Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

If I've got this right, the case we're talking about is an action against the US federal prosecutors for letting Epstein off with guilty plea on a minor charge?

The US plea-bargain system does seem pretty bizarre to me. It would seem to make the punishment you get proportional to your chances of beating a charge rather than the severity of your crimes. Ergo someone like Epstein who could presumably hire all the weapons-grade lawyers money can buy gets to take a minor charge because he would've maybe got away with it if charged with something that actually reflected the accusations against him.

e2a: Lots of Epstein's victims appear to have settled out of court. Another good route out of trouble that's not available to less wealthy nonces.
 
If I've got this right, the case we're talking about is an action against the US federal prosecutors for letting Epstein off with guilty plea on a minor charge?

The US plea-bargain system does seem pretty bizarre to me. It would seem to make the punishment you get proportional to your chances of beating a charge rather than the severity of your crimes. Ergo someone like Epstein who could presumably hire all the weapons-grade lawyers money can buy gets to take a minor charge because he would've maybe got away with it if charged with something that actually reflected the accusations against him.


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-celebrity-politics--and-royalty-9954397.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-celebrity-politics--and-royalty-9954397.html

“I’m not a sexual predator, I’m an ‘offender’,” he told the newspaper at the time. “It’s the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel.”
 
If I've got this right, the case we're talking about is an action against the US federal prosecutors for letting Epstein off with guilty plea on a minor charge?

I think it's a civil case for compensation, with the added twist of a side-case calling for release of papers - presumably damaging to Epstein - that would have been in the public domain if Epstein had gone to full criminal trial but are not, yet, because of the plea-bargain.

The US plea-bargain system does seem pretty bizarre to me. It would seem to make the punishment you get proportional to your chances of beating a charge rather than the severity of your crimes. Ergo someone like Epstein who could presumably hire all the weapons-grade lawyers money can buy gets to take a minor charge because he would've maybe got away with it if charged with something that actually reflected the accusations against him.

Yes.

e2a: Lots of Epstein's victims appear to have settled out of court. Another good route out of trouble that's not available to less wealthy nonces.

Indeed. And a good reason for making maximum publicity if you're up against someone who can pay substantial compensation...
 
No matter what evidence may appear, the chances of Andrew getting in any actual trouble must be in the very low zeroes though right? The royal family could never survive having a convicted nonce as one of their number could they?

No, but I bet his father is turning in his grave.;)
 
BBC radio news also leading with, 'PRINCE ANDREW DENIES allegations of noncery'

They're so pathetically transparent in their arse-covering these days :(
 
"Rum characters" for fuck's sake :facepalm:

Epstein isn't a man you'd hesitate to buy a second hand car off, he's a man who should by rights be rotting in jail for considerably longer than the term of his natural life.
 
We must be fair. Remember the 'victim' must always be heard but not in this instance.
 
We must be fair. Remember the 'victim' must always be heard but not in this instance.

Yeah but in this case the victim's claims are utterly baseless because...well beacause the chap being accused bloody well says so. He's a thoroughly respectable sort of chap with the most excellent breeding and whatever he says should be bloody well good enough for anyone.
 
oh, come on. she was being sarcastic.

Was she? She seemed to be to be saying "Oh come on, he meets loads of people, how can he be held responsible for everything they do?" Downplaying the allegations at the time, moving on, going forward etc. Not sarcasm. Unless you're being sarcastic in which case:thumbs:
 
Yeah but in this case the victim's claims are utterly baseless because...well beacause the chap being accused bloody well says so. He's a thoroughly respectable sort of chap with the most excellent breeding and whatever he says should be bloody well good enough for anyone.

Indeed. Quite right Frank.
 
Yeah but in this case the victim's claims are utterly baseless because...well beacause the chap being accused bloody well says so. He's a thoroughly respectable sort of chap with the most excellent breeding and whatever he says should be bloody well good enough for anyone.

Certainly what the BBC is saying.

08b453ea-79c3-4179-9c97-8985110b7ece_zps2fa79efc.png
 
The PM mentioned is probably not a British PM as this article has them as "head of state".

Narrows it down quite a lot, now, I think. Especially with the list posted earlier.

edit: no, it doesn't actually, does it? I don't think the PM is "head of state" in any country? Must be a mistake in this report.
 
I mean some establishment figure denying wrongdoing is hardly news is it? Max Clifford is probably still denying that he did anything wrong, and desperately trying to find a good publicist to help him clear his name...
 
No, shes being sarcastic. Seriously. 'slightly disreputable past', when talking about a convicted nonce, is sarcasm. Especially when said in that tone of voice.

Well then if she was being sarcastic she's a fucking disgrace. Did you listen to the rest of it? The banker man is a convicted child abuser, suspected of procuring and sexually exploiting 40 children for celebrities, politicians, royalty and that business class of cunts for years. 'Slightly disreputable past' isn't sarcasm in any tone of voice. Vested interests all round. Fear maybe but not sarcasm.
 
Back
Top Bottom