Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

You've clearly not been on urban very long, but on this website you are expected to apply some critical thinking and yourself if a source you propose is a truly independent piece of research or merely the ramblings of the biased.

This site does not tolerate shit sources or batshittery on any subject. You have been warned.

Thanks again, in the future I'll stick to the Guardian.
 
On the nonce being called out about not sweating and the pizza express alibi: I remember seeing this in the interview and thinking that whilst both seemed 'unlikely', they must be things he could get someone to back up or else he wouldn't have said them. There were rumours that 'the palace' and maybe some of his own advisers had warned against the interview. Even with that in mind it just seemed common sense that he wouldn't have put those 2 definite claims and pieces of evidence forward if they were going to crumble when challenged. You'd have thought he'd at least have a bent doctor and royal protection officers lined up to back his nonsense (nonce sense, naturally).

Did we ever get the final word on his interview preparation? Were the pizza express and non-sweat lies ever 'signed off' by a lawyer or one of his team? If not, the startling conclusion is that he was flying solo and, with all those professional liars available, he just decided to fashion his own lies? :confused: Well, that went well..
It was reported that after the interview he took Maitlis on a tour of the Palace.Recall thinking at the time that he clearly had little idea of the depth of the shit he was in.
 
There's typos and then there's making a typo that looks like the BBC is cementing it's establishment position and funding stream.
If it's down to a cock-up or a conspiracy theory, I was explaining how a cock-up is more likely, in that's it's much more likely that someone simply failed to pick up on the urgent need to change one word and update a script/article. If a script had been read before, if an article had been printed previously, or bits of an earlier script or article rehashed, it could've easily slipped through the net.

But what would I know? I mean, I've only done producer shifts for BBC television and radio news output, I've only worked as a copy editor/writer, assistant producer, producer and senior journalist in other television and radio newsrooms and live studios, and online and print operations.
 
Which conditions determine whether or not Occam’s razor applies?
i dunno.
but surely it's so much more likely that a man facing decades in prison for crimes that would entail his solitary confinement until he died of natural causes, would rationally take his own life? West and Shipman did the same.
 
Back
Top Bottom