Well, I agree with that, which is pretty much my/a reply to your earlier post.
If you take resources as simply people and money there have certainly been enough to make a difference and to do some organising. Hundreds of thousands came in as supporters/members and little was done to create something different with/through them (and now many have left). But there's also your point about roots. Not just these new members, but the membership more generally are more middle class. But I suppose my point was really about the still dominant Labourism and what Corbyn
thinks of as an engaged working class party. That still seems to be 'join a union, join the labour party, win elections and do A-B marches'. A party where the working class are invited to come to Labour, not the other way round.
Edit: when I've made similar points to the underlined on here before, Labour members have reminded me it's been hard to shift the old bureaucracy and lots of time gets spent just ticking the machine over. I accept all of that. Same time, as
redsquirrel says, there doesn't seem to be
acceptance on the Labour left of the need to build something different, something beyond labourism. Equally, if you want to go out and resist evictions or closures, just get on and do it (even if, that would often be closures undertaken by your own councillors). Get the issue right, get the politics right and use
that to change the structures/party.