Old Jokes Home
Q/ What do you get if you cross Bill Clinton and Donald Trump?
A/ Found in your cell, unresponsive
If he has been bumped off and personally I reckoned the odds are in favour not against, it doesn't mean a conspiracy by the establishment whatever that is.Plus, if the establishment wanted to bump anyone off, surely it would be his accusers?
Epstein’s house on East 71st Street, which was said to be the biggest of its kind in the city, was as creepy as its owner. With a stone satyr over the fifteen-foot front door and forty rooms over seven floors, the decor was of the Gothic Quagmire school: according to the FBI agents who raided it at the beginning of July, it contains among other weirdnesses a photo-montage of Epstein standing in a prison surrounded by warders and barbed wire, and a life-sized doll hanging from a chandelier
If he has been bumped off and personally I reckoned the odds are in favour not against, it doesn't mean a conspiracy by the establishment whatever that is.
All of the people he could likely finger are rich and powerful and quite possibly some are involved in organised crime, it's just takes ONE of them to decide that it's better for Epstein to be dead rather than alive. If there is a high turnover of disinterested and poorly trained agency staff getting someone in there to break his neck is probably all too easy.
I dunno. Suicide tends to need hopelessness, helplessness or shame - not common reactions among the sociopathic billionaire class. For people like him, there's always a way out, always a second, third, fourth, fortieth chance. Deals to be done, levers to be pulled. Suicide seems premature, even without the massive eyebrow raise of a prison (deemed secure enough to house the likes of El Chapo) taking its eyes off its most vulnerable prisoner while its manager is under massive global scrutiny. The whole thing is obscure as candles in a hall of mirrors, & probably always will be, but accepting the official line feels too easy to me.
I suspect that is not as difficult as you might think, especially given he has been in there for a few weeks and there has been the chance to make enquiries.Those who wanted rid of him had their work cut out then. I mean you need to organise the failure of the cameras and the ineptness of the guards and have someone in place to do the deed.
I suspect that is not as difficult as you might think, especially given he has been in there for a few weeks and there has been the chance to make enquiries.
And money lots of money makes all sorts of things possible.
How's your wife's medical bills Bert, still crippingly expensive? Here's $50K all you have to do is turn the camera's off, leave the fire door on the latch and make yourself scarce for half an hour. Never mind the big guy in the ill-fitting uniform nothing to see here.
When he was sent down before he was allowed out every day to go to work. So not real time.
This time he was denied bail, he wasn’t stupid, he knew that he was never getting out. Even billionaire sociopaths know when the game’s up. Even under fairly extreme suicide watch people can still off themselves. Why he was not on watch is a question that needs answering, but Occam’s razor says he checked out of his own accord, at the second attempt.
Alternative to Occam's Razor - whatever QAnon says is true is actually false - & they're pushing the 'suicide' line.
If it was after sentencing, on his way to the big house, I'd agree - the game was up. And we're not privy to conversations he's had with his brief etc - maybe he was told that the money was gone & no one was answering the phones. But yep, a big question about being taken off suicide watch, which apparently means being moved to a cell without cameras.
Does it? There are a bunch of massively powerful people (some of the most powerful in the world) who are very relieved that he is now dead. It is an extremely convenient death for them. Maybe it was suicide, we don't know. But I see no reason to jump to a conclusion via Occam's razor that it was.When he was sent down before he was allowed out every day to go to work. So not real time.
This time he was denied bail, he wasn’t stupid, he knew that he was never getting out. Even billionaire sociopaths know when the game’s up. Even under fairly extreme suicide watch people can still off themselves. Why he was not on watch is a question that needs answering, but Occam’s razor says he checked out of his own accord, at the second attempt.
Maybe it was suicide...
That wasn't my point here. You could just as easily say that Occam's razor says he was bumped off, given the power of those he posed a threat to while alive.So what is the point of Occam’s razor if it should only be used selectively?
That wasn't my point here. You could just as easily say that Occam's razor says he was bumped off, given the power of those he posed a threat to while alive.
So what is the point of Occam’s razor if it should only be used selectively?
What assumption, that he posed a threat to some very powerful people? If so, is that a reasonable assumption? If you think it is, then it ought to be factored in - it forms part of the available information on which the decision is being made. Occam's razor doesn't mean 'selectively ignore anything you can't prove'.That adds an assumption.
What assumption, that he posed a threat to some very powerful people? If so, is that a reasonable assumption? If you think it is, then it ought to be factored in - it forms part of the available information on which the decision is being made. Occam's razor doesn't mean 'selectively ignore anything you can't prove'.
I thought it weighs up theories based on the amount of assumptions they contain (reasonable or otherwise).
In the American ‘justice’ system, once you are nicked you get convicted. How bad that conviction is depends on how many others you are prepared to grass. But when it starts with no bail and the most secure facility in the eastern USA you know what the future has in store.
"Channel 4 News can reveal that the Metropolitan Police began a review of "available evidence" in 2015 after receiving a complaint over claims in court papers that a girl was "forced to have sex with Prince Andrew".
Channel 4 News also understands that lawyers for Virginia Roberts independently contacted the Metropolitan Police in 2016.
The Metropolitan Police said it “reviewed the available evidence” and decided that the matter “would not progress to a full investigation”.
It is not clear what constituted the available evidence.
The Met Police has refused to answer detailed questions about the allegations and whether they ever spoke to Epstein, his friend Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew or anyone from the Royal Household.
Prince Andrew has always denied “any form of sexual contact or relationship with Virginia Roberts”.
To be fair they both seem thick as fuck, combined with the inevitable sense of superiority that comes with being called a prince I imagine they take advice from no oneHis brother was good mates with Jimmy Savile and he was mates with Epstein. Do their advisors actually do anything?
To be fair they both seem thick as fuck, combined with the inevitable sense of superiority that comes with being called a prince I imagine they take advice from no one