Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Papers, please - covid passport bollocks

its partly because of real cases like this

I don't think the handful of tragic issues like the above in the huge sea of benefits from vaccination, is the reason vaccinating kids is a big discussion point. It's specifically pushed by anti-vaxxers because protecting our children is so emotive.
 
I don't think the handful of tragic issues like the above in the huge sea of benefits from vaccination, is the reason vaccinating kids is a big discussion point. It's specifically pushed by anti-vaxxers because protecting our children is so emotive.
Yep. Antivax arseholes will cling to anything they can find in order to keep their cult - and it is a cult - going.
 
I don't think the handful of tragic issues like the above in the huge sea of benefits from vaccination, is the reason vaccinating kids is a big discussion point. It's specifically pushed by anti-vaxxers because protecting our children is so emotive.
im not arguing but making the point that because there are real world cases protective parents panic, and that panic spreads

anyway this is a derail
 
I don’t think ska is wrong to make the point they made. None of loon stuff happens in a vaccuum. It
feeds off real tragedy injustice and fear; as well as being actively promoted by the shittiest people on the planet for the shittiest of purposes. See how antisemitism was being pushed to disabled people/those under th heel of the DWP during the Corbyn years. Or how Scientology target families bereaved by psychiatric malpractice

dead eyed scum eyeing up easy targets. More of it than we like to think
 
Black Hebrew Israelites you see (well, used to see) in central and south london. funny how they so often come across as people you’d meet in an acute mental health ward.
 
Going on leave from the maudsley was always fun. Had someone from the ‘Islamic Centre in london’ (or some such) try to get me to convert and come off my meds (no suicide in Saudi Arabia you see) - in between explaining to me how 9/11 was a set up.
 
Anyway, I'm not going to the pub until I can actually just go to the pub.

I do honestly respect your principled stand, but in actual practice, my factor of "can't fucking wait for a class pub with an excellent choice of real-quality draught pints on offer", just could lead to compromises ..... ;) :oops:

For instance ....

No apps, no sign in sheet, no masks, no table service, just a normal drink in a normal pub

Definitions of 'normality' may end up being flexible! :p

. If that takes another year I'll wait.

Fuck that shit, man! :mad: :D

;)
 
Wish I'd been in Portugal last night, even though the wrong team won. Watching Porto playing, in Porto, was always fun. (Except for the time I went into a Benfica bar to watch Benfica v Porto wearing a Porto scarf. Porto won 5-2, I celebrated quietly)
I went out at tea time for a couple of beers and a plate of snails but came home to watch the Chelsea Porto game. The outside TV in the bar is too small. Weird how despite the low levels of covid in both Portugal and the UK both legs are being played in Seville due to no direct flights.
 
Dunno if there's already a thread it's being discussed on, but what do people make of this?

The government must take action against care home employers refusing to employ staff hesitant about having the Covid vaccine, or intimidating others into having the injection by linking it to pay and employment, says UNISON today (Friday).
If the vaccine programme is to work properly and maximum take-up across the social care secured, individuals should be encouraged, not intimidated, into receiving a jab, the union says.
UNISON has written to care minister Helen Whately calling for the government to intervene. It follows the announcement that Barchester Healthcare will not hire workers who refuse the vaccine, and will restrict promotions, bonuses and other rewards only to those who have had the injection. A small number of other companies are understood to be considering following suit.
This heavy-handed approach is exactly the opposite of what’s needed to encourage the maximum number of care workers to come forward for the vaccine, says UNISON. It is urging all care companies to adopt a similar approach to that being used across the NHS.
Like, I think people should get the vaccine and refusing to get it is bad, but I also reckon I'm on the union's side here. Would anyone agree with what Barchester Healthcare's doing?
 
Dunno if there's already a thread it's being discussed on, but what do people make of this?


Like, I think people should get the vaccine and refusing to get it is bad, but I also reckon I'm on the union's side here. Would anyone agree with what Barchester Healthcare's doing?
This has come up before. My opinion on it is pretty much unchanged. I would far rather persuasion than coercion, but I don't think it is unreasonable for those who depend on carers to expect those carers to be vaccinated. They are one of the most vulnerable groups in society and deserve protection.
 
Dunno if there's already a thread it's being discussed on, but what do people make of this?


Like, I think people should get the vaccine and refusing to get it is bad, but I also reckon I'm on the union's side here. Would anyone agree with what Barchester Healthcare's doing?

