Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Political polling

Yes, but four days after the bombing, the DM, Sun, etc won't be looking for nuance, Crosby and they will slaughter him, already the Maquis are having a go at him across the media, briefing against him, stick to the domestic agenda JC, we can win then.
Newsnight have resorted to Charles Clark to declare that Corbyn is "quite simply wrong".
 
The cynical and pragmatic campaigners for Labour should go hard on cuts to police numbers and the dementia tax.

The latter will continue to piss off those it first pissed off, and the former will catch those who care about security and usually turn to the tories to be hard on that sort of thing.

Interesting times, indeed.

A person on the internet just posted this in response:

giphy.gif
 
Newsnight have resorted to Charles Clark to declare that Corbyn is "quite simply wrong".
about anything in particular or just in general? The standard today quoted Glenda Jackson dissing Corbyn and praising May for being a grown-up. drip drip drip...
 
Corbyn is to put the events in Manchester at the heart of a speech tomorrow, and link it in some way to foreign policy, just when the polls are going his way, he just can't help himself.

On Newsnight now,

Guardian is now reporting May is going to push a new Prevent style agenda.
Are you seriously suggesting that after a major international incident, something that he is bound to the questioned on, something that the Tories will use to their advantage that his first post-incident speech should be about something else?

Utter fucking madness, he'd be crucified. Yes it probably would be to Labour's advantage if the rest of the campaign was focused on domestic stuff but they can't simply bury their head in the ground and pretend this week didn't happen. They might screw it up (though like ItWillNeverWorks say's I don't necessarily think an anti-Trump/anti-Saudi message would play badly) but knowing their weakness on this issue and how the Tories will attack them they have to address the issue.

The best thing for them is to get this over and then move the campaign back to domestic stuff for the last week/week and a half.
 
The cynical and pragmatic campaigners for Labour should go hard on cuts to police numbers and the dementia tax.
purely policy based campigning lets her off the hook. She's chosen her campaign slogan carefully, let it haunt her. I got phone polled by Populus today, one of the questions was "which leader can provide strong and stable government?" Oh, how I laughed, and got the interviewer to crack up too. She is so vulnerable to people repeating strong and stable / weak and wobbly.

She's not fit to be prime minister, she's buckled under pressure.

say it loud, say it often.
 
purely policy based campigning lets her off the hook. She's chosen her campaign slogan carefully, let it haunt her. I got phone polled by Populus today, one of the questions was "which leader can provide strong and stable government?" Oh, how I laughed, and got the interviewer to crack up too. She is so vulnerable to people repeating strong and stable / weak and wobbly.

She's not fit to be prime minister, she's buckled under pressure.

say it loud, say it often.

Absolutely. I'm sure we can all agree I'm doing my part this evening by using the bbcqt hashtag to repeatedly tell everyone she's not strong and stable but weak and dangerous (focusing on police cuts). I'm certain I'll personally swing at least another couple of points for labour :D
 
about anything in particular or just in general? The standard today quoted Glenda Jackson dissing Corbyn and praising May for being a grown-up. drip drip drip...
Pretty much everything, I guess...but specifically to draw any correlation between UK foreign policy and U.K. Based terrorism.
 
So that means you have to put Labour before labour, and give up any politics beyond making sure the LP gets into power?

Again a prefect example of the reason why people should not join the LP.
 
In the latest Yougov poll taking all responses, labour are only 2% behind the tories on 30% to 32%, with 15% don't knows, and of those don't knows 18% are now most likely to vote labour vs 16% for Tory, whereas last week more were likely to vote Tory than Labour.

There's also a firming up of the Labour vote's determination to vote, with 0% of their voters saying their likelihood to vote is between 0-4, vs 3% of the Tory vote.

Also the under 25s vote is really firming up, now with 63% definitely planning to vote, compared to 55% in the 25 to 49 age range.

Only one poll, but it certainly looks a hell of a lot better than a couple of weeks back, and the momentum definitely seems to be with Labour.
 
So that means you have to put Labour before labour, and give up any politics beyond making sure the LP gets into power?

Again a prefect example of the reason why people should not join the LP.
do you really fear a Labour government more than a tory one?
 
it's a fair question, why not answer it. you've launched an attack on support for the LP midway through a GE campaign.
 
I've done no such thing. I've criticised putting the Labour party before the working class.

You're as dishonest here as you were about the Glaberman quote.
 
The monumentally cynical, off the scale thing for labour to do would be to wheel out Andy Burnham alongside Corbyn, in another week or so. Hope they don't, don't think they will, don't think either Corbyn or Burnham would do it. But it just sits there as a kind of horror scenario. Please don't.
 
