Not really disagreeing with you. In the absence of any bigger political project by Labour/Corbyn/Momentum, fully committing the party would be a tactical mistake. It's the absence of that wider project that's the problem...They don't really have any choice I don't think - full engagement with leave or remain would destroy them.
(also, their new party political broadcast is a slammer)
Interesting You give poll for the Euros in London.
Chuk on 17%
Greens, LibDems on 10% only 1% behind the Tories.
Not sure it would - London is in the south east region, they'd need to replicate these numbers right across the region to get a seat (labour got one on 14% last time)That would give the chuks a seat.
Nah, they are separate. It would give Gavin Esler a seat as the lead London candidate.Not sure it would - London is in the south east region, they'd need to replicate these numbers right across the region to get a seat (labour got one on 14% last time)
London is actually a discrete European constituency returning 8 MEPs, quite separate from the South East's 10.Not sure it would - London is in the south east region, they'd need to replicate these numbers right across the region to get a seat (labour got one on 14% last time)
Yep; D'Hondt, innit?The formula was mentioned upthread I think, but it's not fully proportional. It's something like a series of 'rounds' which allocate seats to the highest vote rather than re-allocating losing candidate's votes. Lab may get 2 or 3 seats, brexit and chuks 2? Libdems or Greens may well miss out on those figures.
Yep. In my shaky maths, I presume they have to do it like that because it's a party list system. Other PR systems require there to be individual votes for individual candidates.
Yep, does not effect the most proportional outcome, but does work to give whole seat totals with no fractions etc. and favoured by the Eurocrats as it slightly privileges big parties & groupings...keeping out the riff raff.Yep. In my shaky maths, I presume they have to do it like that because it's a party list system. Other PR systems require there to be individual votes for individual candidates.
Similar to those more straightforward PR systems in the past which had a minimum 'threshold', to stop 'extremists' getting in.Yep, does not effect the most proportional outcome, but does work to give whole seat totals with no fractions etc. and favoured by the Eurocrats as it slightly privileges big parties & groupings...keeping out the riff raff.
Yeah, regardless of what you think about Labour's politics, they've done a really good job on political broadcasts/adverts for a while now.It's good line drawing politics that vid.
(Obv usual stuff applies blah blah)
Interesting You give poll for the Euros in London.
Chuk on 17%
Greens, LibDems on 10% only 1% behind the Tories.
Nah, the Australian senate election is STV where you can still vote for a partyYep. In my shaky maths, I presume they have to do it like that because it's a party list system. Other PR systems require there to be individual votes for individual candidates.
My hurried dash to Wikipedia suggests they now have a system where you can vote by either party or candidate - and also that none of their systems work that well. Must work though*, not read it properly.Nah, the Australian senate election is STV where you can still vote for a party
TBF that's pretty accurate on all counts. But STV party vote is (approximately) proportional.My hurried dash to Wikipedia suggests they now have a system where you can vote by either party or candidate - and also that none of their systems work that well. Australian Senate - Wikipedia
(also, their new party political broadcast is a slammer)