Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

I’m not a military man and don’t know how titles are awarded, but putting aside the issue of merit/ actions performed whilst serving, I would imagine a main requisite would be to have actually served in the regiment in question? According to the Guardian, he held titles for eight different regiments. Has he served in all of them? :hmm:
The 'honorary' aspect means they can dish them out without actual merit or any formal requirements.
 
I’m not a military man and don’t know how titles are awarded, but putting aside the issue of merit/ actions performed whilst serving, I would imagine a main requisite would be to have actually served in the regiment in question? According to the Guardian, he held titles for eight different regiments. Has he served in all of them? :hmm:
I imagine they're almost certainly honorary ranks. As Colonel-in-Chief of these various groups, he won't have any operational input, just ceremonial and honorific connections. So it's no wonder that members of those groups would rather not have to honour an honorary "superior rank" who's pretty much conclusively being confirmed as a sex abuser.
 
I’m not a military man and don’t know how titles are awarded, but putting aside the issue of merit/ actions performed whilst serving, I would imagine a main requisite would be to have actually served in the regiment in question? According to the Guardian, he held titles for eight different regiments. Has he served in all of them? :hmm:

No, no service needed, they're honorary.
 
Fucks sake. We can't let the nonce stay there, at our expense.
"Ma" - sorry HMQ , always avoided family stress and disputes (say various books etc) ,and would often refer things to the late Duke of Edinburgh.

She must be well displeased to take such action , and so curtly. Even before the traditional leaks to print in the Sunday press. Hope she has an extra martini this evening.
 
Everyone I ever spoke to who was in the Falklands with him utterly detested him.
Why specifically, do you know ? General twattishness or something specific ?

I reckon he's being thrown under the bus for this to save worse things coming out.
 
I reckon he's being thrown under the bus for this to save worse things coming out.


His least worst option is to now ignore it. State that the case has damaged the monarchy enough and he has no intention of letting it overshadow Her Maj’s jubilee year, and then just fuck off. With the roles and titles gone he can do that. He’ll get a default judgement against him, better than a judged judgement. He’ll get damages awarded against him which probably will be enforceable in the U.K., but he’s been making it known for quite a while he has no money or assets.

I would love him to go to court, either in person or via video link, but surely even a dim-witted, moronic imbecile such as HRH Nonceface would see how badly that will pan out. Surely to fuck!
 
Yes, but that's a much wider allegation; there, he's denying having sex with her. But I think he's been quite careful not to deny ever having met her.
He did initially, in the interview. Eventually, he said 'oh, her'.
 
FJAmfgMX0AclXWi
 
Rotherham? For some reason I had it in my head that you were from the middle of Scunthorpe
Well that's somewhere Andrew'd fit right in, between the "s" and the "h".

Meanwhile, won't the toe-sucker have her title dropped too? Don't see how she can stay "Duchess". She won't like having to suffer the humiliation of changing her twitter handle.
 
Back
Top Bottom