Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

Just pondering .......but "air miles" Andy has been keeping a seemingly remarkably low public profile since 2011ish..
 
He relinquished the role.

Happened to coincide with the coalition's creation of the Sovereign Support Grant, (Osborne giving them even more loot from the asset-bubble proceeds from the "crown" estates). So why would the royals needs to pursue backhanders from other despots?
 
yep Epstien paid 2million over the asking price for Andrews house, he also seperately cleared some of fergies debt
 
yep Epstien paid 2million over the asking price for Andrews house, he also seperately cleared some of fergies debt
This story rings a bell but wasn't the buyer some shady central Asian trust fund based in the Caymens and the house is lying empty rotting?

FUcking nonce...
Depending on where the alleged offence took place, he's a nonce if its Florida but not London.
 
number crunching num
This story rings a bell but wasn't the buyer some shady central Asian trust fund based in the Caymens and the house is lying empty rotting?


Depending on where the alleged offence took place, he's a nonce if its Florida but not London.

baby sitting at mo i see if i can brows it later
 
this sets out some of the case against Andrew, including the "sale of his home in Berkshire to a Kazakh tycoon, Timur Kulibayev, for £15 million: £3 million over the asking price, although there hadn't been a single prospective buyer in three years. It now sits unoccupied and in mounting disrepair, suggesting that the property, curiously, isn't particularly essential to Mr Kulibayev's portfolio."

This is the background to the allegations in the news atm
 
I'd forgotten DSK but was reading up to see why there is too much similarity between Epstein and Berlesconi for comfort.
 
She said she was forced to have sex with him. That's rape anywhere in the world.

Serious question: if person A forces person B to have sex with person C, but C does not know about the forcing, is C the rapist or is A?

Historically, of course, the host sending a slave / floozie / member of his harem to entertain the honoured guest was pretty standard in much of the world.
 
"In the aftermath of the New York arrest other allegations were made. During the case, the journalist Tristane Banon came forward with a claim that Strauss-Kahn had attempted to rape her. In September Banon stated that if there is no criminal prosecution, she would bring a civil case against Strauss-Kahn.[79] According to a report in L'Express Strauss-Kahn admitted to attempting to kiss Banon.[80] In October the French public prosecutors dropped the investigation. They stated that there was a lack of evidence regarding the allegation of attempted rape.[81][82] In March 2012, Strauss-Kahn came under investigation in France over his alleged involvement in a prostitution ring. The allegations relate to his supposed involvement in hiring prostitutes for sex parties at hotels in Lille, Paris and Washington.[83] On 2 October 2012, a French prosecutor announced that they will not continue the investigation of Strauss-Kahn's connection to a possible gang rape in Washington, D.C..[84]


On 26 July 2013, French prosecutors announced that Strauss-Kahn was to stand trial concerning allegations of "aggravated pimping" at the Carlton hotel in Lille.[85] In 2014, the trial was reported to be scheduled for 2015.[45]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominique_Strauss-Kahn#Personal_life
 
Serious question: if person A forces person B to have sex with person C, but C does not know about the forcing, is C the rapist or is A?

Historically, of course, the host sending a slave / floozie / member of his harem to entertain the honoured guest was pretty standard in much of the world.
for which reason anyone in those circles ought to have a clue. Both, I'd say.
 
Serious question: if person A forces person B to have sex with person C, but C does not know about the forcing, is C the rapist or is A?

Historically, of course, the host sending a slave / floozie / member of his harem to entertain the honoured guest was pretty standard in much of the world.
Why do you think rapist need be singular?
 
Historically, of course, the host sending a slave / floozie / member of his harem to entertain the honoured guest was pretty standard in much of the world.

One of those irregular verbs; One hosts, you pimp

Telegraph moonbats see things differently
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/...161/Our-less-than-grand-old-Duke-of-York.html
anyoldiron4 years ago
This Country will need the Monarchy when it comes out of the European Union Jenny. Or perhaps you want your own Country completely destroyed, for the
Localism Bill is set to divide and break up England especially, and yes it started its journey from the EU, along with the 2011 Census form, and the High Speed rail ( The EU's TEN-T)

Is there anyone of those in any national newspaper that has never made a mistake? Stood by a friend that has done some-thing wrong perhaps or have you let them down-walked away?

Our National Newspapers are not be satisfied who they destroy, as long as once they have got their teeth into someone, they never let go, until they get their way.

Britain is no longer respected Jenny, we are the laughing stock of the World. If we remain in the EU, we will not even be a country anymore, just Regions of the EU,
and the people certainly will not be paying any more towards a Government that cannot Govern and they cannot contribute financially to a foreign Government because that would probably be treason. We cannot even afford an Aircraft Carrier-we have to share, and when we share it we have even enough 'planes for it.

There is no one that would want to take over our Country any more, for our own Members of Parliament and Government have been paying foreigners to allow them to give it away. And what are YOU writing about Jenny?
 
Last edited:
for which reason anyone in those circles ought to have a clue. Both, I'd say.
I'd agree, though I suspect Andrew will use this ('I didn't know') in the unlikely event there's a serious investigation into his actions. He really is a vile, vile scumbag.
 
Back
Top Bottom