Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Political polling

Trouble with articles like that is that they don't consider that greens might be more likely to vote labour if it was a close fight to remove a tory, so it won't be 5 or 7% across the board. It might help the tories take some libdem seats, since that's where most of the green support has come from.
 
Trouble with articles like that is that they don't consider that greens might be more likely to vote labour if it was a close fight to remove a tory, so it won't be 5 or 7% across the board. It might help the tories take some libdem seats, since that's where most of the green support has come from.


Very fair point.

Monbiot, also in the Guardian, has not long ago urged people to vote Green irrespective of polls, and IMO he's pretty ignorant of the relevant psephology as well.

Tactical voting in particular seats is so often dismissed. In my view unforgivably, if you risk ending up with a Tory out and out majority :hmm:
 
Ashcroft volatility:

Latest Ashcroft poll (20 - 22 Feb):
LAB - 36% (+5)
CON - 32% (+2)
UKIP - 11% (-5)
GRN - 8% (-)
LDEM - 7% (-2)

For england only:
LAB 38
CON 32
UKIP 13
GRN 8
LD 6

That guaranteed lab maj territory.

The share of the others starting to drop - still historically high though.
 
Ashcroft volatility:

Latest Ashcroft poll (20 - 22 Feb):
LAB - 36% (+5)
CON - 32% (+2)
UKIP - 11% (-5)
GRN - 8% (-)
LDEM - 7% (-2)

For england only:
LAB 38
CON 32
UKIP 13
GRN 8
LD 6

That guaranteed lab maj territory.

The share of the others starting to drop - still historically high though.
Albeit Lord Volatile's polling, those Eng only numbers will terrify the vermin.
 
Very fair point.

Monbiot, also in the Guardian, has not long ago urged people to vote Green irrespective of polls, and IMO he's pretty ignorant of the relevant psephology as well.

Tactical voting in particular seats is so often dismissed. In my view unforgivably, if you risk ending up with a Tory out and out majority :hmm:

I wonder how much the rise of constituency polling is going to change tactical voting. Before it was a pretty solid way of perpetuating the status quo, because it would usually make most sense to vote for whoever finished first and second in the last election. Now you've got constituencies like Great Grimsby where Labour and UKIP can argue on the basis of Ashcroft's polling that the choice is really between them... (rather than being a Con-Lab marginal with UKIP nowhere)
 
I wonder how much the rise of constituency polling is going to change tactical voting. Before it was a pretty solid way of perpetuating the status quo, because it would usually make most sense to vote for whoever finished first and second in the last election. Now you've got constituencies like Great Grimsby where Labour and UKIP can argue on the basis of Ashcroft's polling that the choice is really between them...
Btw Constituency polling counts towards the allotted amount each candidate can spend on their campaign - so they're going to dry up.
 
How does that work? Like if Ashcroft does a poll in Great Grimsby does the cost go on the Tory candidate's allotted amount?
Not sure, the stuff the lib-dems paid for and have been paying for does count - on what basis i'm not sure. A divided amount (national vs seats) is the the only way i can think of. But all panicky candidates paying for individual ones from now on - it counts and comes off your leaflet budget
 
Not sure, the stuff the lib-dems paid for and have been paying for does count - on what basis i'm not sure. A divided amount (national vs seats) is the the only way i can think of.
ah I get you. Either way, in the 130-150 seats Ashcroft has already done the figures will go on leaflets, work their way into local canvassing etc and might have an impact...
 
Will to have to look at the Ashcroft tabs in detail, but I'm beginning to wonder if the shedding of UKIP support might end up acting as a second 'crutch' for Lab. Their former Lab support has certainly been a more recent phenomena so, possibly less sticky...particularly at a time when the tory media are engaged in such a dirty war against the 'kippers. Maybe Crosby's effort will drive a Lab surge?:D
 
Will to have to look at the Ashcroft tabs in detail, but I'm beginning to wonder if the shedding of UKIP support might end up acting as a second 'crutch' for Lab. Their former Lab support has certainly been a more recent phenomena so, possibly less sticky...particularly at a time when the tory media are engaged in such a dirty war against the 'kippers. Maybe Crosby's effort will drive a Lab surge?:D

Unfortunately I suspect those right-wing tories who thought Cameron was fucked anyway so they might as well vote moonbat are now viewing a situation whereby the vermin might pull it off (via coalition rather than overall) and one where Miliband isn't a certainty, and so they're less likely to throw their vote away in protest at Cameron's socially liberal nonsense and instead stick with the team. On the other hand, Labour supporters who migrated to the kippers aren't really being given any reason to go back.
 
Tactical voting in particular seats is so often dismissed. In my view unforgivably, if you risk ending up with a Tory out and out majority :hmm:
What do you make of the Scottish Labour folks recommending people vote tactically for the Tories in seats Labour can't win to keep the SNP out? Does that not risk ending up with a Tory majority?

Real socialists vote Tory

 
What do you make of the Scottish Labour folks recommending people vote tactically for the Tories in seats Labour can't win to keep the SNP out? Does that not risk ending up with a Tory majority?

Real socialists vote Tory


I can see that going down well... :confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom