or toothpaste squeezed.
 
Back
Top Bottom