I have to tell the agency staff I train that they may be offered less work if they don't get the vaccine. Not because of our policies but because clients are refusing agency staff who haven't been done. This is legal enough (companies get to choose what agency staff they have on their premises) but I suspect the companies doing this may ultimately fall foul of equality legislation, specifically regarding disability (people who can't have the vaccine because of health complaints)

I don't like it much, the flu vaccine for exanple is not mandatory (and flu is also a killer) but I certainly have no sympathy with vaccine refusniks who just don't wanna.

However I feel from the companies' perspective, this is less about vulnerable clients than with insurance premiums and optics. Otherwise, why make covid jabs mandatory but not flu?
 
I have to tell the agency staff I train that they may be offered less work if they don't get the vaccine. Not because of our policies but because clients are refusing agency staff who haven't been done. This is legal enough (companies get to choose what agency staff they have on their premises) but I suspect the companies doing this may ultimately fall foul of equality legislation, specifically regarding disability (people who can't have the vaccine because of health complaints)

I don't like it much, the flu vaccine for exanple is not mandatory (and flu is also a killer) but I certainly have no sympathy with vaccine refusniks who just don't wanna.

However I feel from the companies' perspective, this is less about vulnerable clients than with insurance premiums and optics. Otherwise, why make covid jabs mandatory but not flu?
Because influenza is almost only fatal in frail elderly. Plus people with influenza die quietly and cheaply at home, and do not fill general wards, affecting the health of others.
 
Hospital staff can be required to have certain vaccinations to work at all identities other generally or on specialist units. But this should only be required when justified. Many other countries already mandate flu vaccines for all health staff.
 
Because influenza is almost only fatal in frail elderly. Plus people with influenza die quietly and cheaply at home, and do not fill general wards, affecting the health of others.

That's got nothing to do with it because so do disabled and elderly people with covid, now (see the new DNRs put in place during the last year). Plus flu kills more people than just elderly people (eg people with lung problems, heart problems, kidney problems, and people with broadly compromised immune systems). And most 'care work' (eg with Barchester) is looking after frail elderly people.

So, wrong, wrong, and wrong.

(Edited for detail)
 
Last edited:
I suspect there won't be a one size fits all standard Covid Passport the way some people seem to be talking about it.

I suspect there could be increasing examples of being asked to show either a record of vaccination or a recent negative test in order to access particular places or events, but as has been said before, both of those would be fairly easy to fake or borrow someone else's if people really wanted to get round it.
 
That's got nothing to do with it because so do disabled and elderly people with covid, now (the new DNRs in.place don't just apply to covid). Plus flu kills more people than just elderly people (eg people with lung problems, heart problems, kidney problems, and people with broadly compromised immune systems). And most 'care work' is looking after frail elderly people.

So, wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong.
As usual...

You make a good point about the flu, but right at this moment, it is covid19 that has brought the world to a standstill - and severely restricted services available to some of the most vulnerable. My dad is an example. The day centre he used to attend is closed due to covid, and respite care suspended, so my mum gets no relief, and they are very reliant on carers coming into their home twice a day. I think they are entitled to expect all carers to be covid vaccinated. They're in their late 80s and they are very vulnerable, so I checked that all the carers had been vaccinated. They have been. I'd have been pissed off if they hadn't.
 
Hospital staff can be required to have certain vaccinations to work at all identities other generally or on specialist units. But this should only be required when justified. Many other countries already mandate flu vaccines for all health staff.
The obvious question is, who decides when it's justified?
 
That's got nothing to do with it because so do disabled and elderly people with covid, now (see the new DNRs put in place during the last year). Plus flu kills more people than just elderly people (eg people with lung problems, heart problems, kidney problems, and people with broadly compromised immune systems). And most 'care work' is looking after frail elderly people.

So, wrong, wrong, and wrong.
Flu deaths are usually at home or after a brief hospitisation. If flu was as vigilant and used as many bed days as Covid, we would have been in lockdown every year. Think!
 
They're in their late 80s and they are very vulnerable, so I checked that all the carers had been vaccinated. They have been. I'd have been pissed off if they hadn't.

Out of interest, do you check about flu vaccine status, and would it bother you if the carers had not had one, say in the middle of flu season?
 
Out of interest, do you check about flu vaccine status, and would it bother you if the carers had not had one, say in the middle of flu season?
No I haven't checked that, and flu and what to do about it is an issue that I've only really thought about since the start of the pandemic. As I said, you do make a good point about flu. But I don't think that affects the issue wrt covid vaccines.
 
We did not go into lockdown because of vulnerable people, but because whereas flu tends only to kill vulnerable people, covid kills anyone, vulnerable or not.

Think! :facepalm:

Flu kills very vulnerable people who either die at home or quickly in hospital. Covid kills vulnerable people and others in a manner that uses many bed days in hospital.
 
Back
Top Bottom