The monumentally cynical, off the scale thing for labour to do would be to wheel out Andy Burnham alongside Corbyn, in another week or so. Hope they don't, don't think they will, don't think either Corbyn or Burnham would do it. But it just sits there as a kind of horror scenario. Please don't.

I didn't watch question time but looking at twitter it sounds like Burnham said that tired old line about the Muslim community needing to do more. From what I understand, the bomber was reported on 5 different occasions and no action was taken, so it seems ridiculous not to point that out all things considered.
 
I've done no such thing. I've criticised putting the Labour party before the working class.

You're as dishonest here as you were about the Glaberman quote.
answer the question, preferably without personal insults. Which potential future government do you fear most, Labour or Conservative?
 
Is that all you've got? Pathetic when did you stop hitting your wife bollocks. No actual attempt to deal with the political point I made.

How about you answer a question, are you a member of the LP?
 
I didn't watch question time but looking at twitter it sounds like Burnham said that tired old line about the Muslim community needing to do more. From what I understand, the bomber was reported on 5 different occasions and no action was taken, so it seems ridiculous not to point that out all things considered.
Maybe the political class weren't so keen for folk to dwell on the question of why nothing was done with the intel.
 
Is that all you've got? Pathetic when did you stop hitting your wife bollocks. No actual attempt to deal with the political point I made.

How about you answer a question, are you a member of the LP?
what, you're not prepared to answer a straight question? It's pretty simple you know, which government do you fear least?

No.
 
I didn't watch question time but looking at twitter it sounds like Burnham said that tired old line about the Muslim community needing to do more. From what I understand, the bomber was reported on 5 different occasions and no action was taken, so it seems ridiculous not to point that out all things considered.
Just watching on catch-up and a Muslim woman in the audience did make the point that this bomber was reported.
 
I didn't watch question time but looking at twitter it sounds like Burnham said that tired old line about the Muslim community needing to do more. From what I understand, the bomber was reported on 5 different occasions and no action was taken, so it seems ridiculous not to point that out all things considered.
That's both a genuine and equally predictable line. But I just hope that however Corbyn manages to push this election he keeps his principles in tact. I don't actually agree with a good few of his principles or his overall belief in the British state, but most of all I hope he resists temptation. There's actually scope for a bit of Corbynising at the moment - and that might be behind the 5% gap, a sense that his quieter clichés are better than May's squawkish clichés. But then thinking about how any 'message' plays out for votes is a bit yuky.
 
From Reddit :D

Corbyn will never run

Corbyn will never get elected by the Labour members

Corbyn will never find any frontbenchers

Corbyn will never hold on to power

"Haha, Corbyn"

Corbyn will never win re-election

Corbyn will never win re-election with an increased majority

Corbyn will never bring the party out of debt

Corbyn will never sing the national anthem

"Bahaha"

Corbyn will never come back from 25%

Corbyn will never prevent the LibDems from becoming the new opposition

Corbyn will never support Article 50

Corbyn will never support a GE in 2017

"Ahah.. ha.."

Corbyn will never support Trident

Corbyn will never support hard Brexit

Corbyn will never abolish tuition fees

Corbyn will never fully cost his manifesto

"C-Corbyn?"

Corbyn will never breach 30%

Corbyn will never win over the working class

Corbyn will never win over Liberals

Corbyn will never win over Conservatives

"CORBYN NO"

Corbyn will never win over lost UKIP voters

Corbyn will never beat May in net approval

Corbyn will never gain after Manchester

Corbyn will never rally the North

Corbyn will never hit 38%

You are here

Corbyn will never breach 40%

Corbyn will never force May to debate

Corbyn will never breach 50%

Corbyn will never win the general election

Corbyn will never be PM

"AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH"

Corbyn will never reverse tax and spending cuts

Corbyn will never establish a National Education Service

Corbyn will never renationalise the rails without compensation

Corbyn will never federalise the UK

Corbyn will never provide free heating and solve the ageing population by setting all the old people on fire

Corbyn will never get a good Brexit deal

Corbyn will never dismantle the EU

Corbyn will never cement the channel tunnel

Corbyn will never abolish the monarchy

Corbyn will never declare himself Chairman head of state

Corbyn will never send Dianne Abbott to the glue factory

Corbyn will never detach the UK from the sea bed and turn this island into a giant battleship

Corbyn will never use said battleship to spread the revolution to other countries

Corbyn will never "nationalise" Europe

Corbyn will never "nationalise" Russia in the winter

Corbyn will never "nationalise" the USA and China

Corbyn will never "nationalise" outer space

Corbyn will never make anime real
 
Back
Top Bottom