butchersapron
Bring back hanging
YouGov:
LAB 39%
CON, 32%
UKIP 11%
LD 9%
LAB 39%
CON, 32%
UKIP 11%
LD 9%
Labour won't need to form a coalition with anybody, with poll ratings like that.Labour/UKIP coalition? I jest of course.
It's interesting to see that the polls have settled into the normal pattern, with Labour back in the 38-40 range they've been in most of the last few years, and the Tories on about 30-32. The Tories have been in damage limitation mode quite a lot, telling themselves the economy is all magically sorted and the polls are creeping their way. This graph has been tweeted out a few times by leading Tories in what likes like some damage limitation.
Which is all very reassuring until you realise it's only one polling company (YouGov) and it's only 6 months. Expand that graph out to look at the long-term trend over you 2 years and you would get a graph that painted a much different picture. They're starting to resemble the Republicans a little bit I think, convinced the booming British economy is going save them even if the polls don't have much evidence for it.
What statistical numpty stuck a linear trend through that graph? Not to mention that a single value of r-squared in isolation is basically meaningless, and that even if it did have meaning, a value of 0.49 would generally be considered to be a poor fit.
We've had that before. In response, I pointed out that the trend line doesn't fit the data, and only a moron would attempt to put a linear trend through it anyway, and that I could do a better job in MS Paint, which I then did:It's interesting to see that the polls have settled into the normal pattern, with Labour back in the 38-40 range they've been in most of the last few years, and the Tories on about 30-32. The Tories have been in damage limitation mode quite a lot, telling themselves the economy is all magically sorted and the polls are creeping their way. This graph has been tweeted out a few times by leading Tories in what likes like some damage limitation.
That isn’t to say the election is in the bag .Events, as ever, may intervene
They actually employ the idiot that came up with that graph? Wow.Wallace actually says in that piece:
This is someone they employ to analyse this stuff.
Wallace actually says in that piece:
This is someone they employ to analyse this stuff.
That yellow line is pretty funny. Nailed on 10% for three years. That is not 'inevitable mid term blues' that is political death. Why are the lib dems so sanguine about it?
They were always there, but they previously were propping up the Tories.On the other hand that purple line is very very unfunny indeed. It might (will) help fuck the Tories, for which hallelujah, but that's a fuck of a lot of frothing hate-filled right wing loons....
They were always there, but they previously were propping up the Tories.
On the other hand that purple line is very very unfunny indeed. It might (will) help fuck the Tories, for which hallelujah, but that's a fuck of a lot of frothing hate-filled right wing loons....
no it isn't. it's a lot of people saying they'll vote ukip.On the other hand that purple line is very very unfunny indeed. It might (will) help fuck the Tories, for which hallelujah, but that's a fuck of a lot of frothing hate-filled right wing loons....
no it isn't. it's a lot of people saying they'll vote ukip.
The existence of a frothing far-right party helps the tories look like a saner option, that's a bit of a concern (in that they can use this as justification for doing some pretty nasty stuff by there being someone on the scene offering to be that little bit nastier - something which Labour will also do).
people chat all sorts of shit. they probably aren't as thick as you have 'em pegged though.
ie. a guess, and piss-poor one at that.
Perfectly sound reasoning. He's arbitrarily picked three electoral phenomena that would happen to lead to a Tory victory and applied them to the current polls.