Athos
Well-Known Member
Not a popular one by the look of it.
But it could be, eh?
Not a popular one by the look of it.
yupAye - us 'social chauvanists' took our que from our cdes n NI - initially drawn from members of the civil rights movement in Derry in particular. Despite, the collapse of your 'anti-imperialist' struggle, socialists still have a base in NI - playing a key role in the recent Vitreon occupation in Belfast for instance.
Thing is, I can fully understand those lads queueing up to sign up to the RA in the wake of the bloody sunday murders - i respect their commitment, if i had come from those communities i would have probably done the same thing - its the organisation's cheerleaders here in 'blighty' i find harder to respect.
Weirdly most working people in NI don't want a return to your 'anti-imperialist' war. Why do you think that is?
Absolutely No.
I support the nationalist community's right to defend their homes from loyalist pogroms. The British army arrived to defend the status-quo of a loyalist state and to crush the nationalist rebellion in the bogside.
This is my last on this too ok. The working class were divided. But that ideological division wasn't equal.One side (the loyalists) were wedded to a reactionary ideology ie the maintainance of the loyalist state.The other (nationalist) section of the working class held an anti imperialist ideology ie a united Ireland. Your equating of the two sides as equally reactionary just pandered to loyalist and pro British ideology. This was a betrayal of the nationalist working class and put you on the wrong side in a war of national liberation.
yes surely he supports North Korea's brave anti imperialist stance on behalf of the peace loving peoples of KoreaDare we ask him if he supports the workers bomb?
so by supportting nationalism on one side you break the others from imperialism?? don't talk crap! that is utter lack of logic ..Absolutely No.
I support the nationalist community's right to defend their homes from loyalist pogroms. The British army arrived to defend the status-quo of a loyalist state and to crush the nationalist rebellion in the bogside.
This is my last on this too ok. The working class were divided. But that ideological division wasn't equal.One side (the loyalists) were wedded to a reactionary ideology ie the maintenance of the loyalist state.
The other (nationalist) section of the working class held an anti imperialist ideology ie a united Ireland. Your equating of the two sides as equally reactionary just pandered to loyalist and pro British chauvanism. This was a betrayal of the nationalist working class and put you on the wrong side in a war of national liberation.
yes surely he supports North Korea's brave anti imperialist stance on behalf of the peace loving peoples of Korea
No, but I think Iran has the right to a bomb as long as Israel has it.
The apparent 'crimes' of Militant are something we will have to limp along with until the revolution I'm guessing...
the wrong side in a war of national liberation.
^I'll repeat the question. I'm not even bothering to ask about your personal involvement
You accuse the SP of being 'spineless' and pandering to nationalism.
Yet you do fuck all while the SP turn one dispute after another around.
Its all 'talking the talk' when it comes to your version of 'challenging' - for all the flag-burning rhetoric (the actual 'internet hardman' reality you have unsurprising ducked as an issue....) while you come out with baseless and genuinely 'spineless' lies about those who actually get their hands dirty.
Others get on with the real job of genuinely challenging backward attitudes without alienating. Idiots like you? - sit behind your computer screens 'talking the talk' of anti-racism and lieing through your cynical teeth.
And that sums you up - utterly dishonest, poisonous and cynical - a do nothing hypocrite and 'internet hardman'
I can understand and sympathise with those who are genuinely concerned and angry that 'not enough' is being one while folk are still dying in iraq, afganistan etc, folk are still being jailed and victimised across the world. But your tears, they are completely crocodile. Completely cynical.
so by supportting nationalism on one side you break the others from imperialism?? don't talk crap! that is utter lack of logic ..
I know first-hand that no criticism of the nationalist element of the strike was criticised or discussed in the paper, which even triumphalised the process as representing "Shades of the miners' strike".
