gosub
~#
Tbf That would be quite a different prospect at the moment
Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit
- Thread starter editor
- Start date
There's shit all serious evidence of what's what with Prince Charming except a couple of really inconvenient photos that don't say very much as such, just he was there.
However, I believe there's a better than average chance the allegations are true.
However, I believe there's a better than average chance the allegations are true.
What about the testimony of his victim?
dylanredefined
Not a house elf a tiger
Had drinks with a teenager went back to a house and had sex with her.
No evidence that he knew she was doing it against her will. Never appears to be very smart so might think he scored because he is royalty. Or just thinking with his dick.
Proper Tidy
Arsed
Should a man in his 40s have a dick that thinks I want to shag 17 year olds, I dunno
Throbbing Angel
this is no longer a place of honour
Ephebophile?
dylanredefined
Not a house elf a tiger
Legal if distasteful. No clue if it was reasonable to expect it to be consensual or not. Not being a rich bloke or royalty going to rich people night clubs.
brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
Young woman was trafficked and, anyway, if non-consensual = rape.
Proper Tidy
Arsed
I reckon any man in his 40s who gets offered a girl under age of 18 to sleep with by his mate should have some concerns, I don't think there is any getting away from the dubiousness of it.
FridgeMagnet
Administrator
He should definitely go for the "but it's perfectly legal" defence, I reckon that would be highly effective and entirely restore his reputation.
Wilf
Slouching towards Billingham
Random thought: presumably Windsor has royal protection officers with him, when in America or on his visits to nonce island, but certainly in London. Would I be a million miles out thinking that the Met didn't interview them when they decided this didn't need to move to a 'full investigation'?
FridgeMagnet
Administrator
I'm sure the Met performed all due diligence when investigating any possible sex crimes of this immensely wealthy and well-connected person. I am 100% positive that every aspect would have been explored to make sure a member of the royal family was not involved, without fear or favour. Their reputation wold suggest nothing less.
friedaweed
Me and me girl named Jane
Aye and now the main guy who could of grassed on them all has been found...errr..hanging in his cell
Bahnhof Strasse
Met up with Hannah Courtoy a week next Tuesday
Buck House statement:
“It is emphatically denied that the Duke of York had any form of sexual contact or relationship with [Giuffre]. The allegations made are false and without any foundation."
brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
Very Clintonian
emanymton
A cat politely sat on the flaming gardener.
https://nypost.com/2019/09/21/damning-evidence-on-prince-andrew-could-be-in-russian-hands-mi6/
Considering his innocence I can't understand what they are worried about.
Considering his innocence I can't understand what they are worried about.
gosub
~#
Any similarity between HRH Prince Andrew's relationship with convicted and deceased pedophile Jeffery Epstein, and that of the 42nd President of the United States (or the 45th for that matter) is purely coincidental
Prince Vs. unknown that stands to make a fortune for her story.
That doesn't she isn't telling the truth, but truth means fuck all unless she can back it up with more than a photo outside a house. As it happens, I believe her, but cash and power means her chances of getting that over to anyone that matters are limited.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
you obviously don't think much of public opinion.
Depends. In this case it's a matter of weighing up probabilities and I came down to he's a slimy twat and she sounds very much credible.
I have no clue what the majority think of this but I think she's probably telling the truth.
The day I change my thoughts based on public opinion only will be the day I blast my brains out because they won't be worth keeping if I can't think for myself.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
you've made it clear that iyo the public aren't people who matter
In criminal cases, it's the authorities and courts, and there's sod all chance a British Prince will get arrested or even charged.
Hardly matters what public opinion says, it won't happen. As I said above, my brain, such as it is, would be a waste of space if I allowed my thoughts to be decided by the opinions of others.
Cogito, ergo sum.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
I do not think it means what you think it means.
I think therefore I am.
If my thoughts, feelings, and opinions are decided by others, or I'm too scared to voice them because either loss of popularity or fear of violence in whatever form, I can no longer claim independent thought so the one real freedom we have would be lost to me.
If my thoughts, feelings, and opinions are decided by others, or I'm too scared to voice them because either loss of popularity or fear of violence in whatever form, I can no longer claim independent thought so the one real freedom we have would be lost to me.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
So you've given up reading anything which might contain the opinions of others.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Yeah, thought not.
(That's a play on words and the meaning of the phrase you've just misused btw)
Not at all. If I fail to explore the thoughts and opinions others hold I can't truly form my own opinions. I even read far right crap, not because I agree with it, but because I must be able to argue against it or admit my opinions regarding freedom, fairness and equality for all are wrong, or I'm too uneducated to be in the game.
In the case of the naughty prince, I don't believe his version but I still have read his point of view or my opinion would be based purely on political bias, not a weighing up of the stories.
Similar threads