I take it that was said with your tongue very firmly in your cheek!dennis why can you not be honest and admit that you are a yellow bellyed running dog of imperialism? it is clear that there is no organisation that acts more as a cheerleader for British imperialism within the working class than MT/SP! It is YOUR actions that have condemned the NI catholic working class to the continued hell of the imperialist oppression .. it is YOUR actions that stopped Argentina defeating British imperialism and freeing the enslaved Malvinas! It is your actions that sees poles firebombed from their homes and driven from their construction jobs! It is your actions that force the likes of Bakri to believe that the only solution for the Brotish working class is Sharia and Jihad. Deal with it! I bet you sleep with a Butchers Apron on top of you!
I take it that was said with your tongue very firmly in your cheek!
Dare we ask him if he supports the workers bomb?
Unfortunately militant supported Thatchers war and called it a "war against fascism"
With friends like this the oppressed of the world don't need enemies
dennis why can you not be honest and admit that you are a yellow bellyed running dog of imperialism?
All very well and good, but your reading of history is slightly inaccurate. When the British army were sent in to Northern Ireland their remit wasn't to defend the status quo of the Loyalist state.Absolutely No.
I support the nationalist community's right to defend their homes from loyalist pogroms. The British army arrived to defend the status-quo of a loyalist state and to crush the nationalist rebellion in the bogside.
More binary simplicity leading to more inaccuracy.This is my last on this too ok. The working class were divided. But that ideological division wasn't equal.One side (the loyalists) were wedded to a reactionary ideology ie the maintenance of the loyalist state.
The other (nationalist) section of the working class held an anti imperialist ideology ie a united Ireland. Your equating of the two sides as equally reactionary just pandered to loyalist and pro British chauvanism. This was a betrayal of the nationalist working class and put you on the wrong side in a war of national liberation.
Irony isn't a strong point either.Unfortunately militant supported Thatchers war and called it a "war against fascism"
With friends like this the oppressed of the world don't need enemies
dennis why can you not be honest and admit that you are a yellow bellyed running dog of imperialism? it is clear that there is no organisation that acts more as a cheerleader for British imperialism within the working class than MT/SP! It is YOUR actions that have condemned the NI catholic working class to the continued hell of the imperialist oppression .. it is YOUR actions that stopped Argentina defeating British imperialism and freeing the enslaved Malvinas! It is your actions that sees poles firebombed from their homes and driven from their construction jobs! It is your actions that force the likes of Bakri to believe that the only solution for the Brotish working class is Sharia and Jihad. Deal with it! I bet you sleep with a Butchers Apron on top of you!
I take it that was said with your tongue very firmly in your cheek!
Unfortunately militant supported Thatchers war and called it a "war against fascism"
With friends like this the oppressed of the world don't need enemies
don't talk out of your arse idiot
google is your friend if you want to do slander:
http://www.socialismtoday.org/108/falklands.html
And no Miltant cannot seriously be held responsible for the 1926 crash, the fall of rome etc etc etc
We had long discussions with the chief trotskyist group in Argentina not long after the end of the War (we also had - and still have - our own group in Argentina). We agreed to disagree on longer term consolidation of our respective international groupings but still work together after friendly discussions. They were fully aware of our position on the Falklands/Malvinas War. The entrance to the parties hq includes a long list on the wall - a huge carved stone tablet - of those worker and party activists tortured, murdered and disappeared by the very military junta you demanded should be cheerled. it runs into hundreds - this trotskyist grouping are very proud of their comrades - proud of the simple fact that very few talked, they preferred death to being a traitor to the working class.
For you its easy.
You see I can do rhetoric too...
The difference being - for these worker activists - that it really meant something
Oh, and just to rub it in - the guy who represented the CWI in those discussions is a well-known (in latin america) gay activist. How about 'redundancy notices - you haven't done that one yet... ?
You forgot to mention him wanking himself off over a picture of Thatcher
Irony isn't a strong point either.
That squinty thatcher eye followed me across europe. I lived for a while with a lass in germany - she couldn't help having a thatcher eye - it was doomed from the start, sadly
i digress...
you lived in Germany!!